SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

SpezNc

Member Since
Jul. 3, 2016
Favourite Team
Montreal Canadiens
2nd Favourite Team
Edmonton Oilers
Forum Posts
34
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 14, 2020 at 1:06 a.m.
Thread: MTL Canadiens 20-21
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ajp_18</b></div><div>MTL and TOR fans do some crazy things with their prospects tbh.... don’t be so short with them. They’re call prospects for a reason.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ajp_18</b></div><div>MTL and TOR fans do some crazy things with their prospects tbh.... don’t be so short with them. They’re call prospects for a reason.</div></div>

I am not trying to get rid of Poehling. I still believe he has potential. I simply think Anderson can bring an element we are missing and that kind of player he rarely giving away by the other team. Obviously if I could get Anderson by giving away my worst prospect I would do it but Columbus would not. The fact I still believe in him is the reason I assume Poehling could interest Columbus. Also this is for discussion purpose. To see if there is a match between Columbus and Montreal. Last year, we assumed Poehling would be a middle C for us and Suzuki an RW. One year later, Poehling is still valuable but not an untouchable.
Forum: Armchair-GMSep. 12, 2018 at 9:15 p.m.
Thread: Montreal Camp Experience lines
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CaptainFlynnt</b></div><div>I like the combos (although I think Drouin and Gallagher should be a lock to play together this season) should be interesting to watch. What about Brook and Fluery? They are the most interest d prospects to watch for the habs.</div></div>

For Fleury-Brook, i agree. Unfortunately they are not signed therefore not created in cap friendly.
For Drouin-Gallagher duo, i agree. But i wanted to put Kotkaniemi with 2 of our best shooter. Also I was thinking it would be good for Kotkaniemi to start with Gallagher.
As for Suzuki, i wanted to put him with Domi, a speedster and drouin our most gifted forward.

But another possibility would be:
Suzuki-Drouin-Gallagher
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Lekhonen
Or
Tatar-Drouin-Gallagher
Domi-Kotkaniemi-Suzuki
Lekhonen-Danault-Sherbak
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 7, 2017 at 7:36 p.m.
Thread: Tavares trade discussion according to TSN (link included)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CaptainFlynnt</b></div><div>As a habs fan, I wouldn't be interested in this. Tavares has 1 year left and could walk if the habs don't meet his contract demands, which will be a lot. Galchenyuk and Sergachev should be a big part of this team going forward and will be a lot cheaper for many more years.</div></div>

Of course this trade would only be done if it's a "trade and signed" . Yes its a lot and yes the habs management want to keep sergachev. But défense is not so bad right now and Tavares would automatically make us contender! It's a lot . In the long run we may lose the trade, but I would do the trade in a heartbeat. JT as a habs would be a dream . But I don't see it happening
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 1, 2017 at 12:44 p.m.
Thread: dddd
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bishopsdad</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>firegmcphee</b></div><div>Galchenyuk and Sergachev are good young players but Tavares is a Franchise player. Teams don't trade franchise players, especially not at his age.</div></div>

Depends on whether or not he resigns. If you know he's out the door a year from now, come hell or high water, don't you try and get something for him now?</div></div>

The problem is that franchise player usually don't walk away because $$$ is not an issue and the team do everything to retain the player! In the past, the Sedins, Crosby, Ovy, Kane, Toews, Thornton, Stamkos, Malkin, etc etc did not walk away!

Maybe Tavares will and I still do think that the Isles will do everything to keep him. IMO, Duchene is most likely to be traded and the habs has something Sakic want (Sergachev). The question is , will Marc Bergevin accept? Do the price of Sergachev +++ for Duchene is too expensive?

I agree that your trade for Tavares make sense from habs standpoint! I also agree the Isles might better off by trading him. But I doubt Tavares move!
Forum: Armchair-GMApr. 26, 2017 at 1:09 p.m.
Thread: Montreal Canadiens 17-18
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Larkinisking</b></div><div>Duchene isn't going to Montreal without Sergachev heading to Colorado not going to happen.</div></div>

For sure that Sakic will ask for Sergachev. He has too. But no way the difference between Galchenyuk and Duchene is Sergachev.

Galchenyuk is younger, cheaper, was a top 3 pick and still got untapped potential! For some reason he need a change of scenery. But he is still a very good player. Before his injury he was rocking!

As for Duchene, I think he is a type of centreman we need plus his time is due in Colorado! His last season was awful!

Galchenyuk even got more point than Duchene in fewer games.

Duchene is great and I really want him! But his value dropped like Galchenyuk this year.

I don't mind to add another second rounder and a prospect like Sherbak if it's necessary to get the job done! Or replace 2 2nd for a first 2017

But in my books it's either Sergachev or Galchenyuk as main centrepiece but not both.

If it's both, no way Bergevin should accept! Would be a massive overpayment. No way Duchene is worth that much Galchenyuk AND Sergachev even if I love him.

But maybe you are right! Hope not but maybe you are :)

Plan B is RNH in my opinion !