SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Center Help/Draft Assets = Desperately Needed

Created by: Oggsford_Blues
Team: 2018-19 Montreal Canadiens
Initial Creation Date: May 9, 2018
Published: May 9, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Debated between signing Bozak and Stas but I figured Bozie has probably had it with the intense Canadian media scrutiny. Stastny allows the Drouin center experiment to mercifully end.

I really like the Bjugstad deal here - it allows MTL to move Patches (to a destination he apparently wanted) and pick up two excellent assets in the process. Bjugstad can handle 2C duties and keep Danault from having to play over his head on the second line, and that pick is inside the top 35.

As you can see it was a clear mission to reaccumulate draft capital, and we have done that in adding 4 picks in 2018 while also picking up a future NHL LHD in Sulak (Moore is keeping his seat warm for a year or two).

MTL can easily go careening into the abyss if they fail to properly utilize Drouin, Zadina, Galchenyuk. I have given each of these guys capable centers who befit their respective roles. If Chucky still struggles then I move him midseason, possibly to PHI for young D prospect(s).

Next year, I would try to move Alzner to free up some breathing room. Most likely would package him with Lindgren in order to receive a positive return.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$3,300,000
2$850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
Zadina, Filip
3$925,000
2$2,500,000
3$6,750,000
Trades
1.
MTL
  1. Bjugstad, Nick
Additional Details:
2018 2nd round pick (#34 overall, originally from AZ)
FLA
  1. Pacioretty, Max ($1,500,000 retained)
2.
MTL
  1. Sulak, Libor
Additional Details:
2018 3rd round pick (#81 overall, originally from PHI)
2018 6th round pick (#159 overall, originally from MTL)
DET
  1. Hudon, Charles
  2. Schlemko, David ($1,000,000 retained)
3.
MTL
    2018 6th rounder (#186 overall, originally from NSH)
    Retained Salary Transactions
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2019
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    2020
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    2021
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    Logo of the MTL
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$78,000,000$72,962,975$0$782,500$5,037,025
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 5
    $6,750,000$6,750,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 3
    $3,750,000$3,750,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 3
    $839,166$839,166
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    $2,050,000$2,050,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 3
    $4,900,000$4,900,000
    LW, C, RW
    UFA - 2
    Zadina, Filip
    $925,000$925,000
    $3,300,000$3,300,000
    C
    UFA - 3
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$175,000$175K)
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    $1,166,667$1,166,667
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    $850,000$850,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    $3,900,000$3,900,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 4
    $950,000$950,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 2
    $650,000$650,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    $748,333$748,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
    LD/RD
    UFA - 2
    $7,857,143$7,857,143
    RD
    UFA - 8
    $10,500,000$10,500,000
    G
    NMC
    UFA - 8
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    LD
    UFA - 5
    $5,500,000$5,500,000
    RD
    M-NTC, NMC
    UFA - 3
    $750,000$750,000
    G
    UFA - 3
    $4,625,000$4,625,000
    LD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 4
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
    RD
    UFA - 2
    $725,000$725,000
    LD
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    May 9, 2018 at 10:26 a.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2017
    Posts: 1,725
    Likes: 430
    I like it!
    May 9, 2018 at 10:30 a.m.
    #2
    BigBeardBurns
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2018
    Posts: 3,350
    Likes: 535
    I dont get the Det trade, but the rest is cool.
    Oggsford_Blues liked this.
    May 9, 2018 at 10:34 a.m.
    #3
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 19,593
    Likes: 6,733
    I think Pacioretty with 50% retained gets a better return. Mayeb Habs have to add a little something extra but that 1st rounder should be their goal. Not the 2nd rounder.

    I see no point in the Detroit deal. Hudon had 30 points last year and had a really bad SH %, he was unlucky that means. Under normal circumstances he could of been a 40 poitn guy easily. He isn't a shoe in for a deal. Get rid of Schlemko for a late pick but keep Hudon. Sulak is already 24 its not like your getting a 20 year old here. If he is ready in a couple years he'll already be in his prime by that point. If you not an NHL'er before entering your prime age, I think you are simply not that good. Obviously there are exceptions but don't gamble a Hudon for that hope that Sulak at 26 is an NHL'er...
    Oggsford_Blues liked this.
    May 9, 2018 at 10:39 a.m.
    #4
    Thread Starter
    Ducks Fly Together
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2016
    Posts: 259
    Likes: 80
    Quoting: BigBeardBurns
    I dont get the Det trade, but the rest is cool.


    Cheers for the rating. DET trade is necessitated by adding Zadina. Hudon was productive in his first extended look with MTL, scoring 30 points in 72 games this year. With Drouin, Zadina, Lehkonen on the left side, there is no space for Hudon to carve out a meaningful role. Wings can probably fit him onto their 3rd line.

    I also wanted to move Schlemko off this roster and I felt that especially at a cap hit of 1M, DET considers him an improvement to their LD core of DDK, Ericsson, and Ouellet. Personally, I am really low on Ericsson. Just about every time I watch the Wings his lack of speed and ability with the puck seems to stand out.

    MTL is happy to add the picks, clear some roster clutter, and get Sulak to marinate in the minors for a year or two.
    May 9, 2018 at 10:42 a.m.
    #5
    Subbanator
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 7,416
    Likes: 3,384
    Seen this Florida trade on here earlier and I stick to my opinion that you can’t get fair value out of that trade unless it includes a first round pick, not a second. Bjugstad has never eclipsed 50 points, even when playing on the top line last season. Pacioretty to Florida will put him on the top line with Barkov, for the first time in his career he will have an actual center, that means he could produce better then he has before in his career. Even if he goes back to his career average he is still a 60 point player that in that top six puts them back into the playoff picture.

    While MTL adds a roster player that we hope will be able to carry the load as a 2C but probably forced into a bigger role, he might get 40-50 points. 34th overall is definitely the better side of the second round but still not high enough.

    This is a trade MB has to get right, trading a proven 60 point player for a guy who would set career highs by getting 50 and has never gotten over 45 playing center, is not getting it right.

    Especially since Florida doesn’t even want Bjugstad to play center, they have to many centers and are trying to get the best left wing or top four defenceman possible.
    Oggsford_Blues liked this.
    May 9, 2018 at 10:45 a.m.
    #6
    Thread Starter
    Ducks Fly Together
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2016
    Posts: 259
    Likes: 80
    Quoting: F50marco
    Hudon had a really bad SH %


    Didn't know this, thanks! If Habs keep Hudon, where do you see him fitting in to the lineup, assuming Drouin goes back to LW?

    I agree that more salary retention=more value, but don't sleep on the value of a #34 overall pick! If FLA was willing to part with their 1st then I think this deal would have happened at the deadline.

    Yes, Sulak is 24 already but has only played 2 pro games in North America, as he spent most of this past season in the Finnish top league picking up over 0.75 PPG. I remember watching him at a World Juniors and thinking that despite his size and physical play, he had excellent skating ability.
    May 9, 2018 at 10:48 a.m.
    #7
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jun. 2017
    Posts: 247
    Likes: 35
    Great starting and I agree with the others thinking that we could perhaps squeeze a bit more out of DET if Hudon is part of the deal. Ouellet was on the block with DET so maybe ...
    Oggsford_Blues liked this.
    May 9, 2018 at 10:49 a.m.
    #8
    Thread Starter
    Ducks Fly Together
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2016
    Posts: 259
    Likes: 80
    Quoting: Subbanator7667
    This is a trade MB has to get right, trading a proven 60 point player for a guy who would set career highs by getting 50 and has never gotten over 45 playing center, is not getting it right.


    @F50marco Do you guys think that Patches (50% RS) for Bjugstad + FLA 2018 1st (#15) is 'getting it right?' Seems better to me. I think any Patches trade also should have the condition of an extra 1st or at least a 2nd if he re-signs.
    May 9, 2018 at 11:07 a.m.
    #9
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 19,593
    Likes: 6,733
    Quoting: Oggsford_Blues
    @F50marco Do you guys think that Patches (50% RS) for Bjugstad + FLA 2018 1st (#15) is 'getting it right?' Seems better to me. I think any Patches trade also should have the condition of an extra 1st or at least a 2nd if he re-signs.


    Yes i do but in negotiations things always get stretched out more than what we think so i could see the Habs adding something to help nudge Florida. Maybe its a prospect like McCarron and a 3rd or something. And as for a conditional if Pacioretty doesn't sign, I think that's a given but I'd also be feeding Tallon all the details of any discussions on Pacioretty's new potential contract so he knows what to expect. This trade doesn't happen unless Pacioretty is at least willing to go to Florida long term. Given that the Panthers are an up and coming team I can't see why he wouldn't want to. I know GM can't officially talk contract extensions until July 1st but you'd be naive to think they aren't doing quietly behind closed doors.
    Oggsford_Blues liked this.
    May 9, 2018 at 1:03 p.m.
    #10
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2017
    Posts: 274
    Likes: 24
    Quoting: F50marco
    I think Pacioretty with 50% retained gets a better return. Mayeb Habs have to add a little something extra but that 1st rounder should be their goal. Not the 2nd rounder.

    I see no point in the Detroit deal. Hudon had 30 points last year and had a really bad SH %, he was unlucky that means. Under normal circumstances he could of been a 40 poitn guy easily. He isn't a shoe in for a deal. Get rid of Schlemko for a late pick but keep Hudon. Sulak is already 24 its not like your getting a 20 year old here. If he is ready in a couple years he'll already be in his prime by that point. If you not an NHL'er before entering your prime age, I think you are simply not that good. Obviously there are exceptions but don't gamble a Hudon for that hope that Sulak at 26 is an NHL'er...


    How about Bjugstad, Hawyrluk,5th rd in 2018 and a third in 2019 (the 3rd into a second round if he resigns if he doesn't it goes away) for Patches and 2018 3rd?
    May 9, 2018 at 1:15 p.m.
    #11
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2015
    Posts: 19,593
    Likes: 6,733
    Quoting: daveyyz
    How about Bjugstad, Hawyrluk,5th rd in 2018 and a third in 2019 (the 3rd into a second round if he resigns if he doesn't it goes away) for Patches and 2018 3rd?


    Either the roster player has to be better or the picks and prospects need to be better. One or the other.

    That 1st 2018 is the main thing the Habs need. Habs don't just need centers, they need impact centers. You get those by getting lucky in the first round and drafting one. (Or super lucky by a team trading one to you) Sticking Out Tongue

    Any deal that doesn't at least involve a 1st round pick is a failure by MB. That is the prerequisite in any Pacioretty trade. Its a must. Everything from there on is negotiated on.
    May 9, 2018 at 1:29 p.m.
    #12
    Subbanator
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jul. 2017
    Posts: 7,416
    Likes: 3,384
    Quoting: Oggsford_Blues
    @F50marco Do you guys think that Patches (50% RS) for Bjugstad + FLA 2018 1st (#15) is 'getting it right?' Seems better to me. I think any Patches trade also should have the condition of an extra 1st or at least a 2nd if he re-signs.


    Quoting: F50marco
    Yes i do but in negotiations things always get stretched out more than what we think so i could see the Habs adding something to help nudge Florida. Maybe its a prospect like McCarron and a 3rd or something. And as for a conditional if Pacioretty doesn't sign, I think that's a given but I'd also be feeding Tallon all the details of any discussions on Pacioretty's new potential contract so he knows what to expect. This trade doesn't happen unless Pacioretty is at least willing to go to Florida long term. Given that the Panthers are an up and coming team I can't see why he wouldn't want to. I know GM can't officially talk contract extensions until July 1st but you'd be naive to think they aren't doing quietly behind closed doors.


    I think that it being 15th overall would be getting it right. Montreal could throw in either a 3rd or a 4th with that, they have three 4th round picks so losing even their third isn't a huge deal. @F50marco is right though, contract talks have to be disclosed, Pacioretty could ask for $6 million +. He might take a discount though because of the tax in the state, so if he takes a team friendly 6 year 5.5 - 6 million dollar deal in Florida then Montreal should have a conditional pick if that happens.

    Montreal needs to be going into this draft looking to make it as significant as their 2007 draft. That year they had two first round picks and 3 second round picks, in those picks they took Ryan McDonough #12, Max Pacioretty #22 and PK Subban #46. This year they are coming into it with #3, #35, #38 and two more that are going to be in the top 50. Using Max to get into the first round will be another big piece, especially a top 15 pick where we might be able to get Bode Wilde, Jespero Kotkanimaki or Joe Veleno depending on who drops.

    Excited to see what happens but should be interesting to see where MB goes.
    Oggsford_Blues liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll