SalarySwishSalarySwish

Oilers and Sharks

Created by: AStovetop
Team: 2022-23 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 12, 2023
Published: Jan. 12, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
- Puljujärvi & Merkley both want new scenery. Puljujärvi probably has a bit more value.
- Barabonov is around 60 pt guy on a bad team with 2.5 cap hit for another year after this. Insane Value. I think he would absolutely light it up on Drai's wing.
- Megna is a fantastic stay at home D-man and can play on any pairing (currently on EK65s pairing) could be a good compliment to Barrie. 750k cap hit for another year gives him great value.
Trades
SJS
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse
  2. 2023 1st round pick (EDM)
  3. 2023 2nd round pick (EDM)
  4. 2024 5th round pick (EDM)
Additional Details:
2023 2nd Upgrades to 2024 1st if Oilers make the Western Conference Finals
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2023
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VAN
2024
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2025
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$82,500,000$74,330,001$0$0$8,169,999
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$6,750,000$6,750,000
C
NMC
UFA - 8
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,725,000$4,725,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$3,000,000$3,000,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,050,000$1,050,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,025,000$1,025,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$950,000$950,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,000,000$2,000,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,250,000$3,250,000
LD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$835,000$835,000
LD
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, C
RFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000$250K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jan. 12, 2023 at 12:55 p.m.
#1
go Sharks go
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 867
Likes: 399
I think SJ accepts

Merkley for Puljujarvi is probably pretty close
and I like Barabanov + Megna for those picks
Jan. 12, 2023 at 4:45 p.m.
#2
train, train
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 733
I'd prefer keeping Barabanov as a key guy that drives this team, and don't think his stats and advanced metrics tell the story of how valuable he is to the team.

That said, this seems like an offer too good to refuse if the Sharks decide to rebuild over the next few years and don't intend to try and compete with Bedard next season after tanking this season. If they intend to compete next season though, I wouldn't do it. Just depends on which direction they decide to take the team on.
Jan. 12, 2023 at 5:04 p.m.
#3
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 877
Quoting: CheechYou
I'd prefer keeping Barabanov as a key guy that drives this team, and don't think his stats and advanced metrics tell the story of how valuable he is to the team.

That said, this seems like an offer too good to refuse if the Sharks decide to rebuild over the next few years and don't intend to try and compete with Bedard next season after tanking this season. If they intend to compete next season though, I wouldn't do it. Just depends on which direction they decide to take the team on.


They will not be competitive next year, at least not enough to keep him around and lose him to free agency. He's a very good player on a wasted contract. Maybe 2 years they'll be vying for a Wild Card spot but he'll be a free agent and past his prime by then.
Jan. 12, 2023 at 5:39 p.m.
#4
train, train
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,027
Likes: 733
Quoting: AStovetop
They will not be competitive next year, at least not enough to keep him around and lose him to free agency. He's a very good player on a wasted contract. Maybe 2 years they'll be vying for a Wild Card spot but he'll be a free agent and past his prime by then.

Their potential competitiveness next season really depends on what they choose to do beginning at this trade deadline and into the draft and free agency. The Sharks -- and Sheng recently wrote an article that supports this claim -- are really not nearly as bad as their current record indicates. The players/coaches themselves have alluded to this. They're very much in games this season, they've just been experts at throwing games away in the 3rd with dumb mistakes.

I made an armchair gm yesterday that's an example of how the Sharks can be competitive again next season: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/3855852. Just depends on both their decision on where they want to take the team and ability to execute that vision.
Jan. 12, 2023 at 5:54 p.m.
#5
Stovetop
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 877
Edited Jan. 12, 2023 at 6:04 p.m.
Quoting: CheechYou
Their potential competitiveness next season really depends on what they choose to do beginning at this trade deadline and into the draft and free agency. The Sharks -- and Sheng recently wrote an article that supports this claim -- are really not nearly as bad as their current record indicates. The players/coaches themselves have alluded to this. They're very much in games this season, they've just been experts at throwing games away in the 3rd with dumb mistakes.

I made an armchair gm yesterday that's an example of how the Sharks can be competitive again next season: https://www.capfriendly.com/armchair-gm/team/3855852. Just depends on both their decision on where they want to take the team and ability to execute that vision.


Yeah I commented on that thread too. Trading Meier hurts any chance at getting more competitive and the NJ deal would never get done, as Mercer is not going anywhere.

Edit: You also Have Eklund, Bordeleau, Robins, and Bedard in our top 9. You cannot rely on 4 rookies to suddenly take over the production on the team. That's with the 8.5% chance that we even get Bedard (as of now).
See All