Nah Blues pass on that not worth it at all.

brah

Pietrangelo 10th in Norris
Schwartz when healthy a 60 Point scorer

you gave us an older guy who can't produce as much has a worse contract because Schwartz is on a steal of a contract.
Decent Prospect and the first is going to be late so doesn't add as much as you think it would.

I rest my case on why this wouldn't be worth it. Blues aren't here to give every team a favor. We aren't going to just give you players for only the guys you are willing to offer. You are nuts if you think that's fair.

I was wrong 9th in Norris.

The PHI bias is extreme.

How exactly does Voracek not produce as much as Schwartz? Voracek also has much better durability than Schwartz. Schwartz can't stay healthy.

Well I said that wrong I didn't proof read, he won't produce as much as long-term as Schwartz will. Schwartz is 26 if he can overcome injuries he could get up to 60 maybe even be a 70 point player, Voracek is on the downslide of his career in about 2-3 years. Schwartz has another 6-7 Years if they are on the downslide at the same age.

Already Armstrong said Schwartz is untouchable.

The value of the trade probably is off but your assessment that, "Schwartz when healthy a 60 Point scorer... you gave us an older guy who can't produce as much has a worse contract" is a bit off. Schwartz is NEVER healthy enough to play a full season and therefore has only reached 60 points once. Voracek is gonna easiky hit 60+ again this year so will only have missed that mark once in 7 seasons (factoring in that he was almost point per game pace in the lockout shortened year). He's also missed 9 games in that time... His contract is worse but at least he's a reliable, high point producer.