besides the chucky and san jose trade, not bad

i agree until the last 2 trades i was like '' i think this is a 5/5 ''
i mean i think that third for NSH should be conditional 2nd if plekky plays more then 50% of the playoffs .
but outside that pretty good .

Indeed. However asking for Thomas AND Kyrou will have the Blues management refuse the offer . It should be just patches for Thomas IMO.

What about like Thomas or Kyrou, Kaspick, 2nd and 3rd?

good question. to be honest I don't know much about him so I won't talk through my hat here. I guess that could be possible? anyone else has an opinion on this?

only if you forgot STL has no 1st this year to negotiate with like the rest of the teams in the NHL offering up a pick in the 15th-31st spot in the deepest draft for D since 2003 when NSH drafted Suter,Weber,and Klein

a late 2nd wouldnt even get them a seat at the big boy table with teams like EDM,CGY,CAR,MIN,CAR and LA linked to the Captain STL has to step it up
LA has Vlardi who's tearing up Jr right now so even if STL offered all this its still likely not enough if an LA offers up a Vlardi or CAR offers up a Rask or Miller (debate there who's going out so Miller can come up or if Miller goes)

Friendly word of advice: please structure your sentences a bit better, or use punctuation a bit more, as it's hard to figure out what you're trying to say. Which is a shame, really because it seems like you might have had somewhat of a valid point.
That being said, I'd have to agree that a late 2nd wouldn't cut it.

dude , the english language was designed to carry the Context of statements so we can communicate.
people far smarter then you or i suck grammatically which is why only lesser minds try being Grammar Nazi's

i am not here to treat things like university paper and bend over backward to structure my sentence's because people find them hard to skim thru, that's their issue.


Friendly Word of Advice , if you have to offer up Grammar Lessons dont contribute to a conversation perhaps you should not comment . (at least not to me as i find the concept arrogant at best )

chill, I wasn't attacking you personally or you point for that matter (I'll kindly let slide the "lesser minds" comment), nor am "offering grammar lessons. I said that because I've seen you have valid points and I legit had a hard time figuring out what you were trying to say and I actually wanted to know what your argument was. I'd say that's contributing a whole lot more to the conversation than whining about grammar nazis and arrogance and whatnot. My comment was earnest and devoid of condescension. So don't be so defensive and get off your high horses, it makes you look childish. Anyways, I'll look forward to actually talking hockey with you in the future