SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Under or overpayment?? (COL)

Created by: JeffW
Team: 2018-19 Colorado Avalanche
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 4, 2018
Published: Sep. 4, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Keeping in mind cap space and how Edm needs wingers and not centreman, do you think they'd do this deal?
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
Bowers, Shane
3$875,000
Trades
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2020
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
2021
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
Logo of the COL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
25$79,500,000$73,143,095$0$2,165,000$6,356,905
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$5,571,429$5,571,429
LW, C
M-NTC
UFA - 3
$6,300,000$6,300,000
C
UFA - 5
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW, C
UFA - 1
$885,833$885,833 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
C
UFA - 2
$8,500,000$8,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 7
$1,400,000$1,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$2,850,000$2,850,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$100,000$100K)
C, RW
UFA - 1
$1,975,000$1,975,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
$3,937,500$3,937,500
C, LW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
RW
RFA - 5
Bowers, Shane
$875,000$875,000
$925,000$925,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$950,000$950,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$3,450,000$3,450,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 5
$5,900,000$5,900,000
G
UFA - 1
$2,500,000$2,500,000
LD
UFA - 1
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
$3,333,333$3,333,333
G
UFA - 3
$2,150,000$2,150,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LD/RD
UFA - 2
$1,450,000$1,450,000
LD
UFA - 2
$717,500$717,500 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 4, 2018 at 12:06 p.m.
#1
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 43,172
Likes: 24,063
I don't think Edmonton would want something like this. They might do something like Klefbom and Draisaitl for Barrie + Jost + pick
Sep. 4, 2018 at 12:15 p.m.
#2
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,187
Likes: 1,650
Quoting: csick
I don't think Edmonton would want something like this. They might do something like Klefbom and Draisaitl for Barrie + Jost + pick


I think I'd counter with draisaitl for barrie and kerfoot
Sep. 4, 2018 at 12:17 p.m.
#3
KFTW
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 43,172
Likes: 24,063
Quoting: JeffW
I think I'd counter with draisaitl for barrie and kerfoot


I think that would be fair value for both teams. I can see Edmonton doing it
Sep. 4, 2018 at 12:32 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 748
I don’t believe that’s the package the Oilers would ask for. I think Draisait and Klefbom for Rantanen, Makar and a 2019 first. No reason for Oilers to trade Draisaitl unless it’s for something huge.
Sep. 4, 2018 at 12:43 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,187
Likes: 1,650
Quoting: Smokingun71
I don’t believe that’s the package the Oilers would ask for. I think Draisait and Klefbom for Rantanen, Makar and a 2019 first. No reason for Oilers to trade Draisaitl unless it’s for something huge.


That's so outrageously one sided that you'd think you are a leafs fan... rantanen for driasitl is basically a lateral trade, not to mention we have no need for klefbolm. Makar and our 1st are worth way more than klefbolm... this isnt a trade to help EDM become a powerhouse, it's a trade that would help both teams become better, secondary scoring for Col and RHD scoring and cap relief if you go for the barrie trade listed above
tp47 liked this.
Sep. 4, 2018 at 12:43 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 148
Likes: 48
Quoting: Smokingun71
I don’t believe that’s the package the Oilers would ask for. I think Draisait and Klefbom for Rantanen, Makar and a 2019 first. No reason for Oilers to trade Draisaitl unless it’s for something huge.


I agree with holding out for a big return for Draisaitl. That being said, I think Rantanen is pretty much untouchable and I doubt COL moves Makar.

I think moving Draisaitl for Barrie + would fill needs for EDM. Other option that I would see is moving Draisaitl in a 3-team trade to make room for EK.
Sep. 4, 2018 at 12:47 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 748
Quoting: JeffW
That's so outrageously one sided that you'd think you are a leafs fan... rantanen for driasitl is basically a lateral trade, not to mention we have no need for klefbolm. Makar and our 1st are worth way more than klefbolm... this isnt a trade to help EDM become a powerhouse, it's a trade that would help both teams become better, secondary scoring for Col and RHD scoring and cap relief if you go for the barrie trade listed above


I agree it favours the Oilers but why would the Oilers move Draisaitl who is a top line centre unless a top line player is coming back?? Draisaitl doesn’t get traded unless it blows the doors off period! The original trade proposed here is just as one sided as mine in favour of the Avs. Oh and by the way the Avs are my second favourite team after the Oilers so I don’t want them getting fleeced any more then I do my Oilers.
Sep. 4, 2018 at 12:49 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,616
Likes: 748
Quoting: tp47
I agree with holding out for a big return for Draisaitl. That being said, I think Rantanen is pretty much untouchable and I doubt COL moves Makar.

I think moving Draisaitl for Barrie + would fill needs for EDM. Other option that I would see is moving Draisaitl in a 3-team trade to make room for EK.



As much as Rantanen is untouchable, I would think Draisaitl is as well unless a player of his caliber is included in the trade. I agree my proposal was one sided but the original proposal for Draisaitl was just as much in my opinion for the Avs.
Sep. 4, 2018 at 12:50 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,187
Likes: 1,650
Quoting: Smokingun71
I agree it favours the Oilers but why would the Oilers move Draisaitl who is a top line centre unless a top line player is coming back?? Draisaitl doesn’t get traded unless it blows the doors off period!


Obviously because they have a need, having to many scoring centreman, nobody on the right side blue line, a 50-60 pt defense for 3 mill less than a 70 pt centre plus a pick is a fair value
Sep. 4, 2018 at 12:53 p.m.
#10
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 942
Likes: 207
nvm
Sep. 4, 2018 at 1:15 p.m.
#11
MK458
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2017
Posts: 2,110
Likes: 931
Yeah no. Drai is locked up for 7 more years, and center depth is the name of the game right now. It would take a big overpayment to get him
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll