SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Burns

Created by: SlevinKalevra
Team: 2020-21 Dallas Stars
Initial Creation Date: Jun. 5, 2020
Published: Jun. 10, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
My version of rawzucc’s sharks agm. Kept Faksa. Should probably be moved for a scoring forward to get Dickie out of the top six, but I like the balance of this lineup and didn’t want to give away more picks for a winger that may or may not fit. Hintz and Guri should take a step forward this year. Adding Burns and Harley to the back end is massive. I think that and a new coach could really help scoring while keeping a strong team defense. Expansion should clear cap for Miro
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$3,250,000
2$2,750,000
2$2,750,000
2$850,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$3,750,000
Trades
1.
DAL
  1. 2020 4th round pick (NJD)
2.
DAL
  1. Burns, Brent ($1,250,000 retained)
SJS
  1. Cogliano, Andrew
  2. 2021 1st round pick (DAL)
Additional Details:
Albin Eriksson
Buyouts
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the NJD
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the BUF
2021
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
2022
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
Logo of the DAL
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$80,553,699$3,047,866$3,120,000$946,301
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$1,500,000$1,500,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$9,850,000$9,850,000
C, RW
NMC
UFA - 7
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$2,750,000$2,750,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$9,500,000$9,500,000
LW, C
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$2,750,000$2,750,000
C
UFA - 3
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$6,250,000$6,250,000
RW
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,250,000$3,250,000
C, LW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$2,400,000$2,400,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$795,000$795,000 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
LW, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$7,000,000$7,000,000
RW
NMC
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$5,800,000$5,800,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$4,250,000$4,250,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$4,916,667$4,916,667
G
M-NTC, NMC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$2,500,000$2M)
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the San Jose Sharks
$4,030,000$4,030,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$894,167$894,167
LD
RFA - 4
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$2,350,000$2,350,000
RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$3,750,000$3,750,000
G
UFA - 3
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$750,000$750,000
C, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$850,000$850,000
C, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Dallas Stars
$737,500$737,500
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Jun. 10, 2020 at 3:03 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 8,634
Likes: 3,931
I don’t think San Jose would unless very desperate. Retaining that much term is a huge ask. Doing that and giving up burns I think is worth nearly double. In my opinion.
Jun. 10, 2020 at 4:01 p.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 576
Shark decline too much retain. Already take bad player cogliano. Send good prospect i consider.
Jun. 10, 2020 at 5:06 p.m.
#3
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,350
Likes: 2,945
I like it actually. I would probably suggest adding a B-tier forward prospect just because San Jose needs that a lot. Maybe you add that and drop the 4th? Then you have a deal.

Is Faksa really worth that much though?
Jun. 10, 2020 at 5:12 p.m.
#4
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 2,739
Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
I like it actually. I would probably suggest adding a B-tier forward prospect just because San Jose needs that a lot. Maybe you add that and drop the 4th? Then you have a deal.

Is Faksa really worth that much though?


I meant to add Albin, but couldn’t find him then got distracted at work and did 1.5 retention in stead of 1.25. Lol. Faksa isn’t worth a ton so I’d rather keep him if the right return isn’t there
Jun. 10, 2020 at 5:14 p.m.
#5
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 2,739
Quoting: Jexus
Shark decline too much retain. Already take bad player cogliano. Send good prospect i consider.


Retention was supposed to be 1.25 and Albin Ericsson was supposed to be added per rawzucc’s post
Jun. 10, 2020 at 5:16 p.m.
#6
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2020
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 576
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Retention was supposed to be 1.25 and Albin Ericsson was supposed to be added per rawzucc’s post


That to much to.
Jun. 10, 2020 at 5:19 p.m.
#7
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 2,739
Quoting: Timmah007
I don’t think San Jose would unless very desperate. Retaining that much term is a huge ask. Doing that and giving up burns I think is worth nearly double. In my opinion.


I do think the Sharks can do better than that. This was more of a discussion btw another poster and I. As I stated below retention was supposed to be 1.25 and a B level forward prospect was supposed to be added. I feel like several teams would top that offer, but good luck getting double
Jun. 10, 2020 at 5:34 p.m.
#8
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jan. 2020
Posts: 5,350
Likes: 2,945
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
I meant to add Albin, but couldn’t find him then got distracted at work and did 1.5 retention in stead of 1.25. Lol. Faksa isn’t worth a ton so I’d rather keep him if the right return isn’t there


All good lol.
Jun. 10, 2020 at 5:59 p.m.
#9
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 1,487
Devils accept that if it's a 2021 4th, don't have a 2nd or 3rd in 2020 so can't give up that 4th
Jun. 10, 2020 at 6:49 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 2,739
Quoting: zyyyp
Devils accept that if it's a 2021 4th, don't have a 2nd or 3rd in 2020 so can't give up that 4th


We don’t have a second or third either so I’d want a 2020 pick. Pretty sure y’all have two if that makes you feel any better. Lol. I think he’d be a nice fit. Would like to keep him but with Esa and Miro ahead of him and Harley coming I feel like that cap is better used elsewhere
Jun. 10, 2020 at 7:51 p.m.
#11
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 1,487
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
We don’t have a second or third either so I’d want a 2020 pick. Pretty sure y’all have two if that makes you feel any better. Lol. I think he’d be a nice fit. Would like to keep him but with Esa and Miro ahead of him and Harley coming I feel like that cap is better used elsewhere


yeah no can do on the 2020 picks man. that would leave us with one pick from like 20-130. this team just can't afford that especially in such a talented draft. we need to be acquiring 2nds, 3rds, 4ths not trading them away. I like Oleksiak though, would do a 2021 3rd. A year later but a higher pick
SlevinKalevra liked this.
Jun. 10, 2020 at 7:55 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2019
Posts: 5,321
Likes: 2,739
Quoting: zyyyp
yeah no can do on the 2020 picks man. that would leave us with one pick from like 20-130. this team just can't afford that especially in such a talented draft. we need to be acquiring 2nds, 3rds, 4ths not trading them away. I like Oleksiak though, would do a 2021 3rd. A year later but a higher pick


Sold lol
zyyyp liked this.
Jun. 10, 2020 at 7:58 p.m.
#13
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2020
Posts: 3,075
Likes: 1,487
Quoting: SlevinKalevra
Sold lol


pleasure doing business good sir
SlevinKalevra liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll