SalarySwishSalarySwish

Toews Returns and Trade with Anaheim

Created by: OldNYIfan
Team: 2021-22 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: May 18, 2021
Published: May 18, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
A preliminary exercise based on the premise that Jonathan Toews is able to return next season. (I hope so!) The Ducks trade was suggested by a knowledgeable Chicago fan; he bears the credit, but I'll take the blame.

Expansion Draft protected list: Borgstrom, DeBrincat, Hagel, Kane, Nylander, Rakell, Toews; Keith, Lindholm, Murphy; Lankinen. Qualifying exposures: Carpenter, Connolly; both DeHaan and Stillman; Delia. Exempt: Dach, Kubalik, Kurashev, Suter, Beaudin, Boqvist, Kalynuk. Not sure who Seattle would take, and not sure whether Chicago would re-sign Kampf or Zadorov.

To be honest, I love the trade for Anaheim, but I'm not sure how it fits the Black Hawks.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,750,000
2$2,500,000
2$1,750,000
1$800,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Lindholm, Hampus
  2. Rakell, Rickard
  3. 2021 5th round pick (ANA)
ANA
  1. Mitchell, Ian
  2. Strome, Dylan
  3. 2021 1st round pick (CHI)
Additional Details:
12th overall selection
2.
CHI
SEA
  1. Gaudette, Adam [RFA Rights]
3.
CHI
  1. Honka, Julius [RFA Rights]
DAL
  1. Chalupa, Matej
Additional Details:
Signs a HUGE endorsement deal with Taco Bell
Retained Salary Transactions
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the ANA
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the FLA
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$62,256,926$452,439$4,532,500$19,243,074
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,463,139$2,463,139
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
C
RFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$2,602,778$2,602,778
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$5,538,462$5,538,462
LD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,550,000$4,550,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$850,000$850,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
LD
UFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

May 18, 2021 at 7:37 p.m.
#1
Ban Price trades
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 6,482
Likes: 6,455
I think I understand the sentiment - bring in two quality pieces for one last kick at the can with Kane and Toews - but I can't help but wonder how much losing out on a McTavish or Sillinger plus the quality of player available to the Blackhawks in the 2022 draft sets back the overall Chicago rebuild. All respect due to Reichel, he's not quite at their calibre and the difference between a pick in the 8-12 range is of vastly superior quality to one beyond pick #17.

Currently, there are a plethora of quality RHD at the upper end of the 2022 draft. Can't imagine the combination of both a long-term top-six winger and top-pairing RHD are worth less to the organization than the old core getting mauled by the Avalanche in the first or second round.

Value's there but philosophy dictates a pass. A substantial upgrade over Subban in net to tandem with Lankinen would make more immediate sense for the trade but I still think it's the wrong move.
May 18, 2021 at 8:19 p.m.
#2
Once a Kings Fan Too
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 40,612
Likes: 25,462
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
I think I understand the sentiment - bring in two quality pieces for one last kick at the can with Kane and Toews - but I can't help but wonder how much losing out on a McTavish or Sillinger plus the quality of player available to the Blackhawks in the 2022 draft sets back the overall Chicago rebuild. All respect due to Reichel, he's not quite at their calibre and the difference between a pick in the 8-12 range is of vastly superior quality to one beyond pick #17.

Currently, there are a plethora of quality RHD at the upper end of the 2022 draft. Can't imagine the combination of both a long-term top-six winger and top-pairing RHD are worth less to the organization than the old core getting mauled by the Avalanche in the first or second round.

Value's there but philosophy dictates a pass. A substantial upgrade over Subban in net to tandem with Lankinen would make more immediate sense for the trade but I still think it's the wrong move.


I don't understand your reference to the 2022 draft. Are you thinking of the original formulation by the Chicago fan, which included a 2022 second? I've removed that.
May 18, 2021 at 9:30 p.m.
#3
Ban Price trades
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 6,482
Likes: 6,455
Quoting: OldNYIfan
I don't understand your reference to the 2022 draft. Are you thinking of the original formulation by the Chicago fan, which included a 2022 second? I've removed that.


No, I'm referring to the consequences to going for the playoffs and the impact it may have on their draft selection.

Finishing in a playoff spot guarantees no less than the #17 pick in 2022. Staying the course puts them into the lottery conversation. Given their needs and player availability at that half of the draft, there's more at stake here than the Hawks' 2021 pick. Their losing out on either McTavish/Sillinger now and missing out on a premier defender next year.
OldNYIfan liked this.
May 18, 2021 at 11:40 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2019
Posts: 4,986
Likes: 2,356
Quoting: BeterChiarelli
I think I understand the sentiment - bring in two quality pieces for one last kick at the can with Kane and Toews - but I can't help but wonder how much losing out on a McTavish or Sillinger plus the quality of player available to the Blackhawks in the 2022 draft sets back the overall Chicago rebuild. All respect due to Reichel, he's not quite at their calibre and the difference between a pick in the 8-12 range is of vastly superior quality to one beyond pick #17.

Currently, there are a plethora of quality RHD at the upper end of the 2022 draft. Can't imagine the combination of both a long-term top-six winger and top-pairing RHD are worth less to the organization than the old core getting mauled by the Avalanche in the first or second round.

Value's there but philosophy dictates a pass. A substantial upgrade over Subban in net to tandem with Lankinen would make more immediate sense for the trade but I still think it's the wrong move.


While your points raised are strong, particularly the Goalie issue (can be resolved in FA or trade with Cap Space). I think we have a pressing need for a top LD. Getting someone like Lindholm this season I don't think makes us a playoff in 2022 (still allows us to get a good pick) though as the kids develop moving forward from 2022 we should be looking to achieve playoff hockey. In an ideal world, we would look for a work about way to not include the 2021 first but I think Reichel could represent strong value based on his performance against Men in the DEL the past 2 years. Is he a Stutzle or Draisaitl, absolutely not but he could be serviceable. Who knows what Suter/Kurashev/Borgstrom will turn out also. I would pass on a Sillinger/McTavish for a top LD and have faith in whats in the system if it were up to me.
OldNYIfan liked this.
May 18, 2021 at 11:47 p.m.
#5
Ban Price trades
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 6,482
Likes: 6,455
Quoting: Aussie_Blackhawk
While your points raised are strong, particularly the Goalie issue (can be resolved in FA or trade with Cap Space). I think we have a pressing need for a top LD. Getting someone like Lindholm this season I don't think makes us a playoff in 2022 (still allows us to get a good pick) though as the kids develop moving forward from 2022 we should be looking to achieve playoff hockey. In an ideal world, we would look for a work about way to not include the 2021 first but I think Reichel could represent strong value based on his performance against Men in the DEL the past 2 years. Is he a Stutzle or Draisaitl, absolutely not but he could be serviceable. Who knows what Suter/Kurashev/Borgstrom will turn out also. I would pass on a Sillinger/McTavish for a top LD and have faith in whats in the system if it were up to me.


I think the idea of bringing in such a defenceman only makes sense if there's term involved. As it stands, the Hawks don't have that defender in their system regardless of handedness. They have a plethora of the middle pieces. I still stand by my statement that passing up on a key piece now and later isn't worth a Lindholm rental. Now if there were 3 or 4 years on the deal or Lindholm was an RFA as opposed to a UFA, I think there's merit here but long term it's only detrimental.
See All