DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
rgill
Toronto Maple Leafs
Member Since
Nov. 18, 2016
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
43
Posts per Day
0.0
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 4, 2016 at 11:03 p.m.
Thread:
Could this team win a playoff round or two?
Probably.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 4, 2016 at 11:03 p.m.
Thread:
Leafs - Canucks
Leaf's brass moves van Riemsdyk for D before even considering moving Nylander. Kid's gonna be a stud. I don't see the Leafs sacrificing him for the sake of the top-4. There are other ways to address the need.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 29, 2016 at 11:01 p.m.
Thread:
Hamilton Trade
A very easy "no" from Toronto.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 29, 2016 at 1:28 p.m.
Thread:
Brandyn Carlole
Toronto aims higher than Carlo if they trade Nylander.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 29, 2016 at 1:27 p.m.
Thread:
Hamilton Trade
Finally someone makes a reasonable proposal regarding Hamilton. If I'm Toronto I do van Riemsdyk for Hamilton. The market for a young, skilled top-4 RHD has been set and I believe this proposal offers value to both teams.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 29, 2016 at 11:42 a.m.
Thread:
Here Comes The Boone (TOR - CLB)
Any idea if Jenner is actually available for trade? He seems like a guy Columbus would want to keep.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 29, 2016 at 11:41 a.m.
Thread:
Trade for a D
Good one. Now, c'mon, where is the real trade that you're proposing?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 29, 2016 at 11:16 a.m.
Thread:
Dougie Hamilton
Calgary is not getting enough value back in this deal. If the Leafs want Hamilton they will have to part with one of van Riemsdyk/Kadri/Gardiner/1st rounder + supplementary pieces.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 29, 2016 at 12:24 a.m.
Thread:
calgary trade
I love blockbusters, but we're not getting Hamilton, Tkachuk, AND Andersson without parting with one of Marner and Nylander plus complimentary pieces like Gardiner and Carrick. I think Hamilton could be had for van Riemsdyk, Carrick, and maybe a B prospect/mid-round pick, but that's just me thinking out loud.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 28, 2016 at 10:12 p.m.
Thread:
Dougie Hamilton
You're reasoning behind the trade makes sense I guess, but I can't really see something like this ever come to fruition in reality.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 28, 2016 at 10:08 p.m.
Thread:
hamilton
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>hockeymad</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rgill</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>hockeymad</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rgill</b></div><div><i>You have to think that Calgary would want a substantial piece back in any deal for Hamilton (i.e., van Riemsdyk). Don't know what value Holland and Corrado have at the moment. Kapanen is a solid prospect and those two second rounders represent good value. I personally think that any deal revolves around JvR.</i></div></div>
Can you or somebody else explain to my why the leafs would even consider a cap dump like Hamilton where he doesn't put 100% in every game and putting him in a market where slackers get eaten alive?</i></div></div>
To say that Hamilton is a cap dump is extreme. He fills a great need and puts up solid numbers. Hamilton also possess good potential that could be tapped under the right coach. Are you telling me that Hamilton wouldn't improve our top-4? The kid is certainly a top-4 guy that could develop into a top-2 guy. Let's not overlook his Boston days when many considered him to be better than Rielly. You just don't lose that talent over a season. In regards to your comment about him not putting in 100%, the Leafs are trying to build a culture here centred on winning and hard work. I'm not sure that Shanahan and company would pursue a player that they believe won't contribute to this culture.</i></div></div>
That is exactly my point there were issues with his Effort in Boston that's why they traded him. Also, he would only improve our roster if he starts playing more consistently. So seeing we agree to this why would The leafs give JVR when Hamilton is not worth that right now. You don't trade at value they should be only where they are at the time of the trade. The leafs have not made any play for Hamilton as far as I know cause Calgary are looking for top tier players for him even though he is not worth that right now. So until he improves he is at full salary a cap dump. The need is a consistent physical top 4/ Top 2 RHD so be honest with your self he is neither.</i></div></div>
I highly doubt questions about his "effort" was the primary reason he was traded. At the time he was traded it was widely publicized by those in the know that Hamilton and the Boston locker room didn't see eye-to-eye at times because of his personality. Consistency is an issue that all young players face, Hamilton is no different. While he isn't overly physical he can throw his body around when need be. He's a great breakout player, but can also cover at the back when breakouts go wrong. As such I think he'd be great in Toronto's fast-paced system. You may not see him as a top-4 guy, but I and quite a few others do. We'll agree to disagree.
Forum:
Site Discussion
Nov. 28, 2016 at 9:06 p.m.
Thread:
GM Connected Event
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>LeafsFan</b></div><div><i>I know this is really different and would be hard to set up, but I think it would be kind of cool to set up like a two week event where some of the frequent users take control of a team and can make offers to other teams and shape their roster to how they please and at the end we can view all the transactions that took place. You could even vote on most savvy GM and they can win some sort of like online "medal" to distinguish their amazing Armchair-GM - ing. With many of the AGM's comments are often saying that it won't work, this way we can sort of figure out a common ground in trades. :)</i></div></div>
This would be cool!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 28, 2016 at 9:00 p.m.
