SalarySwishSalarySwish

What I would do

Created by: arafay
Team: 2020-21 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 16, 2020
Published: Sep. 17, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Can’t be giving markstrom a gaudy contract imo when the expansion draft is next year and demko is looking like the goaltender of the future. Therefore, I traded for Raanta. Arizona could use a guy like shotgun jake in return. Also throw in baertschi to balance value and salary

I left plenty of space to get 3 depth forwards to fill out the roster
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,000,000
2$1,000,000
1$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$5,500,000
6$5,500,000
1$3,000,000
Trades
1.
2.
VAN
  1. 2020 4th round pick (NSH)
3.
VAN
    Waivers
    Buyouts
    Recapture Fees
    Buried
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the NSH
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the ANA
    2021
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    2022
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    Logo of the VAN
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    20$81,500,000$77,031,878$1,700,000$4,550,000$4,468,122
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,250,000$5,250,000
    C, LW, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,750,000$3,750,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $4,125,000$4,125,000
    C
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,875,000$5,875,000
    RW
    UFA - 2
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LW, C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    LW, RW
    NMC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,000,000$1,000,000
    RW, C
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $900,000$900,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    RD
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $1,050,000$1,050,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $6,000,000$6,000,000
    RD
    NTC
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
    $700,000$700,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Arizona Coyotes
    $4,250,000$4,250,000
    G
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight

    Top Comments

    Sep. 17, 2020 at 7:45 p.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2019
    Posts: 14,042
    Likes: 5,158
    Galchenyuk won’t make 3M IMO
    arafay liked this.
    Sep. 17, 2020 at 8:17 p.m.
    #2
    Best In The World
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 3,272
    Likes: 658
    VAN is not trading for a injury prone goalie.
    remowilliams liked this.
    Sep. 17, 2020 at 8:49 p.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 1,576
    Likes: 732
    I think some of the VAN fans are expecting a lot from their young D prospects. I see a lot of people posting some combination of Rathbone, Juolevi, and Rafferty as their bottom pairing, personally I find this concerning. They are decent prospects however they have a combined 3 NHL games experience, of which one of those games was 8 minutes of play time, that’s asking a lot. I think they should carry 8 D this year and have two of them play in the #7 & 8 spots, get them adjusted, let them develop for a season , or at least until the trade deadline then make a decision on them. Having them on the bottom pairing playing together and banking they will be ok (lots of people say they may not be ready quite yet) seems like a big risk to take, especially if your making Demko your number 1.
    Sep. 17, 2020 at 8:54 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Mar. 2018
    Posts: 7,322
    Likes: 2,384
    Quoting: Reason
    I think some of the VAN fans are expecting a lot from their young D prospects. I see a lot of people posting some combination of Rathbone, Juolevi, and Rafferty as their bottom pairing, personally I find this concerning. They are decent prospects however they have a combined 3 NHL games experience, of which one of those games was 8 minutes of play time, that’s asking a lot. I think they should carry 8 D this year and have two of them play in the #7 & 8 spots, get them adjusted, let them develop for a season , or at least until the trade deadline then make a decision on them. Having them on the bottom pairing playing together and banking they will be ok (lots of people say they may not be ready quite yet) seems like a big risk to take, especially if your making Demko your number 1.


    Not a really a big canucks fans so I don’t know much about all that. Imo they are both ready. As I said, I left 3M to pick and choose whatever depth they want, whether it’s 2f/1d or 1f/2d
    Sep. 17, 2020 at 9:04 p.m.
    #5
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2020
    Posts: 1,576
    Likes: 732
    Quoting: arafay
    Not a really a big canucks fans so I don’t know much about all that. Imo they are both ready. As I said, I left 3M to pick and choose whatever depth they want, whether it’s 2f/1d or 1f/2d


    If you don’t know much about that, how can you say you think their ready? Kind of a contradiction, unless I miss understood.

    Oli, was in the AHL all year, showed some improvement and had a good showing in camp and the 8 minutes he played during the play in. No one thought he was playing the NHL next year until he made the extended roster for the playoffs and now half the fan base is saying he’s ready.

    Rathbone is the best prospect of the 3, likely will develop into a good offensive middle pair. However insiders are split on where he should play next season, some said NHL ready, some said they don’t even think he is currently ready for the AHL next season.

    Rafferty had a great AHL season, played decent in his two games of NHL action last year, he’s definitely the most ready in my opinion, but again if you want to be a playoff team that’s a risk to bank on. Your 3 mil for a depth signing can cover either the left or right side, so your still banking on if then panning our.
    See All