SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Next Season

Created by: Earth
Team: 2019-20 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 26, 2018
Published: Sep. 26, 2018
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Breadman returns
Dzingel plays for his home town.
Boqvist has potential to be in the lineup.

Gain a struggling forward in Ryan while losing a struggling d man. Can be rewarding if he plays like he did during 2017 playoffs. Either way this frees up cap space faster than with seabs contract.

Robin Lehner has posted a .916 during his time in buffalo. Imagine what he can do with a team in front of him.


Then for the 20-21 season we have to resign debrincat. Theres about 4 mil to spend. Plus roughly 2 mil the cap will increase. Crawford contract ends, he won't be getting 6 mil again with all these injury stuff going on. I think that is safe to say we will have enough to resign him. And if he wants a high number, we can likely sign him to a bridge deal with Kane toews and Ryan's contract expiring.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$1,250,000
2$1,000,000
5$5,500,000
3$2,500,000
1$900,000
1$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
5$8,000,000
2$1,500,000
4$3,500,000
3$3,000,000
Trades
1.
CHI
    Picks/prospects at 2019 deadline. Team unknown.
    2.
    CHI
      For whatever with whoever. 2019 deadline
      3.
      CHI
      1. Ryan, Bobby
      Additional Details:
      Ryan Dzingel. During 2018-19 season.

      Sens finally get rid of Ryan's contract (3 years) but take on Seabs lower contract (5 years). Seabrook joins an obsolete d group and mentors young players.
      OTT
      1. Saad, Brandon
      2. Seabrook, Brent
      Additional Details:
      Throw in picks and prospects as necessary.

      I wouldn't give up 1st round, Boqvist or jokiharju. But whatever it takes to get rid of Seabrook. Seabrook would have to waive his NMC but maybe they do some insider stuff we don't know about.
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2020
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      2021
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      2022
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      Logo of the CHI
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      23$81,500,000$69,774,294$0$3,415,000$11,725,706
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the Ottawa Senators
      $7,250,000$7,250,000
      RW, LW
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $10,500,000$10,500,000
      C
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$32,500$32K)
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      $8,000,000$8,000,000
      LW
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $5,500,000$5,500,000
      RW, C
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $2,625,000$2,625,000
      RW
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,850,000$3M)
      LW, RW, C
      UFA - 1
      $3,500,000$3,500,000
      LW, RW, C
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $2,500,000$2,500,000
      LW, RW, C
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $775,833$775,833 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $1,250,000$1,250,000
      C, LW
      RFA
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $750,000$750,000
      C, LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $5,538,462$5,538,462
      LD
      NMC
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $3,850,000$3,850,000
      RD
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $6,000,000$6,000,000
      G
      M-NTC, NMC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $1,000,000$1,000,000
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $1,200,000$1,200,000
      LD
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
      RD
      RFA - 2
      $1,500,000$1,500,000
      G
      UFA - 1
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $706,666$706,666
      C, LW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $900,000$900,000
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the Chicago Blackhawks
      $800,000$800,000
      LD
      UFA - 2

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Sep. 26, 2018 at 11:00 p.m.
      #1
      Chicago
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2015
      Posts: 7,002
      Likes: 2,852
      I feel like Chicago loses that Ottawa deal just because Saad was supposed to be and is still considered to be an important piece.
      Sep. 26, 2018 at 11:08 p.m.
      #2
      Kyle from Chicago
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2018
      Posts: 9,905
      Likes: 5,888
      Quoting: NickC1988
      I feel like Chicago loses that Ottawa deal just because Saad was supposed to be and is still considered to be an important piece.


      I don’t like to advertise, but why don’t you go check out my last post and see if that’s better. I agree that’s to much to give up while taking Ryan back.
      Sep. 26, 2018 at 11:19 p.m.
      #3
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jul. 2018
      Posts: 801
      Likes: 162
      Melnyk is too cheap for that deal. He only saves 375K on the Ryan/Seabrook difference and has to pay Seabs an extra two years. Plus the 6 mil tag on Saad.
      Sep. 27, 2018 at 1:34 a.m.
      #4
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2018
      Posts: 832
      Likes: 717
      aa
      Sep. 27, 2018 at 1:40 a.m.
      #5
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2018
      Posts: 832
      Likes: 717
      Edited Sep. 27, 2018 at 2:08 a.m.
      Quoting: Stan_Bowman
      I don’t like to advertise, but why don’t you go check out my last post and see if that’s better. I agree that’s to much to give up while taking Ryan back.


      I don't see them taking Seabrook's contract without us taking on Ryan's. We get rid of that cap space in three years compared to what would be five. Get him out of Ottawa to reboot his career, he has the potential to be a 20 goal scorer, 50+ points again. He is similar to Saad in terms of production, they were actually 2 points apart last season while Ryan played 20 less games. And imagine if Ryan plays like his old self. 2017 he had a terrible season but in playoffs he produces 15 points in 19 games, showing he still has it. Even if he doesn't produce those numbers, I would rather have a struggling forward at that cap hit than a struggling defensemen. We have a ton of defense prospects and there will be no room for Seabrook in the lineup the way he's been playing. And for Saad, he is not as advertised and he will disappoint yet again this season in my opinion. Bringing back old pieces hasn't worked all these times Bowman has done it. I don't see it working with Saad. Getting rid of him frees up the cap space for Panarin. Who I think we all agree, we'd love to have back. Also, Dzingel is on the come up, he will be a great sign for whoever gets him if he hits free agency this upcoming offseason.
      Sep. 27, 2018 at 10:03 a.m.
      #6
      Kyle from Chicago
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2018
      Posts: 9,905
      Likes: 5,888
      Quoting: JonSnow88
      I don't see them taking Seabrook's contract without us taking on Ryan's. We get rid of that cap space in three years compared to what would be five. Get him out of Ottawa to reboot his career, he has the potential to be a 20 goal scorer, 50+ points again. He is similar to Saad in terms of production, they were actually 2 points apart last season while Ryan played 20 less games. And imagine if Ryan plays like his old self. 2017 he had a terrible season but in playoffs he produces 15 points in 19 games, showing he still has it. Even if he doesn't produce those numbers, I would rather have a struggling forward at that cap hit than a struggling defensemen. We have a ton of defense prospects and there will be no room for Seabrook in the lineup the way he's been playing. And for Saad, he is not as advertised and he will disappoint yet again this season in my opinion. Bringing back old pieces hasn't worked all these times Bowman has done it. I don't see it working with Saad. Getting rid of him frees up the cap space for Panarin. Who I think we all agree, we'd love to have back. Also, Dzingel is on the come up, he will be a great sign for whoever gets him if he hits free agency this upcoming offseason.


      I’d just like to point out that you said that bringing back the old guys haven’t worked out thus far, and them immediately proceede to bring back a former player in Panarin.

      Don’t get me wrong , I’d love to have Seabrook gone, but at the price of Saad I’ll pass.
      Sep. 27, 2018 at 1:05 p.m.
      #7
      Thread Starter
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2018
      Posts: 832
      Likes: 717
      Quoting: Stan_Bowman
      I’d just like to point out that you said that bringing back the old guys haven’t worked out thus far, and them immediately proceede to bring back a former player in Panarin.

      Don’t get me wrong , I’d love to have Seabrook gone, but at the price of Saad I’ll pass.


      Bringing back old guys hasn't worked, but bringing back a player of Panarin's caliber hasn't been done. Sharp, Ladd, Campbell, Oduya, those guys don't even compare to Panarin. Bringing back Panarin shouldn't even be a comparison to what has been brought back in the past. We are talking about landing the 2nd biggest free agent behind Karlsson. And if you think we could get more back with Saad involved, great, we get more back. I'd be fine with getting rid of Saad. He is not worth 6 mil. Signed that contract at the height of winning the cups. I also think your underestimating Ryan. He is not even close to worth his contract but he can easily replace Saad in our lineup.
      Sep. 27, 2018 at 1:41 p.m.
      #8
      Kyle from Chicago
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Feb. 2018
      Posts: 9,905
      Likes: 5,888
      Quoting: JonSnow88
      Bringing back old guys hasn't worked, but bringing back a player of Panarin's caliber hasn't been done. Sharp, Ladd, Campbell, Oduya, those guys don't even compare to Panarin. Bringing back Panarin shouldn't even be a comparison to what has been brought back in the past. We are talking about landing the 2nd biggest free agent behind Karlsson. And if you think we could get more back with Saad involved, great, we get more back. I'd be fine with getting rid of Saad. He is not worth 6 mil. Signed that contract at the height of winning the cups. I also think your underestimating Ryan. He is not even close to worth his contract but he can easily replace Saad in our lineup.


      I like Bobby Ryan, but I like Saad more. I also think that Ottawa rejects this because they would have to dish out more money to over paid players.
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll