SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Keep Neal and dont get Lucic

Created by: peeps
Team: 2019-20 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Oct. 9, 2019
Published: Oct. 9, 2019
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Talbot to WPG just so you understand I never signed him. Went with the cheaper route with Neuvirth.
Free Agent Signings
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$700,000
Trades
1.
2.
CGY
  1. 2022 7th round pick (WPG)
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2021
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
2022
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the WPG
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
22$81,500,000$70,438,376$0$140,000$11,061,624
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,750,000$6,750,000
LW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$6,375,000$6,375,000
C, LW, RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,850,000$4,850,000
C, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$5,350,000$5,350,000
C
NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Edmonton Oilers
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,300,000$4,300,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,125,000$3,125,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$715,000$715,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,675,000$1,675,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,250,000$1,250,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LD
NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$4,650,400$4,650,400
LD/RD
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,375,000$1,375,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,237,500$1,237,500
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$3,857,143$3,857,143
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$755,833$755,833 (Performance Bonus$57,500$58K)
RD
UFA - 1
$700,000$700,000
G
UFA
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$730,833$730,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$700,000$700,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Oct. 9, 2019 at 12:34 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2018
Posts: 17,068
Likes: 12,075
At least Calgary will get a 3rd out of the Lucic trade. Because Neal is scoring 20 goals.
Oct. 9, 2019 at 12:35 a.m.
#2
CGY
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2015
Posts: 5,544
Likes: 2,066
The crazy thing is.... he didn’t fit with the Flames. He’s too similar to Monahan and that line would have been a defensive liability with 2 weak skaters. The Backlund line is a shutdown line, not what neal is known for. Factor that in and you end up exactly where he played... bottom 6, also had issues with Peters. It was a shortsighted signing by Treliving
CN10 liked this.
Oct. 9, 2019 at 12:37 a.m.
#3
GloryDaysAreBack
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 1,095
Likes: 469
You're just hurting yourself trying to go back in time and change things. At least you didn't trade anything to get Neal in the first place. He was just a UFA signing. So hey! Just think of it as a 5+million dollar checking forward for the next 4 years for FREE! YAAAAY!
Oct. 9, 2019 at 2:21 a.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 38,602
Likes: 19,715
Neal would not be scoring in CGY he had no synergy with anyone on the Flames top 6 roster and is not a viable bottom 6 player since he is defensively challenged. Lucic is not know for being a goal scorer and we don't need him to be, we were 2nd in the league last year for goals and Neal only had 7. Meanwhile Looch has come out every game so far and made an impact physically. The hindsight was never with the trade it was always with the signing in the first place.
CN10 liked this.
Oct. 9, 2019 at 11:16 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2019
Posts: 408
Likes: 176
Neal has looked great so far, but there was about a month of 0.5 PPG play out of Neal last year where we felt like he was turning it around. If he's still scoring by US Thanksgiving then we can look back on the deal as a disaster. I was worried about Neal bouncing back when the trade was announced, but as other posters have mentioned it wouldn't have happened here due to him being a poor fit in our top 6 and the player not having any drive whatsoever when he was playing on the third line. Lucic has brought some of the snarl the Flames were missing at least and the room seems to like him. When Neal's not scoring he looks like a beer leaguer floating around out there. Perhaps over the course of a long season the swap looks better from a Calgary perspective.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll