SalarySwishSalarySwish

Habs

Created by: Campabee
Team: 2024-25 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: Mar. 29, 2024
Published: Mar. 29, 2024
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Sorry to my Ducks friends, it had to be done after last night, it's a total joke directed towards management
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,250,000
2$2,250,000
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. Hronek, Filip [RFA Rights]
VAN
  1. Matheson, Michael
  2. 2025 2nd round pick (MTL)
2.
MTL
  1. 2025 3rd round pick (BOS)
  2. 2026 2nd round pick (BOS)
3.
ANA
  1. Anderson, Josh
  2. 2024 1st round pick (WPG)
Additional Details:
Relax, this is just a joke directed at the mismanagement of the Ducks after last night's benching
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2024
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MIN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the EDM
Logo of the WSH
2025
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the DET
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
2026
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the MTL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$83,500,000$64,636,250$1,022,500$3,977,500$18,863,750
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$950,000$950,000 (Performance Bonus$3,500,000$4M)
RW, LW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,875,000$7,875,000
C
UFA - 6
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,362,500$3,362,500
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$7,850,000$7,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 7
Logo of the Anaheim Ducks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
C, LW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$835,000$835,000
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,400,000$3,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,900,000$2,900,000
C, LW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$6,500,000$6,500,000
RW, LW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$1,700,000$1,700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$897,500$897,500
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$420,000$420K)
LD/RD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,150,000$3,150,000
G
UFA - 3
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
RFA
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$890,000$890,000
G
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$867,500$867,500 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
LD
RFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$875,000$875,000
RD
RFA - 2
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$766,667$766,667
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$10,500,000$10,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Montreal Canadiens
$812,500$812,500
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Mar. 29 at 4:39 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 10,364
Likes: 3,994
i think you missed the "relax, this is a joke" part on the other two trades too.
Mar. 29 at 4:40 p.m.
#2
Avid Nucks fan
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2022
Posts: 635
Likes: 315
Edited Mar. 29 at 4:49 p.m.
Since Pettersson is re-signed Matheson to Van is never gonna happen. Return for Hronek would be a young prospect RHD or top six forward with size and a pick.
Wqrrior and Warpbox liked this.
Mar. 29 at 4:42 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,557
Likes: 6,455
Quoting: Wqrrior
i think you missed the "relax, this is a joke" part on the other two trades too.


Not really Hronek for Matheson isn't far off and was even proposed earlier today or yesterday by someone and Canucks fans didn't mind it too much (I just couldn't remember the details lol) and no one (especially me) cares what Bruins fans think about anything lol
Mar. 29 at 4:47 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Feb. 2019
Posts: 10,364
Likes: 3,994
Quoting: Campabee
Not really Hronek for Matheson isn't far off and was even proposed earlier today or yesterday by someone and Canucks fans didn't mind it too much (I just couldn't remember the details lol) and no one (especially me) cares what Bruins fans think about anything lol


There's no grounds to the Canuck deal. Getting older for a slight cap decrease for a LHD when our right side is weak would be an awful move. Matheson may have had a decent year, but its more than likely a one off, and certainly not worth getting older for. I dont think the difference in value is only a 2nd either, but its the fit that doesnt make sense more than the value.
Warpbox liked this.
Mar. 29 at 5:30 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2018
Posts: 15,557
Likes: 6,455
Quoting: Wqrrior
There's no grounds to the Canuck deal. Getting older for a slight cap decrease for a LHD when our right side is weak would be an awful move. Matheson may have had a decent year, but its more than likely a one off, and certainly not worth getting older for. I dont think the difference in value is only a 2nd either, but its the fit that doesnt make sense more than the value.


I get the fit isn't right but the value is similar. Both players are having career years in terms of points. Both player previously have set their previous career highs in each of the last 3 seasons. They are only 4 years apart in age, have similar cap hits but Matheson has an additional 2 years on his team friendly deal. I do agree that Hronek has slightly more value being a RHD and slightly younger but I don't think it's more than a 2nd. This all seems like the Reilly vs Hronek argument from earlier today
See All