SalarySwishSalarySwish
Avatar

sebski

sebski
Member Since
Aug. 5, 2018
Favourite Team
Toronto Maple Leafs
Forum Posts
72
Posts per Day
0.0
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 21, 2018 at 2:39 p.m.
Thread: a thot
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 21, 2018 at 2:36 p.m.
Thread: a thot
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 17, 2018 at 4:44 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>arousedcat</b></div><div>He has expressed that he intends to come here in 2 years, so there isn't really any worry. In fact, I think it's actually benefiting him since he won't be thrown to the dogs in the NHL and can develop a couple years in the KHL.

To answer you question OP, I don't think there is a price. He's pretty much an untouchable piece unless the team trading for him overpayed (something like Dahlin, Petterson, Matthews, etc...) which isn't happening. It would take an extremely enticing offer for Fenton to move him. Fenton was actually in Russia last week meeting Kaprizov for the first time and he spoke incredibly high praise of Kaprizov. It would be very odd for them to have just met and have a good experience together for Fenton to turn around and immediately trade him. What kind of message would that send not only to Kaprizov, but also to future draft picks by the Wild? The answer is a very bad one...</div></div>

did you just bring up kaprizov in the same sentence as matthews and dahlin? hes not even ppg in the KHL. He is a good player but he is not elite the KHL is a league somewhere between the AHL and NHL skill wise. Kaprizov is most likely a 60 point 20 goal player in the NHL he has potential to be better but also hasnt proven anything in the nhl. He also isnt much of a prospect anymore at the age of 21 and his fourth season in the KHL we somewhat know what we are getting with him. his value would be around a young 50-60 point NHLer in my opinion as he has a chance to be better than that and a chance to be worse.
Forum: Armchair-GMNov. 13, 2018 at 1:51 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 20, 2018 at 1:44 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 20, 2018 at 1:07 p.m.
Forum: Armchair-GMOct. 18, 2018 at 6:28 p.m.
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Random2152</b></div><div>I think the others have made it quite well known their gripes with this, so I will attempt to take a more constructive approach.

I will start with what I like:
I think you got the aav for Kapanen and Johnsson pretty much bang on. The only thing I would change is that for that aav, Kapanen gets 3 years. The rule (for both Kappy and Johnsson) would be as follows: 1-1.99 million = 2 years, 2-2.99 million = 3 years, 3-3.5 million = 4 years.

Just a tip when using the site, when you are trying to put a player on LTIR, instead of trading them, move them to the LTIR slot. It is in the 3rd blue bar, just below the goalies when you are building the ACGM.

On to the other things:
I think you are off on some of the contracts here, by a decent amount too.
Matthews needs to win at least 2 trophies to get that aav, and minimum 1 to get 12. He will likely get something like 8 years @ 11aav.
Marner I cannot see going over 8 years @ 8aav. He is a damn good player, but woth his comparables and his production, that is roughly his max.
Never give your backup goalie that much term and that much aav, it is a recipe for disaster. Sparks will get about 800k on a one or two year contract.
As much as it pains me, I don't think Leivo is coming back, and even if he is, it won't be for that much. It will likely be just under 1 million, or somewhere around there.
Ozhiganov and Lindholm have played well since coming over, and I hope we resign them. I think they get matching contracts: 2 years @ 1.5 aav, or somewhere around there.
If Rosen makes this team next year, it will be as an extra, and he will accept his qualifying offer, as no one will offer anything else. While I do not know for sure what that would be, CapFriendly says his salary will be 0.925 aav should that happen.
If we are bringing back Marincin, it will be as an extra, so only ever 1 year for the term.
Ennis will not be back. Either he doesn't work out, and we don't want him, or he does and we cannot afford him. We have better guys on the Marlies anyway.

Edit: I will link some ACGM cap charts to help you with the big 3:
<a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/877874">https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/877874</a>
<a href="https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/884206">https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/884206</a> &lt;-- Just a warning, this one is incomplete, but still has valuable information.


On the trades:
Gardiner will likely get the same treatment as JVR and Bozak did last year. He will play out the end of his contract as we try to make a run, and will likely leave as a UFA. I think that if Dubas somehow makes it work, they want to re-sign him. I also think that you do not know who the prospect you traded him for is (he is good).
On the Nylander trade, there are three big things. The first is that Ristolinen is a similar player to Jake Gardiner. If we wanted that, we would just keep Jake.
The 2nd thing is that Nylander is worth much more than Risto, so you would be selling yourself short. This trade would look like Hall for Larsson very quickly.
The third thing is that Buffalo, like Toronto, needs Dmen, and won't trade one of their more experienced ones. When making trades, you have to factor in what the receiving team needs as well.</div></div>

I think your a little off with matthews contract. Im basing it off how dominant hes been and i believe he is going to win the rocket this year. Also trophies have nothing to do with anything there nice but does william karlson get 12 mil because he won something. Also matthews has a calder and if he wins the rocket will have 2 trophies. as for marner i anticipate a big year around 70+ points and if nylander thinks he can get 8 mil for his production then marner will probably want 10 as for what he gets i would say he deserves 8.5mil. personally i would like them at 19 mil combined but i cant see matthews looking at what eichel got and mcdavid got and not asking for close to if not mcdavids contract (which wasnt even the max).