SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Trading Burns and retooling

Created by: braisman
Team: 2020-21 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: May 9, 2020
Published: May 9, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
2$900,000
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,500,000
1$800,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$3,000,000
4$4,750,000
3$3,500,000
1$700,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Puljujärvi, Jesse [Reserve List]
EDM
  1. Dahlén, Jonathan [RFA Rights]
  2. 2020 5th round pick (SJS)
2.
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the TBL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the COL
Logo of the OTT
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the WSH
2021
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the WSH
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
2022
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the SJS
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$76,660,833$0$630,000$4,839,167
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LW, RW
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$8,000,000$8,000,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,500,000$3,500,000
RW, LW
UFA - 4
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, C, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,625,000$5,625,000
C
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$3,000,000$3,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
$700,000$700,000
LW, C
UFA - 1
$3,500,000$3,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
$900,000$900,000
RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$1,500,000$1,500,000
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$700,000$700,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$836,667$836,667 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$768,333$768,333 (Performance Bonus$65,000$65K)
LW, RW
RFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$7,000,000$7,000,000
LD/RD
NMC
UFA - 6
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$10,000,000$10,000,000
RD
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$5,750,000$5,750,000
G
M-NTC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
$4,500,000$4,500,000
LD/RD
UFA - 3
$4,750,000$4,750,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$925,000$925,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$2,250,000$2,250,000
LD/RD
UFA - 4
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$800,000$800,000
RD
UFA

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
May 9, 2020 at 10:43 p.m.
#1
Brace for the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,840
Likes: 6,647
Except you should get more. Add Laughton and 2 2nds
May 9, 2020 at 11:02 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,275
Likes: 2,896
Honestly, I'm not entirely sure about Vatanen and the goalie tandem, but this is actually very good management of the retooling. Probably should get more for Burns, but it's overall very sensible.
May 9, 2020 at 11:17 p.m.
#3
Bdinella
Avatar of the user
Joined: Dec. 2016
Posts: 654
Likes: 116
Edited May 9, 2020 at 11:23 p.m.
As a Flyers fan I am not sure they can do this. I think this would put them in cap hell especially if a flat cap. I don’t there is much add but if so very little because of the Burns contract

How about Ghost, prospect and a 2nd for Burns and retention?
May 10, 2020 at 1:24 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,322
Likes: 4,703
Quoting: Bdinella
As a Flyers fan I am not sure they can do this. I think this would put them in cap hell especially if a flat cap. I don’t there is much add but if so very little because of the Burns contract

How about Ghost, prospect and a 2nd for Burns and retention?


I think that’s fair add for 750k retention, we would need a first for 1.5m retention
May 10, 2020 at 1:27 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 11,322
Likes: 4,703
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
Honestly, I'm not entirely sure about Vatanen and the goalie tandem, but this is actually very good management of the retooling. Probably should get more for Burns, but it's overall very sensible.


I agree is rather pick up Dilion again and save a little money
But not a bad idea this team has a lot more depth and without a CBO we’re stuck with Jones for min 2-3 more seasons.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll