SalarySwishSalarySwish

Blackhawks 2020-21 v2

Created by: Petrock83
Team: 2020-21 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 17, 2020
Published: Jan. 17, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Smith-Hickey Trade

NYI: Save 342,000 by replacing Hickey's buried contract with a Zack Smith buyout

CHI: Either makes the team as a reliable, veteran #6 defenseman, or costs negligibly more than a Smith buyout playing in Rockford.



And yes, I know a R. Strome might not be feasible and/or the best idea, but it's the only trade I've seen on here where we get rid of Nylander, and that's my primary goal.
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$5,000,000
2$3,000,000
1$2,000,000
1$750,000
1$5,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$7,000,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (VGK)
Additional Details:
Nick Holden
VGK
    Erik Gustafsson
    2.
    CHI
    1. Samuelsson, Mattias [Reserve List]
    Additional Details:
    Zach Bogosian
    BUF
    1. Krys, Chad
    Additional Details:
    Corey Crawford
    3.
    CHI
    1. Strome, Ryan [RFA Rights]
    NYR
    1. Nylander, Alexander
    2. 2020 2nd round pick (VGK)
    4.
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    2021
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the MTL
    2022
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the CHI
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$83,500,000$73,784,306$1,090,244$3,350,000$9,715,694
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $10,500,000$10,500,000
    C
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $6,400,000$6,400,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $5,000,000$5,000,000
    C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $2,625,000$2,625,000
    RW
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $750,000$750,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
    C, RW
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $5,538,462$5,538,462
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    RD
    RFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    G
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $4,550,000$4,550,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $925,000$925,000
    RD
    RFA - 3
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    G
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the New York Islanders
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $3,850,000$3,850,000
    RD
    UFA - 2
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $880,833$880,833
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $3,900,000$3,900,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $750,000$750,000
    LW, RW, C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $6,875,000$6,875,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
    $925,000$925,000
    LD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight

    Top Comments

    Jan. 17, 2020 at 7:25 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Nov. 2016
    Posts: 3,455
    Likes: 1,624
    Isles could still use Hickey when he gets healthy. We already have 8 4th liners, don’t need another one.
    Jan. 17, 2020 at 7:25 p.m.
    #2
    Kyle from Chicago
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2018
    Posts: 9,871
    Likes: 5,858
    I really don’t understand the obsession with getting rid of Nylander from all of the Hawks fans on here. The kid is 21(turning 22 in March) and is in the midst of his first NHL season, There are going to be learning curves. People are so obsessed with the trade that brought him here, and the hate the media cultivated around that trade and by proxy him, that they cannot handle that he is not a top 6 forward yet.

    Nylander is a project, and we knew that when we were acquiring him. It makes no sense to trade him now, while his value is probably lower than its ever been.
    Jan. 17, 2020 at 11:10 p.m.
    #3
    Roviet_Sussia
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2019
    Posts: 509
    Likes: 118
    Edited Jan. 17, 2020 at 11:17 p.m.
    Quoting: Stan_Bowman
    I really don’t understand the obsession with getting rid of Nylander from all of the Hawks fans on here. The kid is 21(turning 22 in March) and is in the midst of his first NHL season, There are going to be learning curves. People are so obsessed with the trade that brought him here, and the hate the media cultivated around that trade and by proxy him, that they cannot handle that he is not a top 6 forward yet.

    Nylander is a project, and we knew that when we were acquiring him. It makes no sense to trade him now, while his value is probably lower than its ever been.


    You've got to consider that Nylander was supposed to enter the team with an immediate impact (hence starting on the top line at the beginning of the season) and he hasn't really provided that. He's not going to get anything from going down to Rockford; that's part of the reason he wanted to get moved out of BUF and took a shot at their hockey club in the media.

    If bailing on him now means acquiring someone like Ryan Strome, I'd do it. The only thing is that I can't imagine NYR are shopping him hard considering what he's done for them.
    Petrock83 liked this.
    Jan. 17, 2020 at 11:39 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2017
    Posts: 1,519
    Likes: 656
    Quoting: Warrior24
    Isles could still use Hickey when he gets healthy. We already have 8 4th liners, don’t need another one.


    I think the Isles would accept this only if they would buy Smith out immediately. He's blocked on the depth chart by Pelech, Toews, Leddy, and Aho, so unless two of them get moved, I think saving that cap space might be more useful. Just my thought.
    Jan. 17, 2020 at 11:41 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2017
    Posts: 1,519
    Likes: 656
    Quoting: Stan_Bowman
    I really don’t understand the obsession with getting rid of Nylander from all of the Hawks fans on here. The kid is 21(turning 22 in March) and is in the midst of his first NHL season, There are going to be learning curves. People are so obsessed with the trade that brought him here, and the hate the media cultivated around that trade and by proxy him, that they cannot handle that he is not a top 6 forward yet.

    Nylander is a project, and we knew that when we were acquiring him. It makes no sense to trade him now, while his value is probably lower than its ever been.


    I'm not trading him because he isn't a top 6 forward right now, I'm trading him because, based on what I've seen, he never will be. I think we should sell on him ASAP before his value depreciates anymore. You can call him a project, but, despite his age, I don't think he has any more to show than he already has and I think he will remain in that ambiguous zone of being skilled, but not smart enough/not enough effort put in to become the speedy playmaker they want him to be.
    See All