Quoting: mhockey91
Doesn’t make sense for both teams. If sharks are contending now, they need Vlasic. Rangers are rebuilding and have no use for him and his contract
Sharks need to clear space to resign karlsson. Braun, Dillon, Melker karlsson are all clear candidates to move to do that. However, Dillon has emerged as a defensive (really two way) stud this year. Braun alone may not be expensive enough to clear the space alone and Melker doesnt clear that much either while adding significant unseen value. Vlasic has the big money and term, as well as alot of marektability particularly to poor defensive teams. Trading pickles clears ample space for EK 65 while bringing back a return that helps the sharks win now.
For the Rangers, I can see the downside of adding pickles if they don't intend to contend for 3-5 years. If that is true, then they are better off stockpiling 23 or younger players and prospects as well as picks.
I am not sure that is the direction the rangers want to go. Most likely, their top choice is to resign hayes and Kreider long term, trade Zucarello for picks/prospects, and make a run for it next year. However, if they want to compete, they have to improve defensively dramatically. I think this deal makes sense if they want to compete next year. They add Pickles to the D, Labanc and Karlsson to the O, and then begin to get a look at their 5 first round picks over the last couple years.
They also could use solid Vet leadership and off ice value that pickles adds. He was on team canada, not only for his D, but for his character, work ethic, and heart. A team like the rangers, with many young players and prospects, could use a veteran star to look up to and learn from. He brings a wealth of knowledge about how to play good D, how to be a professional, and simply how to win.