ARCHIVE ▾

CBA ▾

CALCULATORS ▾

FANTASY-TOOLS ▾

TOOLS ▾

INTERACTIVE ▾

OldRedFox

Canucks

Member Since

Apr. 19, 2017

Favourite Team

Vancouver Canucks

Forum Posts

40

Posts per Day

0.0

ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 19, 2017 at 10:31 a.m.

Thread: Toronto speculation

The Leafs were scouting the Nashville/Anaheim game. Vatanen is a player the Ducks would move for that price, no doubt.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 19, 2017 at 10:27 a.m.

Thread: 18 Soft Shuffle

Leafs would need to add more in a package for Tanev, the Canucks are flush with minor league D men. A first rounder instead of Valiev maybe gets it done. The Larkin trade is intriguing.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 18, 2017 at 2:18 p.m.

Thread: Opening Night

Tanev trade you propose makes no sense. No real assets coming back. Tanev is worth much much more. Has to get at least a first and more than a c type prospect.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 15, 2017 at 11:31 p.m.

Thread: Shanaplan

Barrie would require at least one if not two young defense men going the other way, otherwise Colorado will pass. I see Rychel tossed into a lot of trades by Leaf fans, but I don't see a lot of value in him. Rychel is looking like nothing more than a career minor leaguer at this point.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 13, 2017 at 12:46 p.m.

Thread: Edmonton Oilers 2017-18 Roster

Can't see Eberle getting back a first round pick in any scenario. 6M per year for what he brings is STEEP. Considering the Oilers will need the cap space and everyone knows it, Eberle is looking like a salary dump type trade. Not quite as paltry a return as Yakupov, but definitely closer to that than your proposal.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 13, 2017 at 12:25 p.m.

Thread: Tanev overrated

I think many of you are under rating Tanev. See <a href="http://hockeyanalysis.com/2017/05/07/who-should-leafs-target-to-improve-defense/" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://hockeyanalysis.com/2017/05/07/who-should-leafs-target-to-improve-defense/</a> for a nice read. The fact that there are very few right handed d-men with his peripherals available just increases his value. Considering Shattenkirk ( a one dimensional rental ) fetched a first at the TD, Tanev should get a 1st AND a good ( not great ) prospect that is ready to play at minimum. Anything less and it makes no sense for Benning to trade him.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5, 2017 at 1:18 p.m.

Thread: Rebuild

They get will have one of the deepest D corps in the East, they get rid of a contract they have been trying to move for over a year, nothing comes off their roster, no more draft picks lost and they have the depth to make this trade. Added bonus : Tanev does not go to Tampa or Toronto.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 5, 2017 at 1:06 p.m.

Thread: Off-Season

That is exactly the type of trade the Canucks need to make. Anything less and there is no point Trading Tanev.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 4, 2017 at 11:40 p.m.

Thread: Oilers - 003

Eberle won't get much in return in the event of a trade. Huge salary vs poor overall play. Get more than Yakupov, but not much.

Forum: Armchair-GMMay 4, 2017 at 11:29 p.m.

Thread: Rebuild

The lack of higher end right handed D on the market increases his value greatly. Is he an elite D man? No. He would be a top pairing player on many teams though. The contract and term remaining just add more value. Throw in a bad contract coming back and you up the value again. A 16/17 overall is a crapshoot (especially in this draft) and on its own wouldn't make any sense. While the Canucks SHOULD trade Tanev, they can only make the deal if they get excellent value. It is a sellers market and they need to get top dollar.

SalarySwish | NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly

Popular Teams
Toronto Raptors | Los Angeles Lakers | New York Knicks | Chicago Bulls | Boston Celtics | Cleveland Cavaliers | Golden State Warriors | Miami Heat | Houston Rockets

Popular Players
LeBron James | Stephen Curry | Kawhi Leonard | Pascal Siakam | Kyrie Irving | Giannis Antetokounmpo | James Harden | Kevin Durant | Nikola Jokić | Luka Dončić

Terms of UsePrivacy PolicyForum RulesAboutCBA FAQContact Us

Follow @CapFriendly

© 2024 CapFriendly.com