Thread:
hamilton
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>hockeymad</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rgill</b></div><div><i>You have to think that Calgary would want a substantial piece back in any deal for Hamilton (i.e., van Riemsdyk). Don't know what value Holland and Corrado have at the moment. Kapanen is a solid prospect and those two second rounders represent good value. I personally think that any deal revolves around JvR.</i></div></div>
Can you or somebody else explain to my why the leafs would even consider a cap dump like Hamilton where he doesn't put 100% in every game and putting him in a market where slackers get eaten alive?</i></div></div>
To say that Hamilton is a cap dump is extreme. He fills a great need and puts up solid numbers. Hamilton also possess good potential that could be tapped under the right coach. Are you telling me that Hamilton wouldn't improve our top-4? The kid is certainly a top-4 guy that could develop into a top-2 guy. Let's not overlook his Boston days when many considered him to be better than Rielly. You just don't lose that talent over a season. In regards to your comment about him not putting in 100%, the Leafs are trying to build a culture here centred on winning and hard work. I'm not sure that Shanahan and company would pursue a player that they believe won't contribute to this culture.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 28, 2016 at 6:09 p.m.
Thread:
Top 4 boost
I don't see the Leafs making a deal like this. Edler is on the wrong side of 30 and to give up two solid young pieces in Kapanen and Carrick goes against the rebuild. Grenier is a solid piece, however. I only see guys like Kapanen and Carrick being moved for young, high potential defencemen such as Dougie Hamilton.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 28, 2016 at 6:04 p.m.
Thread:
Ideal
The Coyotes ask for Larkin in any deal for Chychrun. The conversation ends at that point.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 28, 2016 at 6:01 p.m.
Thread:
hamilton
You have to think that Calgary would want a substantial piece back in any deal for Hamilton (i.e., van Riemsdyk). Don't know what value Holland and Corrado have at the moment. Kapanen is a solid prospect and those two second rounders represent good value. I personally think that any deal revolves around JvR.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 27, 2016 at 8:36 p.m.
Thread:
Whats all this dougie talk
There could be something to this. Calgary GM Brad Treliving was in Toronto last night to watch the Caps-Leafs game. Toronto Director of Pro Scouting Dave Morrison is in Philadelphia tonight watching the Flames-Flyers game. Dubas was seen scouting a Flames game earlier in the week too. Could just be regular scouting trips, but the big boys are out.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 25, 2016 at 4:34 p.m.
Thread:
Leafs in 2018 season opener
I think JvR gets closer to $6 million AAV on his next contract. His next contract is probably going to be his last opportunity to really cash in.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 25, 2016 at 2:16 p.m.
Thread:
LEAFS signings in 2018-19
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mr_cap</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>leafs1967again</b></div><div><i>Ben Smith signed for about $1.3M more than he will get.
JVR under paid.
Many other contracts (sosh way too much for example) off but will ignore that. Just don't see this concept working. LW is very weak.</i></div></div> What? How is Smith overpaid? One-year contract at 2 mill and especially if that there's a possibility that they could be below the cap floor. He's a good player for 4C and that contract has only got one-year on it which is perfect.
JVR might be underpaid but if you're gonna give him more say for example like a 5-6 mill contract then it's gonna be a 3 year deal. No way they take him at 4 years. They'll have problems later on.
What's wrong with Sosh? He's a great player.</i></div></div>
I really like Soshnikov, too. Not a fan of how Babcock is using him, however. The guy could do damage offensively playing with skilled forwards on the third or second line. What do you all think of Soshnikov-Matthews-Nylander long-term?
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 25, 2016 at 11:16 a.m.
Thread:
LEAFS signings in 2018-19
Consdering the comps and the market for defencemen you have to think Fowler and Stone get more dollar and term as free agents.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 25, 2016 at 11:14 a.m.
Thread:
Galchenyuk?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mr_cap</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rgill</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rgill</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rgill</b></div><div><i>Weird trade for Toronto to make.<strong> Nylander arguably has more upside then Galchenyuk</strong>. Let's see what we have in one of our core pieces before deciding to ship him out. I highly doubt the Leafs consider moving Nylander for anyone who isn't a current or potential top-pairing defenceman.</i></div></div>
How can you make that assessment?</i></div></div>
It's just my opinion. I think Nylander has the potential to be a more dynamic player. I know the sample is small but Nylander registered a higher PPG than Galchenyuk in their first years in the league. That Leaf team finished 30th in the league, too.</i></div></div>
Registering a higher pt per game on a terrible team does not mean one has a higher ceiling. Galchenyuk was sheltered early because the team in front of him was a playoff calibre team unlike the Leafs. Chucky also went directly from junior to NHL without any transition period unlike Nylander. Nylander is also much smaller than Galchenyuk and I have to think the big goal scoring center will have a bigger impact then the smallish winger in key situations.
I'll concede that there is plausibility that Nylander may be as good as Galchenyuk at the same age but no way can it be said that his ceiling is higher.</i></div></div>
Look, we're both gonna have our biases in this debate. I'm just saying ask anyone neutral about Nylander and Galchenyuk and 7/10 will take Nylander. There is some flair to Nylander's game which just makes you go "wow". I don't have the same feeling with Galchenyuk.</i></div></div> Ok, the thing with Nylander is he's dynamic which complements a player like Mathews, or Toews, or Kopitar,etc. Galchenyuk is a different caliber of a player, like a Seguin. So in terms of who has the higher potential I personally think it would be Nylander (points wise) BUT Galchenyuk I think will end up being the more complete player.</i></div></div>
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Mr_cap</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rgill</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rgill</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rgill</b></div><div><i>Weird trade for Toronto to make.<strong> Nylander arguably has more upside then Galchenyuk</strong>. Let's see what we have in one of our core pieces before deciding to ship him out. I highly doubt the Leafs consider moving Nylander for anyone who isn't a current or potential top-pairing defenceman.</i></div></div>
How can you make that assessment?</i></div></div>
It's just my opinion. I think Nylander has the potential to be a more dynamic player. I know the sample is small but Nylander registered a higher PPG than Galchenyuk in their first years in the league. That Leaf team finished 30th in the league, too.</i></div></div>
Registering a higher pt per game on a terrible team does not mean one has a higher ceiling. Galchenyuk was sheltered early because the team in front of him was a playoff calibre team unlike the Leafs. Chucky also went directly from junior to NHL without any transition period unlike Nylander. Nylander is also much smaller than Galchenyuk and I have to think the big goal scoring center will have a bigger impact then the smallish winger in key situations.
I'll concede that there is plausibility that Nylander may be as good as Galchenyuk at the same age but no way can it be said that his ceiling is higher.</i></div></div>
Look, we're both gonna have our biases in this debate. I'm just saying ask anyone neutral about Nylander and Galchenyuk and 7/10 will take Nylander. There is some flair to Nylander's game which just makes you go "wow". I don't have the same feeling with Galchenyuk.</i></div></div> Ok, the thing with Nylander is he's dynamic which complements a player like Mathews, or Toews, or Kopitar,etc. Galchenyuk is a different caliber of a player, like a Seguin. So in terms of who has the higher potential I personally think it would be Nylander (points wise) BUT Galchenyuk I think will end up being the more complete player.</i></div></div>
I hear you there, Mr_cap. Nylander will rack up points but I highly doubt that he develops a 100 foot game that matches his scoring acumen.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 25, 2016 at 10:19 a.m.
Thread:
2017/18 re-tool
Forget a re-tool, Vancouver needs a full out rebuild.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 25, 2016 at 10:18 a.m.
Thread:
Galchenyuk?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rgill</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rgill</b></div><div><i>Weird trade for Toronto to make.<strong> Nylander arguably has more upside then Galchenyuk</strong>. Let's see what we have in one of our core pieces before deciding to ship him out. I highly doubt the Leafs consider moving Nylander for anyone who isn't a current or potential top-pairing defenceman.</i></div></div>
How can you make that assessment?</i></div></div>
It's just my opinion. I think Nylander has the potential to be a more dynamic player. I know the sample is small but Nylander registered a higher PPG than Galchenyuk in their first years in the league. That Leaf team finished 30th in the league, too.</i></div></div>
Registering a higher pt per game on a terrible team does not mean one has a higher ceiling. Galchenyuk was sheltered early because the team in front of him was a playoff calibre team unlike the Leafs. Chucky also went directly from junior to NHL without any transition period unlike Nylander. Nylander is also much smaller than Galchenyuk and I have to think the big goal scoring center will have a bigger impact then the smallish winger in key situations.
I'll concede that there is plausibility that Nylander may be as good as Galchenyuk at the same age but no way can it be said that his ceiling is higher.</i></div></div>
Look, we're both gonna have our biases in this debate. I'm just saying ask anyone neutral about Nylander and Galchenyuk and 7/10 will take Nylander. There is some flair to Nylander's game which just makes you go "wow". I don't have the same feeling with Galchenyuk.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 24, 2016 at 5:11 p.m.
Thread:
2017-18
Alzner gets north of $5 million AAV (maybe close to $6m) as an FA.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Nov. 24, 2016 at 5:09 p.m.
Thread:
Galchenyuk?
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>F50marco</b></div><div><i><div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>rgill</b></div><div><i>Weird trade for Toronto to make.<strong> Nylander arguably has more upside then Galchenyuk</strong>. Let's see what we have in one of our core pieces before deciding to ship him out. I highly doubt the Leafs consider moving Nylander for anyone who isn't a current or potential top-pairing defenceman.</i></div></div>
How can you make that assessment?</i></div></div>
It's just my opinion. I think Nylander has the potential to be a more dynamic player. I know the sample is small but Nylander registered a higher PPG than Galchenyuk in their first years in the league. That Leaf team finished 30th in the league, too.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com