SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

butthole_bandit

Bandito
Member Since
Nov. 8, 2017
Forum Posts
12
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMDec. 10, 2017 at 1:40 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 27, 2017 at 10:21 p.m.
Thread: O'Reilly
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawks34</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>butthole_bandit</b></div><div>No way we would trade schmaltz for ROR. If anything, we would trade for him to be a center, not a winger. Would be more realistic if we traded vinnie and anisimov would probably be on the move as well to make room for him. I would've also suggested trading murphy to make cap space, which could make sense for buffalo to potentially add a young gritty D-Man, but his value isnt that high right now and Q is liking his progress. Overall, probably 0 chance this deal happens unless anisimov is part of the return package (unlikely for buffalos needs unless they are 100% resigning kane) or he gets dealt beforehand.</div></div>

ya you may be right. i would like to have him with kane though. maybe the hawks could make this move in the offseason or something.</div></div>

<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>ChiHawks34</b></div><div><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>butthole_bandit</b></div><div>No way we would trade schmaltz for ROR. If anything, we would trade for him to be a center, not a winger. Would be more realistic if we traded vinnie and anisimov would probably be on the move as well to make room for him. I would've also suggested trading murphy to make cap space, which could make sense for buffalo to potentially add a young gritty D-Man, but his value isnt that high right now and Q is liking his progress. Overall, probably 0 chance this deal happens unless anisimov is part of the return package (unlikely for buffalos needs unless they are 100% resigning kane) or he gets dealt beforehand.</div></div>

ya you may be right. i would like to have him with kane though. maybe the hawks could make this move in the offseason or something.</div></div>

As of right now, I wouldnt like this to happen, as anisimov is on fire lately and seems to be the only reason our PP isnt last place. Not saying I wouldnt take ROR as a 2nd/3rd line center, but having 22.9 mil tied up in our 3 centers seems like a bit much and I dont want to trade anisimov at the moment. This wouldve seemed like a great idea in the start of the season though
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 13, 2017 at 6:49 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>graderman</b></div><div>No idea why you have little/no interest in Tanner Kero. Exactly what has he done or not done to be waived at this point? If you want to call up Highmore and Dauphin, then do something with Oesterle first. There is no reason to have 8 dmen on the roster when the team has such a time scoring most nights. To my point, in his two games back, Kero has a goal and an assist and has fared decent (for a Hawk) on the dot. While he might not be an integral part as a center, there sure aren't many if any that have done better in these past two games. I am very glad he's been reinstated into the lineup and hope Q (but no A) keeps him active.

As for your lines and pairings, Sharp should be healthy scratch and so should his old buddy Seabrook!! Then move Murph back to his natural right side with Kempny.</div></div>

Notice how I didn't send him down in this? I agree with you that he has been doing fine, but I am saying that he isn't exactly the greatest center for alex debrincat as a more offensive minded center would be. Given how well debrincat has done in the defensive zone for a rookie though, I would say it would definitely be fine for now. As for scratching seabrook, I do agree with you, but there is no way on earth quenneville scratches seabrook. So I am thinking how quenneville would roll them. If it were up to me, seabrook would be gone by now. But the likelihood of that happening in the near future is slim to none.