Seabrook is a huge no, guys getting healthy scratched on a weak D line in chicago why would we want him for 5 years. Plus trading those assets for hall he better have an extension in place. I'd rather change the prospect from newhook to someone else and not take back a third.

Big fat no on both trades, these are not upgrades. Newhook and a 1st? Are people taking crazy pills

Avs banking on a change of scenery for Seabrook will bring him back close when he was at top of his game
What you think of changing the trade to Hall for Burakovsky and Timmins since the Avs deep on D depth?

I highly doubt Sakic takes on anything that of that size that goes longer than MacKinnon's contract.

Dear lord no, stop it. There are just madness of ideas that make 0 sense long term. Timmins is a big piece of the Avs future, hes not rental trade bait for Hall.
And Seabrooks isnt going to rebound, have you watched him play? There is no rebound, hes toast

You must understand if you don’t give up one of your better prospects you aren’t getting a great player you give to get you want Quality for Quantity and it just doesn’t work that way in the NHL. You aren’t going to fleece a team because you think you are entitled to it. From here on I think I am nullifying any Opinion of yours just because you do not understand the NHL Market.

Avs don’t need hall, and they cant afford to be moving key cogs Of their blue line bc it’s not smart as an organizational plan for. Rental.

It’s simple but hey you think makar has to be traded to get hall so You do you. When the majority of posters on here, including devil fans agree the mark stone package is a fair return, go look at the tape of me saying a byram nieto and a 2nd would be the similar package, it might be you who is out of touch with the market bc you have a crush on hall and over value him

Also you live in this made up narrative world that this is about me thinking you can fleece for hall. No it’s moving valuable long term pieces that offset the mackinnon window and keep avs competitive longer, but want to police my logic and make up your own story you do you

The one we were arguing about early was a Fully Extended. I don’t think you understand the gravity that NJD has the upper ground not Colorado. If Colorado won’t supply the needs someone else is bound to. So you can keep your Byram not get a cup and not really have any other opportunity or window because you don’t have another option for a sniper.

NJD won’t give him as a rental you are going to have to pay full value of him. NJD is not willing to take spare parts for a rental because he has said he would re-sign.