Huge no from edmonton

Ahhh idk but why not. Id try to keep keith and send seabrooke instead

No thanks, Kane’s a unique talent and one of the best in the league, but he’s paid 10.5 mill paid winger, Keith is a 34 year old #1 Defenseman who’s on a good, but long contract, passed his prime. Anisimov is a good 2nd line center. So why are we trading all of that to Chicago? No deal.

The value isn’t close as it is, Seabrook instead of Keith almost furthers the distance from unfair to fair.

Duncan Keith is well past his prime. He's done. This season proved it.

Yea ok....

Keith is still a top 2 defenseman without a doubt, and teams in need of a top 2 D would give up a haul for him and his cheap contract.

Keith could fetch easily a 1st round pick, top prospect and a top 6 forward or #3-4 defenseman - perhaps even more.

Nah mate, Keith will be burnt up by seasons end. He's playing 24+ min a night at the age of 35, with no goals and a staggering -13. He's still a 3-4 dman sure, but he wouldn't be able to fetch top blue chip prospects as you say. Probably a 1st, and a good young player (Galch, Drouin) Those types of players.

Keith could easily fetch a roster player, top prospect and a 1st.

Yea, the Hawks have had a bad season, but that should have been expected considering they lost Panarin, Hossa, Hjalmarsson, Campbell, Kruger, Darling ... The Hawks lost a lot of players and they were replaced with Bouma, Wingles and Sharp.... Not to mention the Hawks have played 14 rookies regularly this season..

The Hawks standing isn't a reflection of Keith's play.

I can't see Bowman trading Keith because the Hawks aren't even close to rebuilding but if he did - Keith would fetch a lot... He's still a legitimate first pairing defenseman on an excellent contract.

Teams like Edmonton, Toronto and Tampa Bay would love to get him but I don't see Bowman trading him.