SalarySwishSalarySwish

Rakell would make them dangerous

Created by: Ducks
Team: 2020-21 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 21, 2020
Published: Jul. 21, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$5,250,000
4$3,500,000
2$1,750,000
1$1,000,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,750,000
Trades
1.
COL
  1. 2021 2nd round pick (NYI)
  2. 2021 3rd round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. Zadorov, Nikita [RFA Rights]
2.
COL
  1. 2020 2nd round pick (STL)
  2. 2021 4th round pick (VGK)
MTL
  1. Jost, Tyson [RFA Rights]
3.
ANA
  1. Beaucage, Alex [Reserve List]
  2. Bowers, Shane
  3. Greer, AJ [RFA Rights]
  4. 2020 1st round pick (COL)
4.
COL
  1. Fischer, Christian [RFA Rights]
ARI
  1. Kamenev, Vladislav [RFA Rights]
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the STL
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the COL
2021
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the COL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2022
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$78,731,234$0$5,425,000$2,768,766
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$9,250,000$9,250,000
RW, C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,250,000$5,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,750,000$3,750,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,900,000$3,900,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,333,333$3,333,333
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 7
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$880,833$880,833 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Colorado Avalanche
$1,800,000$1,800,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jul. 21, 2020 at 10:36 a.m.
#1
John 3 16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 9,581
Likes: 4,618
Not a bad roster at all, nice job.

Some comments on the roster:

- Calvert is a full-time part of the 4th line and won't be bumped out of the lineup. If anyone would be it would be Bellemare or Kaut.
- 5 years seems a year too much for Burakovsky. $4.85m x 4 years is probably the sweetspot.
- The blueline is a bit green, so I think we'd keep Cole around as 7D instead of Lindholm, particularly as there's enough capspace to keep him.

Regarding trades:

- Zadorov trade is good, right on the value but I would prefer a 2020 2nd if possible.
- Jost's value is probably a bit higher than a very late 2nd and a 2021 4th. If the 2nd was the MTL 2nd or CHI 2nd (which Montreal also have) then it would be acceptable.
- The Rakell trade is good, I think Colorado accept that, even if it's painful to lose Bowers and a 1st in a deep draft. Rakell would be a great fit on this team, and acquiring him without giving up one of our top 3-4 prospects would be great. If we traded Bowers for Rakell though I think we'd be inclined to keep Jost as we'd otherwise be really thin in terms of bottom 6 C depth.
Ducks liked this.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 10:40 a.m.
#2
TAVARES IS A LEAF
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 659
Likes: 175
Quoting: Richard88
Not a bad roster at all, nice job.

Some comments on the roster:

- Calvert is a full-time part of the 4th line and won't be bumped out of the lineup. If anyone would be it would be Bellemare or Kaut.
- 5 years seems a year too much for Burakovsky. $4.85m x 4 years is probably the sweetspot.
- The blueline is a bit green, so I think we'd keep Cole around as 7D instead of Lindholm, particularly as there's enough capspace to keep him.

Regarding trades:

- Zadorov trade is good, right on the value but I would prefer a 2020 2nd if possible.
- Jost's value is probably a bit higher than a very late 2nd and a 2021 4th. If the 2nd was the MTL 2nd or CHI 2nd (which Montreal also have) then it would be acceptable.
- The Rakell trade is good, I think Colorado accept that, even if it's painful to lose Bowers and a 1st in a deep draft. Rakell would be a great fit on this team, and acquiring him without giving up one of our top 3-4 prospects would be great. If we traded Bowers for Rakell though I think we'd be inclined to keep Jost as we'd otherwise be really thin in terms of bottom 6 C depth.

Cool! I don’t think teams would pay more than this for Jost though
Jul. 21, 2020 at 10:56 a.m.
#3
Boris Bagel
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2016
Posts: 2,832
Likes: 605
Jost? Habs don't need another 4th liner. Pass
Jul. 21, 2020 at 11:19 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,617
Likes: 2,764
Quoting: Foreskin_Gump
Cool! I don’t think teams would pay more than this for Jost though


I actually think right now thats too much for jost. You can get a similar to better quality player right now with the 2nd rounder. Im not sold he isnt anything more than a fringe 3rd liner.

this team would be scary offensively if they got rakell.
Ducks liked this.
Jul. 21, 2020 at 11:52 a.m.
#5
TAVARES IS A LEAF
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 659
Likes: 175
Quoting: hanson493
I actually think right now thats too much for jost. You can get a similar to better quality player right now with the 2nd rounder. Im not sold he isnt anything more than a fringe 3rd liner.

this team would be scary offensively if they got rakell.


Yeah he had like 8 goals? I wouldn’t give a 2nd for Jost unless I’m a contender who could use his depth and have late 2nd..
See All