Quoting: ConnorsCousin
agree with the second part. and I guess my whole point is that when people say we're stuck with Lucic's contract, its a bit of an exaggeration. First of all, if you're not dressing him, he's not a problem on the ice. So the Oilers could dress 12 forwards ahead of Milan. Secondly, if push came to shove at the expansion draft, yes buying him out gives us no cap flexibility, but it does mean we get to protect someone else who has more value, so still worth it. And lastly, like I said, his actual money owed is less than his cap hit. Budget teams love to eat these kinds of contracts because it helps them reach the floor. Imagine eating 50% percent of that and we're practically paying his salary to play somewhere else. I'm saying the contract is easier to move than you make it seem to be.
I don't know if you meant to quote someone else or not, but I explicitly said that we're probably stuck with Looch for another year or two until the contract becomes more palatable. That doesn't imply that we're stuck with him until the contract runs out.
That does not, however, change the fact that the contract is still nearly buyout proof. If push comes to shove, and Lucic does not waive his NMC before the expansion draft, it becomes a last-minute resort. But, there will be no cap savings, and management will have to make a decision accordingly.
I hope that clarifies my position on this.