SalarySwishSalarySwish

Oilers and Columbus 3 team

Created by: Wadejos123
Team: 2021-22 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 8, 2021
Published: Jul. 8, 2021
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Chicago recieves: Extended Seth Jones, Caleb Jones
CBJ recieves: Ian Mitchell, Mikko Koskinen, 2022 Oilers and Blackhawks 1st round picks
Oilers recieve: 50% retained Strome, 1 mil retained Kieth
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$4,000,000
1$2,200,000
1$900,000
2$1,500,000
2$1,800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
CHI
  1. Jones, Caleb
  2. Koskinen, Mikko
  3. 2022 3rd round pick (EDM)
EDM
  1. Keith, Duncan ($1,000,000 retained)
2.
CHI
  1. Jones, Seth
Additional Details:
7 year x 8,000,000 extention in place
CBJ
  1. Koskinen, Mikko
  2. Mitchell, Ian
  3. Strome, Dylan
  4. 2022 1st round pick (CHI)
  5. 2022 3rd round pick (VGK)
Additional Details:
Strome at 50% and Vegas 3rd flipped to the oilers for Oilers 2022 1st to columbus

It's likley one of the CBJ goalies is moved this offseason. Mikko can serve as the backup for a year or CBJ can buy him out as they enter a retool.
3.
CHI
SEA
  1. De Haan, Calvin ($1,550,000 retained)
  2. Gaudette, Adam [RFA Rights]
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2021
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the FLA
2022
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
2023
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the CHI
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$60,525,881$452,439$4,265,000$20,974,119
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,400,000$6,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,625,000$2,625,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,700,000$3,700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$900,000$900,000
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,800,000$1,800,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$10,500,000$10,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$842,500$842,500 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$2,200,000$2,200,000
C, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,000,000$1,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Columbus Blue Jackets
$5,400,000$5,400,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,850,000$3,850,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$800,000$800,000
G
UFA - 1
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$811,667$811,667 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$6,875,000$6,875,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$1,350,000$1,350,000
LD
RFA - 3
Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
$3,900,000$3,900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jul. 8, 2021 at 5:10 p.m.
#1
Nah.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,472
Likes: 4,353
Koskinen doesn’t fill a need for CBJ/ is a net negative.

And Strome is…fine. Wouldn’t say he moves the needle. If anything, picking him up feels like a favor to CHI?

Plus, if Jones is coming with an extension in place? You bet your ass the return is going to be *big* for CBJ.

All in all, CBJ probably decline.
Jul. 8, 2021 at 5:49 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 19,039
Likes: 9,335
Quoting: dopplsan
Koskinen doesn’t fill a need for CBJ/ is a net negative.

And Strome is…fine. Wouldn’t say he moves the needle. If anything, picking him up feels like a favor to CHI?

Plus, if Jones is coming with an extension in place? You bet your ass the return is going to be *big* for CBJ.

All in all, CBJ probably decline.


How does picking Strome up feel like a favor to Chicago? As in Chicago can't move him for a late 1st?

Columbus isn't in a position of power, in fact they would be better off keeping him till the TDL to maximize their return if that is the strategy.

Not many teams can take on Jone's expected extension cap hit, also coming off a below average year, in flat cap world, and the fact that he is vocal that he wants to test free agency. For that reason, highly unlikely he signs an extension in Chicago...maybe Colorado or a team competing now. If for some reason he does agree to an extension, his value is only what 4 or 5 teams are willing to pay for a guy that wants out and isn't without risk due to his play and in a flat cap world. This is a pretty solid offer. Strome and Mitchell are both worth late 1sts, another 1st rounder, a 3rd and koskinen to balance the cap hit a bit. (3) 1st rounders value wise plus a 3rd is a pretty solid offer.
Wadejos123 liked this.
Jul. 8, 2021 at 7:03 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,287
Likes: 4,932
Quoting: dopplsan
Koskinen doesn’t fill a need for CBJ/ is a net negative.

And Strome is…fine. Wouldn’t say he moves the needle. If anything, picking him up feels like a favor to CHI?

Plus, if Jones is coming with an extension in place? You bet your ass the return is going to be *big* for CBJ.

All in all, CBJ probably decline.


How does you "taking" Strome do us a favor if he's returning you a late 1st in this deal?
Jul. 8, 2021 at 7:31 p.m.
#4
Nah.
Avatar of the user
Joined: Sep. 2020
Posts: 4,472
Likes: 4,353
Quoting: ChiHawk
How does picking Strome up feel like a favor to Chicago? As in Chicago can't move him for a late 1st?

Columbus isn't in a position of power, in fact they would be better off keeping him till the TDL to maximize their return if that is the strategy.

Not many teams can take on Jone's expected extension cap hit, also coming off a below average year, in flat cap world, and the fact that he is vocal that he wants to test free agency. For that reason, highly unlikely he signs an extension in Chicago...maybe Colorado or a team competing now. If for some reason he does agree to an extension, his value is only what 4 or 5 teams are willing to pay for a guy that wants out and isn't without risk due to his play and in a flat cap world. This is a pretty solid offer. Strome and Mitchell are both worth late 1sts, another 1st rounder, a 3rd and koskinen to balance the cap hit a bit. (3) 1st rounders value wise plus a 3rd is a pretty solid offer.


Quoting: Wadejos123
How does you "taking" Strome do us a favor if he's returning you a late 1st in this deal?


Badgering isn’t going to get CBJ to accept an OK offer 🤷‍♂️ I’d counter CBJ are in a great position here. Online Hockey Nerds like us love to badger the point, but Pierre Lebrun and others are reporting trade interest is borderline unprecented. Advanced stats hurt, but you still have a top-pairing, PP leading, offensively driven monster truck of a RH D-Man. His extension may be a pain to negotiate, but not much you can do there.

Which brings us to the supposition in all of this being that he is going to come with a 7x8 extension; Which, btw, if you are trading for him with an extension, you might as well sign and trade for the eighth year to flatten the cap hit.

Point still stands - Koskinen doesn’t do anything, and Strome is…fine. If you truly believe he can net you a late first, then go ahead and ship him off to a playoff team next year. For CBJ, he would just be one of a myriad of Middle-6 centers that we just don’t need. We need a 1C, or someone who can compete as such, and I have a feeling if CHI saw him as one, they wouldn’t be trading him away.

As for what I meant by “favor” - my understanding is CHI has $6M in cap space, eight FA’s, a slew of extensions due up next year, and a desire to be competitive now - why else would we even be hearing they are looking into Jones? I don’t get the impression CHI really sees Strome as part of their long-term plans, so passing him off now instead of having to deal with him next year, and risk another All-Star caliber 17 point season hurting his value, seems to be beneficial to you guys.
Jul. 8, 2021 at 8:04 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 8,287
Likes: 4,932
Quoting: dopplsan
Badgering isn’t going to get CBJ to accept an OK offer 🤷‍♂️ I’d counter CBJ are in a great position here. Online Hockey Nerds like us love to badger the point, but Pierre Lebrun and others are reporting trade interest is borderline unprecented. Advanced stats hurt, but you still have a top-pairing, PP leading, offensively driven monster truck of a RH D-Man. His extension may be a pain to negotiate, but not much you can do there.

Which brings us to the supposition in all of this being that he is going to come with a 7x8 extension; Which, btw, if you are trading for him with an extension, you might as well sign and trade for the eighth year to flatten the cap hit.

Point still stands - Koskinen doesn’t do anything, and Strome is…fine. If you truly believe he can net you a late first, then go ahead and ship him off to a playoff team next year. For CBJ, he would just be one of a myriad of Middle-6 centers that we just don’t need. We need a 1C, or someone who can compete as such, and I have a feeling if CHI saw him as one, they wouldn’t be trading him away.

As for what I meant by “favor” - my understanding is CHI has $6M in cap space, eight FA’s, a slew of extensions due up next year, and a desire to be competitive now - why else would we even be hearing they are looking into Jones? I don’t get the impression CHI really sees Strome as part of their long-term plans, so passing him off now instead of having to deal with him next year, and risk another All-Star caliber 17 point season hurting his value, seems to be beneficial to you guys.


6 mil isn't accounting for seabrook and shaw going to LTIR, which will put us at around 17 mil. Doesn't account for very likley kieth and dehaan trades which will leave us with even more cap. We have plenty of money. CBJ does us no favor by taking cap
See All