Edmonton is offering:


Claesson
2019 5th
2018 7th


Yohann Auvitu
Connor Brickley
2018 4th

I don't see any reason not to do it. I want to know what you think but even if you don't want to do it, whether i do it or not depends on your reason. We're getting a depth LHD replacement and a 4C upgrade (i think he's an upgrade over Thompson). We're giving up 2 picks and getting 1, but we're getting the best pick in the deal. It's pretty much
Claesson for a 4th
5th for Brickley
7th for Auvitu

IMO we should do it @HoffmanisKing

Never mind, Auvitu can't be traded. But i still think it works if we either replace him with someone else or take out Auvitu and the 7th, cause we're still getting a 4C upgrade and we're getting a 4th for Claesson.

Yeah, sounds good.

Alright, idk if they're gonna accept it or not but if they accept Claesson and a 5th for Brickley and a 4th it's a deal. @HoffmanisKing

If we want Lehner we'll need to move out Condon. If we get offered a 4th should we take it? Or even a 5th maybe? Or do you think that's a little low?

A 5th or a 4th is good preferably a 4th.

I think a 2018 6th is fine instead of a 2019 5th in the Claesson-Brickley trade if they want it, right?

Claesson, 2018 6th
for
Brickley, 2018 4th
If they accept it it's a deal, idk if they're gonna accept it or not but if they do it's a deal @HoffmanisKing

ok, they want Claesson, a 2019 5th, and a 2018 7th for Brickley and a 2018 4th. What's your opinion on this @HoffmanisKing? Should we do it?

No that’s terrible we’re giving up more picks then what we get back and the difference between a 5th round pick and 4th round pick isn’t all that much.

Plus brickley isn’t even good.

He's an upgrade over Thompson

I see Claesson and Brickley as a 1 for 1 and a 5th + 7th for a 4th isn’t too good.

If you see it as Brickley for Claesson straight up being fair, then if we get a 4th for a 5th and a 7th i think that makes sense, especially because we have 3 7ths this year @HoffmanisKing

Oh ya I forgot we had 3 ok I guess it’s good.

I'll go try and get it done

@HoffmanisKing they just need to accept it and it's a deal.

What should we offer for Connor Sheary?

I don't think we're getting Fischer, they want a lot.

I think Mitchell is a UFA after the year. @HoffmanisKing should we move him for a 4th if we can get that?

I don’t really like Sheary.



Oh ok.


Yes.

Never mind, Sheary's a LW i guess. Just so you know @HoffmanisKing Edmonton said no to the Claesson deal. I think we should probably keep him if we can't get a 4th.

About Mitchell, IMO a 5th is probably good if we can't get a 4th, agreed?