Quoting: Capitalfail67
Imo that changes once caeey middle whatever starts playing. He’ll end up being better and more positive and eichel will be out
Yep. O'Reilly is already a good bit better, defensively. Nothing wrong with having center depth, but Kuznetsov's not too bad, either.
Quoting: mhockey91
Clearly everyone except caps fans agrees with my statement ?? stop being bias. Remove eichals first season and the last two years he’s been nearly a PPG on a terrible team with little support. Kuzy is a product of his great team, not to say kuzy isn’t a great player, but he’s nowhere on the level of eichal.
Put it this way, I’m a pens fan, and if Pittsburgh were to trade say Malkin (whose MUCH better than kuzy), a first and sprong which is a much better package, Buffalo would STILL decline it
I've noticed that some guys get the same point totals no matter how many games or minutes they get. Like, Crosby or Gaborik get a ton of points per game in the years they sit out half the season with hurt feelings, but then they come back and play a full year, and they still only have the same two or three hot streaks, and a few random assists in between. I'd point out that this is because they are people, and not video game simulations, but even the video game simulations have had hot and cold streaks for at least a decade.
Eichel has between 22 and 24 goals in each of his three seasons. He has 32 or 33 assists each season. Whether a player goes through two months of the season as "slumping" or as, "injured," they are subject to the same physical limitations. A lot of people have absolute opinions about which shows more toughness, but I think it comes down to what the team needs.
And to say that Eichel had no support? On a team with Ryan O'Reilly, Evander Kane, Kyle Okposo, Rasmus Ristolainen, Reinhart, etc... it doesn't make sense. Buffalo has no depth, at any position, so they lose a ton of games, which might be demoralizing, but they have enough skill guys that they should never be shut out. Does Eichel have more potential than Kuznetsov? Sure. He's four years younger and averages two more goals per season (over the three years they've both been full time NHLers). Does he have a late 1st round pick's worth of extra talent? Hard to say.
Kuznetsov has led the Caps in points a couple of times. He's rarely injured. He skates really well. He makes passes Eichel wouldn't dream of. I just don't think throwing in a first pick to get a guy who's four years younger and just as good makes that much sense. There's certainly a chance that a wing like Ovechkin or Oshie can turn Eichel around, and get him producing up to the expectation of his contract. Maybe the Caps trade Kuznetsov and Burakovsky to find out? That way at least the trade is cap-neutral.
I think it's worth noting that Kuznetsov didn't fall to the Caps because there were better players. He fell to the Caps because at the time, the KHL budget was about equal to the NHL's, and the KHL was making noises about not letting its best young players leave for the NHL. In other words, the Caps were the only team optimistic enough to think they'd be able to afford Kuznetsov. It didn't hurt that they figured he'd like to play with Ovechkin, of course, but if the draft had been entirely based on hockey considerations, he'd have been a top five pick, too.