SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

TheTypicalLeafsFan

GO LEAFS GO
Member Since
Feb. 15, 2022
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
598
Posts per Day
0.7
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 16, 2022 at 9:30 a.m.
Thread: CampbellMuzzin out Gibson in
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Salzy</b></div><div>"I like the one done this year where 3.5% of players chose Gibson as the goalie they'd want to have. Likely players from the Ducks, lol."
"Its a voluntary poll. We don't know how many players votes from the various teams. "

How do those two points made by you not contradict eachother now?

This should be funny to see you "logic" your way out of</div></div>

It's amazing you can't do it yourself, english must not be your first language. Ducks players likely voted for Gibson, we don't know how many Ducks players voted. Those don't oppose each other in the slightest way.

You keep making this claim that people that matter value Gibson highly. What exactly is this based off of? A poll where 18 of 537 people chose him?
Forum: Armchair-GMJun. 16, 2022 at 9:10 a.m.
Thread: CampbellMuzzin out Gibson in
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Lenny7</b></div><div>I'm going along with what he's saying because there's really zero point in arguing Gibson's value on here at this point. It's been a hilarious circle jerk of people trading nothing for him, putting him as their starting goaltender, then turning around and saying "Yeah but no! he's a cap dump! Sure he's our new starter, but why would we give up any value for him?! .905 SaVe PeRcEnTaGe!"

It's the ACGM way! Trade for a player, then when someone says "that's not enough", you immediately bash the player that you've traded for.</div></div>

Ok, so in true unAGM fashion...explain why Gibson would be worth anything after 3 bad seasons in a row, with a big contract and lots of term. Bonus points if you can find a comparable player who fetched a premium after that kind of recent resume.
Forum: Armchair-GMMar. 3, 2022 at 10:20 a.m.
Thread: Cup champs
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Hammerwise</b></div><div>Philly wants a RD, which makes COL a good trade partner.

A simple and probably accepted offer is one of Compher or Jost (Jost being the more desired player), a 1st rounder in 2023, and then one of Barron or Helleson (Barron being the more desired prospect).

I would expect if Jost is offered, the prospect is Helleson and and if Compher is the player, Barron is the prospect.</div></div>

It actually makes the Avs a bad trade partner and I'd expect them to reject a proposal involving Barron and sure as hell not offer him. I'd prefer them not to move either of Barron or Helleson. More likely offer imo is Compher, 1st plus Ranta/Kaut/Bowers. Any more than that and I'd walk away from the table if I were Joe. Giroux has almost total control over where he goes and the Avs don't need him, he'd simply be a nice piece to have. Overpaying is not a good idea.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 25, 2022 at 9:32 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17, 2022 at 8:58 a.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMFeb. 17, 2022 at 8:10 a.m.
Thread: What we need to do
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>mokumboi</b></div><div>You seem to have forgotten all that retention you;re asking for. That alone costs more than a late 1st. PLUS you've delayed the 1sts, so one doesn't come for over a year and one doesn't come for over two years. I mean, c'mon. Chych with no retention <em>starts </em>with a <strong>'22</strong> 1st and Sandin. And your "top 6 forward" has only one year of control before hitting UFA at age 28.

Just being real with ya, man. If somebody could have hoodwinked Billy boy out of Chych, it would have happened by now.</div></div>

Change the picks, seeing as that Philly deal doesn't happen.

2022 first
2023 first
2023 second
Sandin
Kerfoot
Engvall

ARZ needs roster players, seeing as they have 6 total starting next season and need to be at the cap floor. Now they have 4 first round picks, that's without any other trades they make this year. 2 more firsts for the year after and another second. This is an underpay? Man, a lot of people on here are going to be stunned when they see what the actual deal looks like.