SalarySwishSalarySwish

Saros to LAK

Created by: Ledge_And_Dairy
Team: 2023-24 Los Angeles Kings
Initial Creation Date: Feb. 20, 2024
Published: Feb. 23, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
I think the return is still a little light but I wanted to see if the cap could work without Nashville retaining on Saros. The Preds only have 1 retention slot left this year and I think that will be used on either Carrier or Trenin as I'm not sure there will be a buyer for Barrie. Could always have a 3rd team retain instead
Trades
LAK
  1. Saros, Juuse
  2. Trenin, Yakov ($850,000 retained)
NSH
  1. Arvidsson, Viktor
  2. Grundström, Carl
  3. Turcotte, Alex
  4. 2024 1st round pick (LAK)
  5. 2025 2nd round pick (LAK)
Retained Salary Transactions
Termination Fees
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
2025
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
2026
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
Logo of the LAK
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$83,500,000$83,051,667$0$4,712,500$448,333
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
LW, C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$10,000,000$10,000,000
C
NMC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$5,500,000$5,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,200,000$4,200,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$5,500,000$5,500,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$7,875,000$7,875,000
RW, LW
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C
UFA - 8
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$875,000$875,000
RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$850,000$850,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,675,000$1,675,000
C
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$775,000$775,000
RW, C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$4,125,000$4,125,000
LD
UFA - 8
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$11,000,000$11,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Nashville Predators
$5,000,000$5,000,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$5,875,000$5,875,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,000,000$1,000,000 (Performance Bonus$1,000,000$1M)
G
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,000,000$1,000,000
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
RFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$775,000$775,000
C, LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Los Angeles Kings
$1,500,000$1,500,000
G
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Feb. 23 at 5:51 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 27,795
Likes: 14,521
I think that 2025 pick needs to atleast be a conditional (win 2 rounds it becomes a 1st) or something
Ledge_And_Dairy liked this.
Feb. 23 at 5:56 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,357
Likes: 19,581
Quoting: littlejerryseinfeld
I think that 2025 pick needs to atleast be a conditional (win 2 rounds it becomes a 1st) or something


I think that's reasonable. I was thinking maybe another prospect but I can't see LA moving someone like Spence without a LD coming back
Feb. 23 at 5:56 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 14,550
Likes: 6,145
Honestly, I don't see either team interested in this.

Trotz was quoted as saying to Saros that he's not going to consider trading him unless a "franchise altering player" that's "too good to pass up" is offered in return. Nothing like that is going to Nashville here.

It makes no sense for LA to give up a Kings' ransom for Saros now. They're not able to negotiate an extension until July 1, and paying a huge haul before then gives Saros' camp a ton of leverage in contract negotiations, just like it did last year for Gavrikov. Blake couldn't afford to let Gavrikov walk after giving up a 1st round pick for a rental, so Gavrikov took him to the cleaners and extorted an extra $1M AAV out of the Kings because he knew Blake would pay whatever he wanted. Saros could tell Blake that he wants the Bobrovsky contract, otherwise he's going to test UFA.

Any deal for Saros won't happen until July 1, and will either be for a return suitable for 1 year of a quality goaltender (i.e. significantly less than the reported asking price), or with a signed extension in place at the time of the trade.
Feb. 23 at 5:57 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2017
Posts: 7,626
Likes: 5,216
The picks aren't enough value, and I don't see NSH having much interest in any of those players. They aren't going to looking to add depth wingers, when they've got Tomasino, Evangelista, Pärssinen, Kemell, L'Heureux, Schaeffer, Afanasyev etc., all vying for roster spots now and in the near future.
Feb. 23 at 6:01 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,357
Likes: 19,581
Quoting: tkecanuck341
Honestly, I don't see either team interested in this.

Trotz was quoted as saying to Saros that he's not going to consider trading him unless a "franchise altering player" that's "too good to pass up" is offered in return. Nothing like that is going to Nashville here.

It makes no sense for LA to give up a Kings' ransom for Saros now. They're not able to negotiate an extension until July 1, and paying a huge haul before then gives Saros' camp a ton of leverage in contract negotiations, just like it did last year for Gavrikov. Blake couldn't afford to let Gavrikov walk after giving up a 1st round pick for a rental, so Gavrikov took him to the cleaners and extorted an extra $1M AAV out of the Kings because he knew Blake would pay whatever he wanted. Saros could tell Blake that he wants the Bobrovsky contract, otherwise he's going to test UFA.

Any deal for Saros won't happen until July 1, and will either be for a return suitable for 1 year of a quality goaltender (i.e. significantly less than the reported asking price), or with a signed extension in place at the time of the trade.


Can you link where Trotz said that? I also said that this probably isn't enough for Nashville in my description.

I think you are being pretty unreasonable with your expectations from the LA POV. Even if Saros were to ask for 10M (though I imagine it will be more in like with the Hellebuyck deal) it's the exact same year that the Gavrikov contract comes off the books.
See All