Quoting: mhockey91
How does “on pace” mean nothing. For example, last year Bryan rust played 72 games. Is it realistic to expect if he played 10 more games he would’ve scored TWO goals and 3 assists? Yes it’s completely realistic . I am not being bias at all. Being bias would be me saying this is Bryan rusts breakout year and he’s now an elite player. That’s bias. Saying Rust is capable of 50 points is not bias at all LOL
And its entirely realistic based on his career as a whole that he may have had no points in those last 10 games or 3 or who cares. The point is, we can see from his career up to this point, he is 28, he's most likely to get around 15-20 goals and 35-40 points. That is a very good 3rd liner. What he showed this year is, he isn't bad at all if he's being asked to player higher in the lineup. The problem with overvaluing that though is what happens if a younger player does better alongside Malkin or Crosby? Rust gets pushed down and his stats suffer. He isn't a game breaker by any stretch, without a world class linemate, he's around 15-20 goals and 40 points. That is all. That isn't a knock against him as a player, its just clearly what he is. You sound exactly like people who think Kapanen is definitely a top 6 winger who will score 30+ goals and 60 points. I think it could absolutely happen, once or twice in his career, but its not really what I think he's ever going to be.