SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Krug

Created by: AIRWICK
Team: 2018-19 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 12, 2018
Published: Sep. 12, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
BOS
  1. Dillon, Brenden
  2. Merkley, Ryan
  3. 2019 2nd round pick (FLA)
  4. 2020 2nd round pick (SJS)
  5. 2021 5th round pick (SJS)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2019
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2020
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the OTT
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$79,500,000$74,379,584$0$1,457,500$5,120,416
Left WingCentreRight Wing
$5,000,000$5,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 1
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
UFA - 4
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 7
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
$717,500$717,500 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
RW, LW
UFA - 1
$700,000$700,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$894,167$894,167 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
$2,937,500$2,937,500
C
UFA - 2
$1,900,000$1,900,000
RW
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
C
UFA - 1
$650,000$650,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$833,750$833,750
C
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
$5,280,000$5,280,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 7
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 6
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 8
$3,800,000$3,800,000
RD
UFA - 2
$1,900,000$1,900,000
G
UFA - 2
$650,000$650,000
LD
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
RD
UFA - 2
$650,000$650,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 12, 2018 at 10:55 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
As a Bruins fan - Yes, Please.
Sep. 12, 2018 at 10:55 a.m.
#2
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
I see this kinda thing all the time. You don't want to give up anything that would hurt, so you give up 5 okay things. If you want a 59 point d man, the price tag will hurt. Also trust me, you don't want Krug on your top pair
Mikker575 liked this.
Sep. 12, 2018 at 10:57 a.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,505
Likes: 4,566
For an elite point producer from the bankend, this deal doesn't really get me excited. Boston has a ton of LHD prospects in the pipeline + Chara, Moore and Grz on the roster (not including Krug). If Boston is trading Krug, it's for help up front.
Sep. 12, 2018 at 11:25 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2016
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 639
Quoting: Bcarlo25
I see this kinda thing all the time. You don't want to give up anything that would hurt, so you give up 5 okay things. If you want a 59 point d man, the price tag will hurt. Also trust me, you don't want Krug on your top pair


Quoting: ON3M4N
For an elite point producer from the bankend, this deal doesn't really get me excited. Boston has a ton of LHD prospects in the pipeline + Chara, Moore and Grz on the roster (not including Krug). If Boston is trading Krug, it's for help up front.


You really don't like this? this is basically a 1st, (2) 2nds and Dillion (who you could probably deal for a 2nd or 3rd). it could enable them to move one of their D prospects or Merkley in the future. It also frees up another 2m to add as needed at the deadline.

Merkley is a RD
Sep. 12, 2018 at 11:55 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 11,505
Likes: 4,566
Quoting: Propeller09
You really don't like this? this is basically a 1st, (2) 2nds and Dillion (who you could probably deal for a 2nd or 3rd). it could enable them to move one of their D prospects or Merkley in the future. It also frees up another 2m to add as needed at the deadline.

Merkley is a RD


Not really. With the current core, Boston has a smaller window to win with them. Dillion is the only piece that would play right away. Merkley maybe makes the jump in a year or two, but by then the window is almost shut for the current core. The picks are just wild cards and it could be as much as 4-5 years if they make the NHL. It just doesn't seem like a move that makes sense for Boston's current situation.
Propeller09 liked this.
Sep. 12, 2018 at 12:08 p.m.
#6
Bcarlo25
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 21,147
Likes: 6,988
Quoting: Propeller09
You really don't like this? this is basically a 1st, (2) 2nds and Dillion (who you could probably deal for a 2nd or 3rd). it could enable them to move one of their D prospects or Merkley in the future. It also frees up another 2m to add as needed at the deadline.

Merkley is a RD

Merkley is an interesting prospect, but here are three reasons why I'm not interested:
1. When a d man puts up that many points in junior and is picked in the 20s, there's a reason for it.
2. With Carlo, mcavoy, Miller, and Zboril (who has frequented the right side), I see no need for a right d.
3. Bergeron, krejci, Marchand, tuukka, and Chara aren't exactly young. This isn't the time to trade for the future. By all means, trade Krug, but do it for an established top six forward with term
Propeller09 liked this.
Sep. 12, 2018 at 1:24 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 164
Likes: 17
Quoting: Bcarlo25
Merkley is an interesting prospect, but here are three reasons why I'm not interested:
1. When a d man puts up that many points in junior and is picked in the 20s, there's a reason for it.
2. With Carlo, mcavoy, Miller, and Zboril (who has frequented the right side), I see no need for a right d.
3. Bergeron, krejci, Marchand, tuukka, and Chara aren't exactly young. This isn't the time to trade for the future. By all means, trade Krug, but do it for an established top six forward with term


I think sjs is looking more for offensive assets right now (to replace Thornton/Pavelski) - look what they offered to Tavares and their rumoured interest in Panarin.

About Merkley being draft at 20s, I heard that his attitude might be the problem (but look what they did with E. Kane in sjs), for example Zadina, was supposed to be 3rd or 2nd, ended up 6th, because other teams did not want winger. Edmonton drafted Bouchard because he is more NHL ready than Merkley, so I think these are another reasons why Merkley ended up after 20s.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll