SalarySwishSalarySwish

Rebuild the Right Way

Created by: delneggs
Team: 2018-19 New York Rangers
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 13, 2018
Published: Jun. 13, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Legend
Left Handed
Original Team
Waivers Exempt
Right Handed
Position
Trade Clause
Max Perf. Bonus
Expiry Status
Term Remaining
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
Waivers ExemptMcDavid, Connor
$12,500,000 (Performance Bonus$250,000)
C
NMC
UFA - 5
Description
Rebuild through the draft.

NO to 27+ year old expensive free agents.

NO to long term contracts for 27+ year old players.

NO to taking on bad contracts for assets just because we have cap space.

YES to more trades for draft picks in 2019 and 2020.

Yes to signing some older, gritty players to short term (2-year) deals to protect the kids and provide much needed grit.

YES to playing an in your face, hard to play against, style of hockey. I hope Quinn means it.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$850,000
2$850,000
4$4,500,000
5$4,500,000
2$3,500,000
1$4,000,000
2$1,750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,500,000
2$1,500,000
2$3,000,000
2$1,750,000
Trades
1.
NYR
  1. 2018 7th round pick (VGK)
CAR
  1. Staal, Marc ($2,850,000 retained)
2.
NYR
  1. 2019 2nd round pick (FLA)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the VGK
2019
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the FLA
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the BOS
2020
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the NYR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$79,500,000$74,755,276$0$2,582,500$4,744,724
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$4,625,000$4,625,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
UFA - 4
$925,000$925,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C
UFA - 1
$3,150,000$3,150,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C, LW
RFA - 3
$1,850,000$1,850,000
RW
UFA - 2
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$350,000$350K)
C, LW
UFA - 3
$1,500,000$1,500,000
RW
UFA - 2
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$850,000$850,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD
UFA - 6
$6,650,000$6,650,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
$8,500,000$8,500,000
G
NMC
UFA - 3
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RD
UFA - 1
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
UFA - 2
$4,350,000$4,350,000
LD/RD, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$1,750,000$1,750,000
RD
UFA - 3
$850,000$850,000
D
UFA - 1
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight

Top Comments

Jun. 13, 2018 at 7:08 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2016
Posts: 2,933
Likes: 362
still teams may not want staal on that price either.....and there is his mmc. if you think Pateryn is an NHLer, he'll get more than 1.750.
Jun. 13, 2018 at 10:20 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 6,731
Likes: 1,559
Quoting: clark
still teams may not want staal on that price either.....and there is his mmc. if you think Pateryn is an NHLer, he'll get more than 1.750.


you're not wrong about Staal. But I don't get your quibble with Pateryn. Matt Cane has him at 1.575. He's actually at the high side here... and he's a few hundred thousand high on Cole and Reaves. (which all make up for being short on Maroon)

But my issue is not maximizing assets at all. He says he wants to rebuild through the draft, But instead of maximizing the value of team control by dealing Namestnikov and Zuccarello for picks, he just either signs them for lazy short term deals or keeps them. That's just bad asset management. Among other issues here.
Jun. 13, 2018 at 11:53 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
Zucc and Namestinkov will bring better deals at the trade deadline so why trade them now? This is just step 1 in the rebuild. At the trade deadline you trade those guys to maximize the return.

And no way Staal turns down a chance to play with his brother in Carolina.

I am a little high on Reaves, Cole and Pateryn because I would want them for 2 years and not longer, so offer them more for shorter terms. If Maroon needed a little more, fine, the cap space is there.
Jun. 13, 2018 at 7:09 p.m.
#4
DanzhastheTouch
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 218
Likes: 29
Going by your concepts, Cole, Pateryn and Zuccarello shouldn't be there. You should be re-signing Spooner to replace Zuccarello. Gilmour should be trade bait, or just traded, since you have numerous offensive defensemen.

Rebuilding through the draft makes sense; though, there's nothing wrong with adding depth in veterans, but they should be on one-year deals. By 2019-20, young Dmen like Lindgren, Hajek and Day should be either NHL rookies or sophomores.
Jun. 13, 2018 at 9:57 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 3,629
Likes: 1,515
I doubt your getting any of these guys to sign a 1 year deal. Why would they when they can get 2 or 3 year deals elsewhere. That's why I overpaid them a little to take 2 year deals. If the youngsters are ready to play in the NHL in a year, so be it, they are cheap and there is cap room to move them up and trade a Cole or a Pateryn if needed. However, if they need a few years to develop in Hartford, we have vets that can man the shop.
See All