SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

TDL moves

Created by: bigbrit93
Team: 2017-18 Boston Bruins
Initial Creation Date: Jan. 15, 2018
Published: Jan. 15, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
BOS
  1. Johnson, Jack
  2. 2018 4th round pick (CBJ)
CBJ
  1. Spooner, Ryan
  2. 2018 3rd round pick (BOS)
2.
BOS
  1. 2018 4th round pick (CHI)
3.
VAN
  1. Vatrano, Frank
  2. 2018 4th round pick (BOS)
Buyouts
Buried
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the CBJ
Logo of the CHI
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2019
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
2020
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
Logo of the BOS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$75,000,000$69,583,811$0$1,190,000$5,416,189
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$6,125,000$6,125,000
LW
NMC
UFA - 8
$6,875,000$6,875,000
C
NMC
UFA - 5
$6,666,667$6,666,667
RW
UFA - 6
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$400,000$400K)
RW, LW
UFA - 3
$7,250,000$7,250,000
C
NMC
UFA - 4
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$872,500$872,500
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$900,000$900,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
$4,500,000$4,500,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 4
$775,000$775,000
LW
UFA - 1
$725,000$725,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
$742,500$742,500 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
$808,750$808,750
C, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$4,000,000$4,000,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 1
$916,667$916,667 (Performance Bonus$500,000$500K)
RD
UFA - 2
$7,000,000$7,000,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
$4,357,143$4,357,143
LD
UFA - 1
$789,167$789,167 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
RD
UFA - 2
$1,200,000$1,200,000
G
UFA - 1
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
UFA - 3
$2,500,000$2,500,000
RD
UFA - 3
$858,750$858,750
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jan. 15, 2018 at 2:56 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 196
Likes: 4
Why would the bruins want to get rid of Vatrano? Especially for that little
Jan. 15, 2018 at 3:16 p.m.
#2
Sergeant
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 486
Likes: 64
J. Johnson has already stated (publicly) that he wants to go to a team where he can play top 4 for the rest of his career; w/ Chara and Krug he will not get that opportunity in BOS. He would be a rental. He's looking for top dollar to bounce back from his bankruptcy in 2014 before he retires + he doesn't care about winning a Cup. Why would you want his drama in BOS?

I wouldn't be so quick to trade McQuaid. It will be interesting to see what he brings to the team once he's back from his injury. Plus his trade value will go up considerably if he's healthy and producing as part of the team as opposed to ditching him now just because we've been doing fine w/o him. Plus we're doing fine carrying his cap hit.

Vanek is washed up; but in spite of that fact he is still worth more than Vatrano and a 4th. That said I wouldn't give up either for Vanek. I really see this as a lose/lose for both teams.
Jan. 15, 2018 at 4:10 p.m.
#3
BreKel
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,537
Likes: 460
Quoting: LilAdriel
Why would the bruins want to get rid of Vatrano? Especially for that little


Because he's a nothing player who would be lost on waivers for nothing. You may want to take a look at his recent stats. He's played in 20-22 games and has 2 goals. He's pretty meh at this point.
Jan. 15, 2018 at 4:26 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Nov. 2017
Posts: 972
Likes: 108
I'm not sure if you were the one who did a mock just like this but I personally don't like Johnson as a fit or even Vanek on our team. No reason for either. Johnson isn't "dependable" and Vanek..... why? Cehlarik and Bjork can come back up in 10-20 games and be better.

Worst case scenario is that a top 6 player goes down and someone gets bumped up and the void created gets filled by Czarnik who's earned a better shot this year. He was the least sucky player when he was stuck with Beleskey and Hayes at times last season, so this guy deserves a shot with 2 competent line mates. He wasn't good this season, but I'd rather see him in there than Vatrano at this point.

If All Vanek costed was Vatrano and a 4th then I'd take it immediately. I wouldn't be doing it for Vanek to play on our team, but I'd take that trade and then send him somewhere else for more. If Martin Hanzal was worth a 1st and a 2nd last season then Vanek's gotta be worth atleast a 2nd at this point.
Jan. 15, 2018 at 4:55 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2016
Posts: 196
Likes: 4
Quoting: BreKel
Because he's a nothing player who would be lost on waivers for nothing. You may want to take a look at his recent stats. He's played in 20-22 games and has 2 goals. He's pretty meh at this point.


Quoting: BreKel
Because he's a nothing player who would be lost on waivers for nothing. You may want to take a look at his recent stats. He's played in 20-22 games and has 2 goals. He's pretty meh at this point.


Ur right. Oops. I thought he was doing better than that
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll