SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Panarin to Montreal

Created by: NickC1988
Team: 2017-18 Chicago Blackhawks
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 4, 2016
Published: Sep. 4, 2016
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$2,750,000
1$1,250,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
DeBrincat, Alex
3$925,000
1$3,000,000
1$2,000,000
Trades
1.
2.
CHI
    Ryan Spooner
    BOS
      Ville Pokka
      Erik Gustafsson
      3.
      CHI
        Expansion
        DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
        2018
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        2019
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        2020
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        Logo of the CHI
        ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
        22$75,000,000$68,441,461$3,558,000$890,000$6,558,539
        Left WingCentreRight Wing
        $2,750,000$2,750,000
        C, LW
        UFA - 1
        $10,500,000$10,500,000
        C
        NMC
        UFA - 6
        $2,625,000$2,625,000
        RW
        NMC
        UFA - 6
        $839,166$839,166
        LW, RW
        UFA - 2
        $4,550,000$4,550,000
        C, LW
        NMC
        UFA - 4
        $5,275,000$5,275,000
        RW
        NMC
        UFA - 4
        $3,000,000$3,000,000
        LW, C
        UFA - 3
        $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$650,000$650K)
        RW, C
        UFA - 2
        DeBrincat, Alex
        $925,000$925,000
        $925,000$925,000
        LW, RW
        UFA - 2
        $2,775,000$2,775,000
        C
        M-NTC
        UFA - 2
        $863,333$863,333
        C, RW
        UFA - 1
        $717,500$717,500 (Performance Bonus$107,500$108K)
        RW, LW
        UFA - 1
        Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
        $5,538,462$5,538,462
        LD
        NMC
        UFA - 6
        $6,875,000$6,875,000
        RD
        NMC
        UFA - 7
        $6,000,000$6,000,000
        G
        M-NTC, NMC
        UFA - 3
        $4,100,000$4,100,000
        LD/RD
        M-NTC, NMC
        UFA - 2
        $714,167$714,167 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
        G
        UFA - 1
        $1,250,000$1,250,000
        LD
        UFA - 1
        $2,000,000$2,000,000
        RD
        UFA
        $872,500$872,500
        LD
        UFA - 2
        $863,333$863,333
        RD
        UFA - 3

        Embed Code

        • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
        • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

        Text-Embed

        Click to Highlight
        Sep. 4, 2016 at 4:41 p.m.
        #1
        exo2769
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jul. 2015
        Posts: 15,835
        Likes: 10,044
        Pretty good team on the ice. Wonder what F50marco thinks. He's a huge Habs fan on here. What did you do with Darling? Some people think that they're the best goalie duo in the NHL right now. You could get something for him. I'm assuming that 100% of the $1.9M is for bonuses that will be applied for next year?
        Sep. 4, 2016 at 7:05 p.m.
        #2
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2015
        Posts: 115
        Likes: 5
        I'm usually one to tear down people's rosters, but I really, really like this one. I especially like the Spooner deal and I think both trades are a lot better and a lot more creative than most of the stuff that gets posted here.

        My biggest concern with the roster is that Ryan Spooner is going to get way more that $2,750,000 on his next contract. It would be really tough cap-wise, but I think it could be done using the framework of your moves. If Gustavsson was replaced in the Spooner trade by a prospect or pick, you could go without signing Wideman, saving at least $1M. You could also try leaving Kruger unprotected in expansion -- Las Vegas will have too many Defenseman to have need for TVR or Gustavsson, and trading Pokka would give the Blackhawks the room to protect McNeil and Hartman, making Kruger possibly the most appealing option for the expansion team, even with his Cap hit -- which could save $3M. Kruger would be tough to part with, but a passable replacement could be found on the cheap.

