Quoting: vic997
Zucker is a lot better than Hornqvist. He's a defensively responsible winger like Mark Stone. I have no doubt Zucker would be a 60-70 pts winger on the Pens.
It's the back-end of hornqvist's contract that's brutal.
To compensate, I added the first.
Zucker is highly over rated. Zucker and Hornqvist produce nearly the same point production. Hornqvist has more value past point production that Zucker as well. Also, the only reason the Pens would consider trading Hornqvist is cap reasons, while the Wild have been actively trying to move Zucker for over a year, with no takers. Zucker is not a defensive liability, but he doesn't bring a level of D to the table either. hornqvist plays with much more passion and is a better leader.
Points only (and I know that points aren't everything), looking at the last 4 years:
Z has 313gp 89-87-176, 0.562 ppg
H has 285gp 90-91-181, 0.635 ppg
Only the last 2 years looks a little better for Zucker (as it includes his career year and Hornqvist's bad year)
Z has 163gp 54-52-106, 0.650 ppg
H has 133gp 47-39-86, 0.623 ppg
So despite Zucker's career year and 30 more games, they scored close to the same goals. Points per game is also quite close despite one having a career year and the other a "he stunk" year.
Their on ice value is extremely similar. Zucker is a higher cap hit so that does not help his value to the Pens (as I mentioned, Hornqvist probably only moves for cap reasons). There is simply no way that Zucker = Hornqvist + 1st. Not even Hornqvist + Bellerive. Bjorkqvist+cap difference+Hornqvist's passion more than offsets the age difference. Hornqvist + Bjorkqvist and we can talk. If the Wild want more then they are retaining too.