SalarySwishSalarySwish

change team

Created by: Cozens42
Team: 2024-25 Buffalo Sabres
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 6, 2023
Published: Dec. 6, 2023
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
NHL talent needs to be added this offseason. Let the prospects play in ROCH and if it's obvious they're too good then they can get their chance.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,600,000
7$6,475,000
3$2,599,998
3$1,785,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,800,000
4$6,000,000
1$2,000,000
1$1,399,998
Trades
1.
2.
BUF
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (SJS)
SJS
  1. Skinner, Jeff ($1,200,000 retained)
  2. 2025 2nd round pick (BUF)
Additional Details:
Skinner has been scoring but his overall impact is detrimental. LAST in the entire league in xga/60. Kills the pp. Blindly throws the puck around. Not sure what a trade would even look like but I could see a team like SJS valuing him as a way to bridge some of their prospects until they're ready
3.
BUF
  1. Dellandrea, Ty [RFA Rights]
DAL
  1. Krebs, Peyton [RFA Rights]
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
2025
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the NSH
2026
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the BUF
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$87,500,000$83,860,233$0$3,025,000$3,639,767

Roster

Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,142,857$7,142,857
C
M-NTC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,750,000$4,750,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$6,475,000$6,475,000
LW, C
RFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$855,833$855,833
LW, RW
RFA - 1
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LW
UFA
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$2,625,000$2,625,000
C, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$7,100,000$7,100,000
C, LW
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$1,785,000$1,785,000
RW
RFA
$1,399,998$1,399,998
RW, LW
UFA
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$11,000,000$11,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 8
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,599,998$2,599,998
G
RFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$8,350,000$8,350,000
LD/RD
UFA - 7
$2,000,000$2,000,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$4,285,714$4,285,714
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$2,600,000$2,600,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
G
RFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$525,000$525K)
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Buffalo Sabres
$3,333,333$3,333,333
RD
UFA - 2

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Dec. 6, 2023 at 1:15 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 3,284
Likes: 2,098
A harsh reality is for the moment, no worthwhile UFA (there are so few to begin with) or player with a NTC is coming here. Their best bet is to jettison the veterans who are occupying spots otherwise meant for younger high upside players. Even if that team is young and is inconsistent, at minimum you raise their potential ceiling and make the fun to watch. And they can grow together under a new leadership group.
Kyle_Okposo_Lover liked this.
Dec. 6, 2023 at 1:41 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2021
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 514
If his overall impact is “detrimental” you are paying way more than that for us to take on like 8m for the next few or so years lol
Dec. 6, 2023 at 1:43 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2017
Posts: 8,252
Likes: 6,238
I agree with the Skinner thing, unfortunately he has a ntc and he only wanted to play for buffalo or toronto. Also, he is way overpaid, offense only wingers making 9 million are not players other teams are gonna want. I remember hearing the brindamour stuff, he said he was glad Skinner was gone and you couldn't win with guys like him. It's nice that he is sticking up for granato, seems a bit self serving though. As for some of the other stuff, I thought lablanc was an awful hockey player, maybe I heard wrong, I don't watch many Sharks games. Not sure why ostlund for cates would be a thing, I think ostlund has been developing as expected for a mid first, hopefully he kills it at the world juniors. I'm not suggesting that he, or any of our players are off limits, I think you are selling awfully low here. Finally, my own preference is to sell mittelstadt for a physical defensive d, we need at least one of our top 3 centers to play a 200 foot game and be able to win faceoffs, Thompson and cozens are already signed long term and would be my choices to keep. Agree or disagree, not sure how much any of it matters, adams and granato would need to lose a dozen more games in a row before pegula would even consider firing them, I can't imagine any big changes unless that happens.
Dec. 6, 2023 at 2:31 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 153
Likes: 18
Quoting: Letsgosharks
If his overall impact is “detrimental” you are paying way more than that for us to take on like 8m for the next few or so years lol


He'd be the team's leading scorer. I could see the Sharks seeing value in him despite his defensive deficiencies. Give the younger prospects someone who can help develop their offensive games.
Dec. 6, 2023 at 2:38 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 153
Likes: 18
Quoting: sabres89
I agree with the Skinner thing, unfortunately he has a ntc and he only wanted to play for buffalo or toronto. Also, he is way overpaid, offense only wingers making 9 million are not players other teams are gonna want. I remember hearing the brindamour stuff, he said he was glad Skinner was gone and you couldn't win with guys like him. It's nice that he is sticking up for granato, seems a bit self serving though. As for some of the other stuff, I thought lablanc was an awful hockey player, maybe I heard wrong, I don't watch many Sharks games. Not sure why ostlund for cates would be a thing, I think ostlund has been developing as expected for a mid first, hopefully he kills it at the world juniors. I'm not suggesting that he, or any of our players are off limits, I think you are selling awfully low here. Finally, my own preference is to sell mittelstadt for a physical defensive d, we need at least one of our top 3 centers to play a 200 foot game and be able to win faceoffs, Thompson and cozens are already signed long term and would be my choices to keep. Agree or disagree, not sure how much any of it matters, adams and granato would need to lose a dozen more games in a row before pegula would even consider firing them, I can't imagine any big changes unless that happens.


Maybe i'm being overactive but Cozens is so frustrating. His first two years were not impressive and last year I feel like his offensive metrics were inflated by the team's style of play and a ton of scoring off the rush. His defensive play was bad last season and hasn't improved at all this year. His puck skills and instincts are non-existent. Casey has improved so much and has fixed a main part of his game that was his main weakness; puck protection in the offensive zone. I don't think they need to make a decision this offseason but as of now, long-term, I would choose to keep Tage and Casey. Hopefully Savoie or Kulich can be impact players at C too.
sabres89 liked this.
See All