SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

TanSor

Member Since
Jun. 26, 2017
Favourite Team
Minnesota Wild
2nd Favourite Team
Seattle Kraken
Forum Posts
8697
Posts per Day
3.5
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 2, 2023 at 10:45 a.m.
Thread: Rumors Persist
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>MNBassman</b></div><div>Would you consider a 1:1 with Addison and Boeser a fair deal?

I’m less concerned about the future of the Wild’s middle after reading the recent Athletic article about Rossi. Would I still prefer a center, absolutely, but taking a chance on Boeser (considering the price) might be a better way for the Wild to spend their assets…

All I know for sure is Boldy needs someone to play with!</div></div>

No, I think Addison has more value. From a pure point production standpoint he is very similar to Boeser this year and he'll probably cost $3M AAV at the most next season with more team control while Boeser is older, plays a less premium position, and has a much higher cap hit.

If we can make the money work I wouldn't mind adding Boeser, but I wouldn't be super happy about using Addison as the chip to get him unless there's something else coming back.
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 20, 2022 at 3:22 p.m.
Thread: A thought
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Ledge_And_Dairy</b></div><div>Calgary is moving along just fine right now and are not at all interested in downgrading their goaltending. If you want Vladar it will be in the offseason.



I don't mind Hartman, especially at that cap hit. I think he's more suited for a center role than RW though and he's certainly not moving any of our current centers out. I do think he overperformed quite a bit last year though and will come back down to earth now. <strong>As for Weegar and Tanev, absolutely not available.</strong></div></div>

Completely agree. What I was trying to say is that (assuming Hartman returns to form) we need a 1C a lot more than another good RD and given that, we shouldn't settle for anything other than those two if the Flames want Hartman.