        Also, could you imagine an all Rusophone line in Montreal of Panarin-Galchenyuk-Radulov? Fuck, that would be so sick.
        Sep. 4, 2016 at 9:32 p.m.
        #3
        Alternate universe
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Aug. 2016
        Posts: 27
        Likes: 0
        As a Habs fan I accept the trade. Lol
        Sep. 5, 2016 at 2:58 a.m.
        #4
        Thread Starter
        Chicago
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jun. 2015
        Posts: 7,002
        Likes: 2,852
        Quoting: JacobWallman
        I'm usually one to tear down people's rosters, but I really, really like this one. I especially like the Spooner deal and I think both trades are a lot better and a lot more creative than most of the stuff that gets posted here.

        My biggest concern with the roster is that Ryan Spooner is going to get way more that $2,750,000 on his next contract. It would be really tough cap-wise, but I think it could be done using the framework of your moves. If Gustavsson was replaced in the Spooner trade by a prospect or pick, you could go without signing Wideman, saving at least $1M. You could also try leaving Kruger unprotected in expansion -- Las Vegas will have too many Defenseman to have need for TVR or Gustavsson, and trading Pokka would give the Blackhawks the room to protect McNeil and Hartman, making Kruger possibly the most appealing option for the expansion team, even with his Cap hit -- which could save $3M. Kruger would be tough to part with, but a passable replacement could be found on the cheap.

        Also, could you imagine an all Rusophone line in Montreal of Panarin-Galchenyuk-Radulov? Fuck, that would be so sick.

        Yeah Spooner's salary is really hard to pin point considering he might regress this coming season. I think Panarin in Montreal makes so much sense. He needs a Russian teammate that knows his cultural background. Trading him is so much more than just his skill, I don't think he's as productive if he is without Russian teammates. I also agree with Kruger being unprotected I just find it hard to believe Stan would do that he obviously loves Kruger.
        Sep. 5, 2016 at 2:58 a.m.
        #5
        Thread Starter
        Chicago
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jun. 2015
        Posts: 7,002
        Likes: 2,852
        Quoting: Tatsiq
        As a Habs fan I accept the trade. Lol

        Deal. Price ain't going to be in his prime forever you know? Gotta try to win now.
        Sep. 5, 2016 at 2:59 a.m.
        #6
        Thread Starter
        Chicago
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: Jun. 2015
        Posts: 7,002
        Likes: 2,852
        Quoting: exo2769
        Pretty good team on the ice. Wonder what F50marco thinks. He's a huge Habs fan on here. What did you do with Darling? Some people think that they're the best goalie duo in the NHL right now. You could get something for him. I'm assuming that 100% of the $1.9M is for bonuses that will be applied for next year?

        That or a rental.
        Sep. 5, 2016 at 6:24 p.m.
        #7
        Avatar of the user
        Joined: May 2015
        Posts: 19,621
        Likes: 6,760
        Quoting: exo2769
        Pretty good team on the ice. Wonder what F50marco thinks. He's a huge Habs fan on here. What did you do with Darling? Some people think that they're the best goalie duo in the NHL right now. You could get something for him. I'm assuming that 100% of the $1.9M is for bonuses that will be applied for next year?


        This could work exo. Those are three prospects that aren't flashy but could be stars in the league in the future with the right development. Lehkonen is a sleeper which many here in Mtl are dying to see. I'm a little skeptical that he will be a top 6 guy in his first year as some people think but he's skilled and reminds me a little of Teravainen. Juulsen is hard to read at this point but from what I've seen, he could be a poor mans Seabrook which isn't bad. Mostly top 4 material. Funny enough his manorisms and technique remind me more of Bieksa for some reason. Fucale is the absolute question mark. Kid could be a starter in the NHL or never make it at all. I really don't know. Goalies are really hard to project. At his age and skill he should be a starter in the AHL by now and it seems like there's a high chance he's starting in the ECHL. Some notable goalies have done the same and become star players but it's generally rare. This season will be a big season for all the three players. If each on steps up a notch, then your getting a solid package. If not, well we're stealing an amazing player away for what could be nothing.

        Being as unbiased as possible, you could get a better deal somewhere else I think. With that said, I think Montreal could offer something better as well.
         
        Reply
        To create a post please Login or Register
        Question:
        Options:
        Add Option
        Submit Poll