SalarySwishSalarySwish

Wake up, Stan

Created by: graderman
Team: 2016-17 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 24, 2016
Published: Aug. 24, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Having his heart apparently set on Jimmy Vesey, Bowman lost out on Vermette. Now Hudler signed with a division rival. Both cap friendly, one year deals that could/should have been done prior to the JV infatuation. Unless there is some sort of cap miracle, the Hawks will lose Panarin by next summer, adding to the departures of numerous young forwards in the last couple of years. Why is this not a very disturbing trend, in the midst of losing prominent veterans as well? Last year should have been ample proof that one line cannot get it done all the way to a Cup! That said, Bowman does have an uncanny ability to pull a rabbit out of his sleeve like no other peer.

So here goes...

(Sadly, looking at this roster, I do not see much overall improvement or advancement from last year's group.)
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$850,000
1$575,000
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2017
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the STL
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the NYI
Logo of the ANA
2018
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2019
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$73,000,000$64,629,087$3,070,000$4,277,500$8,370,913
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 7
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 7
$812,500$812,500 (Performance Bonus$2,575,000$3M)
LW
UFA - 1
$4,550,000$4,550,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
$5,275,000$5,275,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 5
$575,000$575,000
C
UFA - 1
$2,775,000$2,775,000
C
UFA - 3
$875,000$875,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$800,000$800,000
C
UFA - 1
$667,500$667,500 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
C, LW
UFA - 1
$863,333$863,333
C, RW
UFA - 2
$850,000$850,000
C, LW
UFA
$750,000$750,000
RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 7
$4,100,000$4,100,000
LD/RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
$6,000,000$6,000,000
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 4
$1,500,000$1,500,000 (Performance Bonus$750,000$750K)
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 8
$587,500$587,500
G
UFA - 1
$700,000$700,000 (Performance Bonus$437,500$438K)
LD
UFA - 1
$825,000$825,000
RD
UFA - 2
$667,500$667,500 (Performance Bonus$257,500$258K)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Aug. 24, 2016 at 2:53 p.m.
#1
exo2769
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2015
Posts: 15,683
Likes: 9,837
Hard to argue the defense isn't improved. They had three defenders in the playoffs last year...now four for sure and possibly 5/6 depending on how good kempny is and how much a reduced role helps TVR. Hear your point on offense, but defense is quite a bit better.
graderman liked this.
Aug. 24, 2016 at 2:58 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 288
Quoting: exo2769
Hard to argue the defense isn't improved. They had three defenders in the playoffs last year...now four for sure and possibly 5/6 depending on how good kempny is and how much a reduced role helps TVR. Hear your point on offense, but defense is quite a bit better.
Absolutely. In fact, I would consider Campbell an upgrade to Oduya, not only from a salary perspective but also from total game. Kempny may be a steal, especially if he and TVR can develop chemistry on the 3rd pair. You are right, I think the offensive group is lacking a bit from a team that was shutout in regulation every 8 games or so last year.
Aug. 25, 2016 at 10:26 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2016
Posts: 1,146
Likes: 199
The deals could not have been done before the JV sweepstakes because they would have restricted the Hawks from offering full bonuses. You can only offer bonuses that will bring you no more than 7.5% over the salary cap. So its was, completely take yourself out of the running for Vesey or possibly miss out on other signings. Hard choice to make.

I will say that if Stan can still sign a scoring LW that the Hawks will be a better team than last year. Yes they are weaker on offense, but their defense is going to be unreal this year. A lot of offense comes from the defense and puck possession. With one scoring LW signing they will have 2 strong top lines and a good 4th line again. The 3rd line will be the tough spot all year but they will have the space at the deadline to then pick up another forward piece for a playoff run. If the young guys can stet up and make a decent 3rd line (probably 4th line minutes) then the Hawks will be in a good spot.
graderman liked this.
Aug. 25, 2016 at 11:21 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 288
Quoting: Hockeyplayer1
The deals could not have been done before the JV sweepstakes because they would have restricted the Hawks from offering full bonuses. You can only offer bonuses that will bring you no more than 7.5% over the salary cap. So its was, completely take yourself out of the running for Vesey or possibly miss out on other signings. Hard choice to make.

I will say that if Stan can still sign a scoring LW that the Hawks will be a better team than last year. Yes they are weaker on offense, but their defense is going to be unreal this year. A lot of offense comes from the defense and puck possession. With one scoring LW signing they will have 2 strong top lines and a good 4th line again. The 3rd line will be the tough spot all year but they will have the space at the deadline to then pick up another forward piece for a playoff run. If the young guys can stet up and make a decent 3rd line (probably 4th line minutes) then the Hawks will be in a good spot.
So who might be left available for that now elusive top six LW slot? So far it's 0-3 in the past week or so of possible top candidates. It appears that maybe 5 rookies may make the team out of camp. Is that what the HC really wants to go with? I agree that the Hawks are still very close to their ONEGOAL, and should be a much better puck possession team this season. It just stinks to lose two viable vets to WC rivals and be spurned by another college kid to the Rags. Is there some "writing on the wall" that we are blinded to?
Aug. 26, 2016 at 1:38 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2016
Posts: 515
Likes: 64
I mentioned this elsewhere, but I highly doubt the Hawks were ever talking to Vermette. Q didn't like something about his game as he trusted him zero in the defensive zone, and it's not surprsing since his defensive numbers have been in the toiler for years now (and his team being bad was not the reason - he was statistically bad compared to other bad guys). I doubt he liked being benched too, so he probably wouldn't have returned the Hawks calls anyway.

Vesey was a good gamble - low risk, high reward kind of gamble that would have be a been cost controlled asset for two years. The Hawks couldn't sign anyone else if they were even slightly interested in Vesey due to the bonus cushion rule. Hudler wasn't even rumored to be talking to the Hawks by anyone legit. He ended up signing with a team that he had a couple of connections with (Nill via Detroit and Hemsky is his friend). Sometimes it's not about what the Hawks did or didn't do - sometimes the players just want to play with their friends or feel other teams are better fits.
See All