SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Tampa trade ideas

Created by: BurnEmUp
Team: 2020-21 Calgary Flames
Initial Creation Date: Jul. 30, 2020
Published: Jul. 30, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Dube and Kylington are just breaking into the league, they take the roster spots left behind by the departure of Cirelli and Cernak. Pelletier and the 1st added to compensate for the discrepancy in value.

2nd proposal is along the same lines but just for Cirelli

3rd one the Flames take Johnson too if he can be convinced to waive and get an opportunity in the Flames top 6. Lowered the pick compensation because taking on the TJ contract carries risk and is expensive.

I know in a perfect world Tampa would rather keep all their players, but the flat cap is going to take a bite out of their roster.

The Flames need another good two way top 6 C, and a top 4 right handed Dman, so those two RFA's would really be a fit in Calgary.
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$2,250,000
1$787,500
3$3,000,000
5$5,000,000
Trades
1.
CGY
  1. Cernak, Erik [RFA Rights]
  2. Cirelli, Anthony [RFA Rights]
TBL
  1. Dubé, Dillon
  2. Kylington, Oliver [RFA Rights]
  3. Pelletier, Jakob
  4. 2020 1st round pick (CGY)
2.
CGY
    1. Anthony Cirelli
    TBL
      1. Dillon Dube
      2. 2020 1st round pick
      3.
      CGY
        1. Anthony Cirelli
        2. Erik Cernak
        3. Tyler Johnson

        If Johnson is willing to waive
        TBL
          1. Dillon Dube
          2. Jakob Pelletier
          3. Oliver Kylington
          4. 2020 2nd round pick (CGY)

          I lowered the 1st to a 2nd here because Johnson was added
          Buyouts
          DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
          2020
          Logo of the CGY
          Logo of the SJS
          Logo of the CGY
          Logo of the CGY
          Logo of the CGY
          2021
          Logo of the CGY
          Logo of the CGY
          Logo of the CGY
          Logo of the CGY
          Logo of the CGY
          Logo of the CGY
          2022
          Logo of the CGY
          Logo of the CGY
          Logo of the CGY
          Logo of the CGY
          Logo of the CGY
          Logo of the CGY
          Logo of the CGY
          ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
          19$81,500,000$68,044,166$0$850,000$13,455,834
          Left WingCentreRight Wing
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $6,750,000$6,750,000
          LW
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $6,375,000$6,375,000
          C, LW, RW
          M-NTC
          UFA - 3
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $4,850,000$4,850,000
          C, RW
          UFA - 4
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $2,250,000$2,250,000
          RW, LW
          UFA - 2
          $5,000,000$5,000,000
          C, LW
          UFA - 3
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $7,000,000$7,000,000
          RW
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $2,550,000$2,550,000
          C
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $5,350,000$5,350,000
          C
          NTC
          UFA - 4
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $733,333$733,333
          RW, C
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $5,250,000$5,250,000
          LW, RW
          NMC
          UFA - 3
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $3,125,000$3,125,000
          C, RW
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $787,500$787,500
          C, RW
          UFA - 1
          Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $3,375,000$3,375,000
          LD
          M-NTC
          UFA - 2
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $4,550,000$4,550,000
          RD
          UFA - 6
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $1,375,000$1,375,000
          G
          UFA - 1
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $1,237,500$1,237,500
          LD
          UFA - 4
          $3,000,000$3,000,000
          RD
          UFA - 3
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $894,166$894,166 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
          LD
          RFA - 1
          Logo of the Calgary Flames
          $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$425,000$425K)
          LD
          UFA - 1

          Embed Code

          • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
          • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

          Text-Embed

          Click to Highlight
          Jul. 30, 2020 at 6:23 p.m.
          #1
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jun. 2019
          Posts: 38,942
          Likes: 19,965
          Interesting, as a fan of both teams I'm conflicted. Also Johnson doesn't have negative value.
          Jul. 30, 2020 at 6:50 p.m.
          #2
          Log off the internet
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Mar. 2017
          Posts: 7,838
          Likes: 3,867
          How does Tyler Johnson turn a 1st into a 2nd?
          stammerman and JTBF81 liked this.
          Jul. 30, 2020 at 7:11 p.m.
          #3
          Thread Starter
          Yeah Baby
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2015
          Posts: 1,370
          Likes: 322
          Quoting: Ledge_And_Dairy
          Interesting, as a fan of both teams I'm conflicted. Also Johnson doesn't have negative value.


          Quoting: Hedman77
          How does Tyler Johnson turn a 1st into a 2nd?


          OK, so if the proposal is somewhat palatable without Johnson, what is Johnson's worth that needs to be added?

          I agree he doesn't have negative value, I think he'd do well in a top 6 role again, but I don't think his value will be all that high.
          Jul. 30, 2020 at 7:27 p.m.
          #4
          Log off the internet
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Mar. 2017
          Posts: 7,838
          Likes: 3,867
          Quoting: BurnEmUp
          OK, so if the proposal is somewhat palatable without Johnson, what is Johnson's worth that needs to be added?

          I agree he doesn't have negative value, I think he'd do well in a top 6 role again, but I don't think his value will be all that high.


          I think he could get a 2nd by himself.
          So the first trade, plus Johnson for a 2nd
          BurnEmUp and stammerman liked this.
          Jul. 30, 2020 at 7:30 p.m.
          #5
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Jun. 2019
          Posts: 38,942
          Likes: 19,965
          Quoting: Hedman77
          How does Tyler Johnson turn a 1st into a 2nd?


          What is your view on the original offer? Dube was very good in training camp as well as the exhibition game and looks like he has the tools for a top 6 winger role. I personally think its a pretty solid offer for both sides.
          BurnEmUp liked this.
          Jul. 30, 2020 at 7:31 p.m.
          #6
          Thread Starter
          Yeah Baby
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2015
          Posts: 1,370
          Likes: 322
          Quoting: Hedman77
          I think he could get a 2nd by himself.
          So the first trade, plus Johnson for a 2nd


          Kind of cleans the Flames out of draft picks for 2020, it'd be better if they could make it a 2021 2nd. But those are all pieces the Flames could use obviously, and the two main pieces are young so a loss of picks is worth for a team trying to win now.
          Jul. 30, 2020 at 8:09 p.m.
          #7
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Dec. 2019
          Posts: 2,586
          Likes: 1,142
          3rd trade is a definite no from TBL as others have said Johnson doesn’t have negative value.

          1st trade is also a definite no but maybe something to build on.

          The 2nd is closest in value, and probably a lot depends on where the pick is. My gut tells me TBL still say no but again maybe something to build on.
          BurnEmUp and Hedman77 liked this.
          Jul. 30, 2020 at 8:46 p.m.
          #8
          Thread Starter
          Yeah Baby
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2015
          Posts: 1,370
          Likes: 322
          Quoting: Xqb15
          3rd trade is a definite no from TBL as others have said Johnson doesn’t have negative value.

          1st trade is also a definite no but maybe something to build on.

          The 2nd is closest in value, and probably a lot depends on where the pick is. My gut tells me TBL still say no but again maybe something to build on.


          That's alright by me, the biggest piece I want is Cirelli anyways.
          Xqb15 liked this.
          Jul. 30, 2020 at 9:28 p.m.
          #9
          Log off the internet
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Mar. 2017
          Posts: 7,838
          Likes: 3,867
          Quoting: Xqb15
          3rd trade is a definite no from TBL as others have said Johnson doesn’t have negative value.

          1st trade is also a definite no but maybe something to build on.

          The 2nd is closest in value, and probably a lot depends on where the pick is. My gut tells me TBL still say no but again maybe something to build on.


          Agreed on everything.
          I think the Lightning would want a player more proven than Dube, and I'm not sure Calgary is willing to give up (or we can afford) a player like that.
          Xqb15 and BurnEmUp liked this.
          Jul. 31, 2020 at 9:48 a.m.
          #10
          look good play good
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: Apr. 2019
          Posts: 426
          Likes: 98
          Dont want to give up Dube this early.
          He's progressing so well, he'll be a top 6 stable forward here for years to come.
          Jul. 31, 2020 at 10:22 a.m.
          #11
          Thread Starter
          Yeah Baby
          Avatar of the user
          Joined: May 2015
          Posts: 1,370
          Likes: 322
          Quoting: royle9
          Dont want to give up Dube this early.
          He's progressing so well, he'll be a top 6 stable forward here for years to come.


          True, but so will Cirelli who's just turned 23 this month.
           
          Reply
          To create a post please Login or Register
          Question:
          Options:
          Add Option
          Submit Poll