SalarySwishSalarySwish

I dont think OEL has a good contract

Created by: Bcarlo25
Team: 2020-21 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 8, 2020
Published: Oct. 8, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Unless Arizona is eating 2+ million, I’m not interested in OEL. I think Lindholm is a better option, and could be gettable given the recent draft, his limited term, and the state of ANA.

This would be a home run off season, and I do not expect it to happen. It’s a heck of a reach to get Hall at a short term deal for 6 million. This could only happen if he circles the league and doesn’t get the long term offer he wants, and deems boston the best destination to raise his value while chasing a cup short term.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$1,000,000
2$6,000,000
1$1,450,000
Trades
1.
ANA
  1. DeBrusk, Jake [RFA Rights]
  2. Zboril, Jakub [RFA Rights]
  3. 2021 1st round pick (BOS)
Additional Details:
Makes me sick moving debrusk at this point in his career, but lindholm is a heck of a player.
2.
BOS
  1. 2021 5th round pick (NJD)
NJD
  1. Moore, John
  2. 2021 4th round pick (BOS)
3.
BOS
  1. 2021 6th round pick (PIT)
EDM
  1. Ritchie, Nick
Additional Details:
I hate Ritchie so much I want him to wither in Edmonton.
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2023
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$77,122,001$964,222$1,782,500$4,377,999
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 3
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,600,000$1,600,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$5,250,000$5,250,000
C, RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$769,167$769,167 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
RW, C
RFA - 2
$1,450,000$1,450,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,275,000$1,275,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,350,000$1,350,000
RW, C
UFA - 3
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$4,900,000$4,900,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,850,000$2,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$2,250,000$2,250,000 (Performance Bonus$1,250,000$1M)
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
LD/RD
RFA - 2
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Boston Bruins
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Oct. 8, 2020 at 8:53 a.m.
#1
Former Hockey Fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 13,144
Likes: 10,516
That would be weird if Edmonton traded a 6th round pick for about 24 hours of pending UFA Nick Ritchie.
Oct. 8, 2020 at 9:05 a.m.
#2
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,231
Likes: 7,011
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
That would be weird if Edmonton traded a 6th round pick for about 24 hours of pending UFA Nick Ritchie.


Nick ritchie is under contract chief
Kotkaniemi15 liked this.
Oct. 8, 2020 at 9:05 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 12,586
Likes: 5,457
Quoting: Kotkaniemi15
That would be weird if Edmonton traded a 6th round pick for about 24 hours of pending UFA Nick Ritchie.


Wrong Ritchie, that's Brett you're talking about. This is one is Nick, he's got one year left.

That's pretty obvious, the contract is the issue. Lindholm is better and a better option but I'm not sure ANA want to move him. Hall can probably get more money and Ryan should be on 3rd line or pass, he isn't a 4th liner.
Kotkaniemi15 liked this.
Oct. 8, 2020 at 9:14 a.m.
#4
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,231
Likes: 7,011
Quoting: bhavikp27
Wrong Ritchie, that's Brett you're talking about. This is one is Nick, he's got one year left.

That's pretty obvious, the contract is the issue. Lindholm is better and a better option but I'm not sure ANA want to move him. Hall can probably get more money and Ryan should be on 3rd line or pass, he isn't a 4th liner.


Good teams have third liners on the fourth line. That way when a third liner gets hurt. It isn’t a disaster.

The purpose of the hall contract from his side is stated in the description.

I don’t necessarily see the value of Lindholm to ANA, given that they’re horrible, they’ve invested high draft capital in D, and he only has two years left. Unless he’s told them he wants to sign a max term deal there, they should be asking around.
Oct. 8, 2020 at 9:16 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Mar. 2017
Posts: 24,091
Likes: 7,772
"Unless Arizona is eating 2+ million, I’m not interested in OEL. I think Lindholm is a better option"

I couldn't agree more.
See All