SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Could Tampa fit Panarin Trades with NYR - CAR - FLA - DAL

Created by: Zwui21
Team: 2019-20 Tampa Bay Lightning
Initial Creation Date: May 13, 2019
Published: May 13, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Wouldn't it be great if the Lightning could finally give Stamkos a good winger to play 5v5 hockey with? It definitely would, as this could be what makes Tampa takes the next step (IMO).
But could Tampa afford a top UFA this summer? The answer is "Ehhhh, probably not."
Even in a best case scenario where Point sign a bridge deal, Killorn and Tyler Johnson waive their clause and get traded + Callahan gone, the cap would be too little in projection to the 2020 offseason, where Vasi, Sergachev and Cirelli have to be re-signed. And the Dcore would also be too short come next season.

The only way I see Tampa being able to commit to another big contract is getting rid of all Killorn, Tyler Johnson and Palat + one of Gourde/Miller. And we are obviously never gonna see so much change during one single offseason (even if I personally think Killonr, Johnson and Palat are the weak links in the Lightning chain and would love to get rid of them).
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$7,000,000
3$875,000
3$900,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
7$10,500,000
1$1,400,000
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
TBL
    Future considerations
    NYR
    1. Callahan, Ryan
    2. 2020 2nd round pick (TBL)
    2.
    TBL
    1. 2019 7th round pick (FLA)
    2. 2020 5th round pick (FLA)
    3.
    TBL
    1. 2019 1st round pick (DAL)
    2. 2020 4th round pick (DAL)
    4.
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2019
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the DAL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the CHI
    Logo of the FLA
    2020
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the DAL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the FLA
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    2021
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the TBL
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    21$83,000,000$78,162,498$0$1,362,500$4,837,502
    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    $10,500,000$10,500,000
    LW
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $8,500,000$8,500,000
    LW, C
    NMC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $864,167$864,167
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $5,166,666$5,166,666
    C, LW, RW
    NTC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    C, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $9,500,000$9,500,000
    RW
    UFA - 8
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $5,300,000$5,300,000
    LW, RW
    NTC
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $728,333$728,333 (Performance Bonus$182,500$182K)
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $900,000$900,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $700,000$700,000
    LW
    UFA - 1
    $2,000,000$2,000,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $7,875,000$7,875,000
    LD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$850,000$850K)
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $6,750,000$6,750,000
    LD
    NTC
    UFA - 7
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $697,500$697,500 (Performance Bonus$147,500$148K)
    RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $1,150,000$1,150,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $1,400,000$1,400,000
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $1,300,000$1,300,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the Tampa Bay Lightning
    $875,000$875,000
    LD
    RFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    May 13, 2019 at 8:32 a.m.
    #1
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2017
    Posts: 389
    Likes: 69
    Ah yes, bring in the guy that pissed off the Lightning fanbase and Kucherov. Great idea.
    May 13, 2019 at 8:39 a.m.
    #2
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 3,249
    Likes: 620
    The Panthers are t going to help you get Panarin, as they are going to sign both him and Bobrovsky.
    May 13, 2019 at 8:40 a.m.
    #3
    Hurricane Tulsky
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2018
    Posts: 8,853
    Likes: 3,633
    I don’t see the need for the Canes to trade a developing stud offensive defenseman who’s young and RFA for many years to come for Miller’s contract.

    I like Miller, and think he’d fit in on the Canes, but the Canes could get equal production for much cheaper than Miller.
    May 13, 2019 at 8:44 a.m.
    #4
    Tspky
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Feb. 2016
    Posts: 3,885
    Likes: 980
    rangers won't help tampa get panarin when they are considered to be one of the favorites for him
    May 13, 2019 at 8:50 a.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 1,304
    Likes: 538
    Quoting: tampabaylightning1015
    Ah yes, bring in the guy that pissed off the Lightning fanbase and Kucherov. Great idea.


    Panarin and Kucherov are good friends, what do you even mean. Not because of an awkward handshake that they are now enemies lol
    May 13, 2019 at 9:07 a.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Apr. 2017
    Posts: 1,120
    Likes: 439
    1. Doesn't these moves suck the depth out of the team? They used to have 3 strong lines, now TBL would have 2 strong lines, and some maybes on the 3rd and 4th lines. As BOS is showing, you need at least 3 lines (if not all 4) to succeed.

    2. That doesn't fix the D (which I believe was the biggest issue this post season). It's still a 1.5 line d-core.

    3. Not that it matters much in this scenario, but I think Point is closer to 8.5 than 7.
    May 13, 2019 at 11:34 a.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: May 2019
    Posts: 1,304
    Likes: 538
    Quoting: TMarch
    1. Doesn't these moves suck the depth out of the team? They used to have 3 strong lines, now TBL would have 2 strong lines, and some maybes on the 3rd and 4th lines. As BOS is showing, you need at least 3 lines (if not all 4) to succeed.

    2. That doesn't fix the D (which I believe was the biggest issue this post season). It's still a 1.5 line d-core.

    3. Not that it matters much in this scenario, but I think Point is closer to 8.5 than 7.



    1. I agree with you, adding a big contract would definitely suck the depth out of the team.
    In my opinion Tampa this season had 4 strong lines, not three. But this was mainly due to some players on every single line standing out and elevating their linemates game. Players like Palat and Johnson are holding back the line they play on instead of helping it succeed.

    2. Absolutely. In fact this was just a mock to see if it would be possible for Tampa to get a top UFA this summer and what would be the outcome. In my opinion BriseBois should target a RHD with some term left on his contract (I'm in love with what Colin Miller could bring + his term and AAV) in order to have one very very solid top 4.

    3. Ehh, it depends. This is a bit coming from today's article of TheAthletic, where Lightning's beat writer Joe Smith discusses Brayden Point situation and future contract:
    In talking with Point and his agent Gerry Johannson during the season, a few key points came into play. Point’s main priority is staying (and winning) in Tampa Bay, which would require him making it work in Tampa Bay’s cap structure. They’re open-minded when it comes to contract length. That doesn’t mean Point won’t look for the best deal, but there will have to be compromise on both ends to make this work long-term.

    “It’s about winning, taxes, quality of life, and where you want to be,” Johannson said. “Players ultimately want to do what they want to do. I always say, ‘The best deal is not always the most money, the best deal is the best deal.”

    Time will tell
    TMarch liked this.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll