SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Canucks Lineup at the Deadline with trades

Created by: GM_moode
Team: 2018-19 Vancouver Canucks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 20, 2018
Published: Sep. 21, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Trades
1.
VAN
  1. 2019 5th round pick (MTL)
  2. 2020 4th round pick (VGK)
Additional Details:
Granlund isn't a bad player however, he doesn't fit with the team long term. The trade frees up a roster spot and allows the Canucks to play a younger guy while getting some picks in return.
VGK
  1. Granlund, Markus
Additional Details:
Vegas has tons of picks. In addition Granlund is a upgrade to some of the Vegas's bottom six players. This is a team poised to make a run so an extra body is always useful
2.
VAN
  1. 2020 5th round pick (WSH)
Additional Details:
Canucks get a pick for a player that hasn't shown much offense to keep him long term.
WSH
  1. Gaunce, Brendan
Additional Details:
Caps get a cheap option to play on their fourth line.
3.
VAN
  1. Bracco, Jeremy
  2. Gauthier, Frédérik
  3. 2020 5th round pick (TOR)
Additional Details:
The Canucks get a younger player who has tons of upside in Bracco, plus an older player who needs a fresh start in Gauthier.
TOR
  1. Kero, Tanner
  2. Tanev, Christopher
Additional Details:
The Leafs have the leagues top forward group, they have a talented goaltender; however, their defense is still the same and has holes. Adding a player like Tanev (if healthy) would give the leafs a solid top pairing and improve the teams only weakness.
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2018
2019
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the MTL
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the VAN
2020
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
2021
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
Logo of the VAN
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$79,500,000$59,159,513$852,847$3,912,500$20,340,487
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,125,000$4,125,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,366,666$3,366,666
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
C, LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$6,000,000$6,000,000
LW, RW
NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$650,000$650,000
LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,375,000$4,375,000
RW, C
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,835,000$2,835,000
RW, C
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,325,000$2,325,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$3,666,667$3,666,667
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,800,000$2,800,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,500,000$2,500,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$4,000,000$4,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,900,000$1,900,000
LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$2,650,000$2,650,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$1,100,000$1,100,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Vancouver Canucks
$650,000$650,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 21, 2018 at 9:50 a.m.
#1
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
If the Leafs toss a 1st rounder, would Vancouver be willing to retain half his salary?
Sep. 21, 2018 at 10:11 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Oct. 2017
Posts: 251
Likes: 22
this is the first decent tanev to toronto trade i've seen
Sep. 21, 2018 at 3:00 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2018
Posts: 122
Likes: 29
Quoting: LoganOllivier
If the Leafs toss a 1st rounder, would Vancouver be willing to retain half his salary?


if the Leafs threw in a 1st....... they would certainly pick up $2M of his salary (45%)
Sep. 26, 2018 at 8:30 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 653
Likes: 185
Great proposals. Personally, I like Granlund and feel he fits better long term just because the Canucks are going to have an influx of young players coming up soon and Granny is a good two-way player. I'd honestly rather see Goldobin or Baertchi go for two reasons.

1: They would fetch more in return, setting the Canucks up a little better for the future
2: With Lind, Dahlen, and whoever they select at the 2019 draft (assuming it's a forward) in the system, the offence provided by either Bae or Goldy will be easily replaced in a year or two

Other than that, this is probably one of the most realistic proposals I've seen for the Canucks (especially Tanev) and I would 100% be thrilled if GMJB did all this.
Sep. 26, 2018 at 10:57 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Vancity
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 116
Likes: 8
Quoting: LoganOllivier
If the Leafs toss a 1st rounder, would Vancouver be willing to retain half his salary?


Honestly I don't even think it would take a first rounder for the Canucks to retain salary. It would make sense for the Leafs given their cap situation moving forward, and it wouldn't dramatically hinder the Canucks given their cap situation either. If I where the Canucks I would willingly retain half if the Leafs where throwing in a 2nd round pick or a decent prospect, let alone a first round pick.
Sep. 26, 2018 at 10:59 p.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Vancity
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 116
Likes: 8
Quoting: Cs_7
this is the first decent tanev to toronto trade i've seen


Thank You! How do you think that it could be worked out to make it fairs for either side? I'm personally a big fan of Bracco and thinks he has tons of potential so if I where the GM of the Canucks he would be a must for me in any Tanev trade, asides form this I would be more than willing to adjust the trade.
Sep. 26, 2018 at 11:01 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Vancity
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 116
Likes: 8
Quoting: BStockHockey
if the Leafs threw in a 1st....... they would certainly pick up $2M of his salary (45%)


100%, I would say that a first would be generous if even if the Canucks retained 50%. I think in that case the Canucks could add some conditions to the first pick in terms of how successful the Leafs are with Tanev for the two years that they would have him for.
Sep. 26, 2018 at 11:08 p.m.
#8
Thread Starter
Vancity
Avatar of the user
Joined: Aug. 2017
Posts: 116
Likes: 8
Quoting: ItsBlowTime
Great proposals. Personally, I like Granlund and feel he fits better long term just because the Canucks are going to have an influx of young players coming up soon and Granny is a good two-way player. I'd honestly rather see Goldobin or Baertchi go for two reasons.

1: They would fetch more in return, setting the Canucks up a little better for the future
2: With Lind, Dahlen, and whoever they select at the 2019 draft (assuming it's a forward) in the system, the offence provided by either Bae or Goldy will be easily replaced in a year or two

Other than that, this is probably one of the most realistic proposals I've seen for the Canucks (especially Tanev) and I would 100% be thrilled if GMJB did all this.


I personally like Granny too. I just think that with the additions this offseason the Canucks already added a ton of two-way players (although I think the Granlund is the best offensive player of the ones added). His role on the team for the next few years and spot on the team is kind of redundant, especially when the team is trying to incorporate younger players.

I can see what you mean with Baer and Goldobin, if a guy like Lind or Dahlen makes the team the offense that they provide would likely replace Baer and Goldy. In this case I would personally explore a trade for Baertschi. The Canucks would likely get more for Baertschi than Goldobin, and the aim at this point should still be to see what you have with Goldy (and regardless his trade value is probably terrible) . Even if he doesn't pan out the Canucks didn't give much to get him, this is the same with Baertschi, and I wouldn't be opposed to the Canucks cashing out on that trade with Calgary. What return do you think either Baertschi or Goldobin could get?
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll