SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

bmorgs95

Available for hire
Member Since
Apr. 29, 2017
Favourite Team
Colorado Avalanche
Forum Posts
21
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMJan. 5, 2018 at 6:30 p.m.
Thread: Deadline/draft (PIT, NJ, LA, OTT)
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>TJTwolf</b></div><div>Barrie would be the more sensible player to move from the RHD. More desirable for other teams. Get more back for him. Dump cap without necessarily taking on. Remove a diminutive D who is weak defensively to make room for two small D who are (hopefully) already better at playing D than Barrie (can't be much worse even if they make junior mistakes). Barrie, Makar, Girard &amp; Timmins would make for a tiny D that would get knocked from pillar to post. Have to have some size &amp; experience.</div></div>
I tried to brain storm for a straight up hockey deal, with just trading Johnson 1 for 1 to get a left handed version of him but couldn't think of anyone. Timmins isn't overly small at 6'1'', not a big dman but should be someone who could be knocked around.
Forum: Armchair-GMMay 4, 2017 at 8:55 p.m.
Thread: Moves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>HockeyNM1510</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>bmorgs95</b></div><div>

Untouchable? There's a pretty good chance Silfverberg will be an expansion draft casualty, unless the ducks trade one of Lindholm, Vatanen or Fowler prior to the expansion draft.</div></div>

Hey will go 7-3-1 protecting Getzlaf-Perry-Kesler-Rakell-Silfverberg-Cogliano- Vermette, Lindholm-Fowler-Manson, Gibson. Vatanen will probably be traded either him or Fowler/Manson. Bieksa would waive NMC or be bought out.</div></div>

Buying Bieksa out make sense even if it on team right against the cap it is worth it for the expansion draft. I don't know why you'd want to trade Vatanen though at that point I'd say it just better to protect him over trading him for I'm assuming picks or prospect who are exempted from the expansion.