SalarySwishSalarySwish

Anaheim Ducks EA NHL Player Ratings

Created by: nalzugaray12
Team: 2019-20 Anaheim Ducks
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 8, 2020
Published: Jun. 8, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
*I am not a fan of the Ducks*
The ratings factor in age, stats this season, stats based on the past 2 years, and TOI.

FWDS
Getzlaf- 85 (Top 6 PWF)
Rakell- 84 (Top 6 PLY)
Silfverberg- 83 (Top 6 SNP/TWF)
Henrique- 83 (Top 6 TWF)
Heinen- 81 (MED Top 6 TWF)
Milano- 80 (MED Top 6 PLY)
Steel- 79 (MED Top 6 PLY)
Rowney- 78/79 (Bottom 6 TWF)
Terry- 78 (HIGH Top 9 TWF)
Comtois- 78 (MED Top 6 TWF)
Deslauriers- 77 (Bottom 6 PWF)
Backes- 77 (Bottom 6 PWF)
Jones- 76/77 (MED Top 6 PWF)

DEF
Lindholm- 85 (HIGH Top 4 TWD)
Fowler- 84 (Top 4 OFD)
Manson- 82 (Top 4 DFD)
Del Zotto- 79 (Top 6 TWD)
Gudbranson- 79/80 (Top 6 DFD)
Larsson- 78 (MED Top 4? TWD)
Guhle- 78 (MED Top 4 TWD)
Djoos- 78 (MED Top 6 TWD)
Mahura- 76 (HIGH Top 6 TWD)

GOALIES
Gibson- 89
Miller- 82


KEY NOTES
- Rakell downgraded from Elite potential to top 6.
- Lindholm downgraded from elite to top 4.
- I don't know what to make of Max Jone's, Josh Mahura, and Larsson's potential.
- Getzlaf could be lowered by 1.
- Milano's overall was hard to decide.

Ducks fans let me know who is too high, too low.
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2021
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
2022
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the NSH
Logo of the ANA
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
24$81,500,000$69,759,457$0$1,200,000$11,740,543
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$874,125$874,125
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$8,250,000$8,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,456,250$1,456,250
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,133,333$1,133,333
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$863,333$863,333
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$700,000$700,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,500,000$6,500,000
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,050,000$2,050,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
G
UFA - 8
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,125,000$1,125,000 (Performance Bonus$1,200,000$1M)
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$675,000$675,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$894,166$894,166
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jun. 8, 2020 at 2:23 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 15,947
Likes: 8,577
Lindholm to 87, Manson to 85 i think
Dan10900 liked this.
Jun. 8, 2020 at 2:29 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
I have
Raks-85
Heinen-84
Milano 81 low 6
Steel 78
Rowney just lower, I don't remember, 76ish
Terry 82 med 6 (has been the best of the kids.)
Backes 81
Jones high 9

Lindholm 86
Manson 85
Del Zotto-bad
Guddy like 80 I think
Larsson and Guhle 76-77 low 4
Djoos 77 med 6
Mahura 76 med 4

Pretty good... My ratings are def not consensus tho so...

Other prospects I like:
BOG mid 60's med 6
Thrun med 4
LaCombe med 4
Zegras med elite
Lundestrom 70 high 9...?
Jun. 8, 2020 at 2:30 p.m.
#3
Bahston Brewins
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 899
Likes: 259
Quoting: MaxDomi13
Lindholm to 87, Manson to 85 i think


Highest I'd go for Lindholm is 85, he's a great player but you kind of want more out of him. I think he's a top pairing guy just not ideally a number 1 dman (just my opinion). Manson's play over the past couple years can't justify anything above an 83
Jun. 8, 2020 at 2:33 p.m.
#4
Bahston Brewins
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 899
Likes: 259
Quoting: AFOX10900
I have
Raks-85
Heinen-84
Milano 81 low 6
Steel 78
Rowney just lower, I don't remember, 76ish
Terry 82 med 6 (has been the best of the kids.)
Backes 81
Jones high 9

Lindholm 86
Manson 85
Del Zotto-bad
Guddy like 80 I think
Larsson and Guhle 76-77 low 4
Djoos 77 med 6
Mahura 76 med 4

Pretty good... My ratings are def not consensus tho so...

Other prospects I like:
BOG mid 60's med 6
Thrun med 4
LaCombe med 4
Zegras med elite
Lundestrom 70 high 9...?


I'm a Boston fan so I was pretty confident about my Heinen rating haha. He has a great stick defensively, but you'll get frustrated because you want a lot more offensively out of him. The talent is there, but his offensive play is no more than a third line production so that's why I would have him at an 80/81. I really do think he'll become a better player on Anaheim because there's just not a lot of pressure there right now, but he's not quite there yet
bhavikp27 liked this.
Jun. 8, 2020 at 2:54 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 7,261
Likes: 2,706
Edited Jun. 8, 2020 at 3:01 p.m.
Quoting: nalzugaray12
I'm a Boston fan so I was pretty confident about my Heinen rating haha. He has a great stick defensively, but you'll get frustrated because you want a lot more offensively out of him. The talent is there, but his offensive play is no more than a third line production so that's why I would have him at an 80/81. I really do think he'll become a better player on Anaheim because there's just not a lot of pressure there right now, but he's not quite there yet


I have 2 reasons why my rating for him is high, 1. I weigh defense really heavily, and d awareness skyrockets an ovr, and 2. I took three years into account and don't think I weighed them the best (so the 17-18 season has more weight than it should) and his best season was that year, and my ratings tend to be a bit higher than consensus across the board
See All