SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Jones Buyout Burns not moved

Created by: Klara
Team: 2020-21 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 14, 2020
Published: Aug. 15, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
4$3,500,000
3$2,500,000
1$900,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
1$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
3$3,400,000
1$800,000
1$900,000
1$700,000
2$1,500,000
4$3,000,000
2$1,800,000
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. McCann, Jared [RFA Rights]
PIT
  1. 2021 3rd round pick (SJS)
  2. 2021 5th round pick (SJS)
Additional Details:
not sure what PIT is valuing McCann at, would be willing to pay more.
2.
SJS
    Anywhere
    Buyouts
    DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
    2020
    Logo of the TBL
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the COL
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the OTT
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the WSH
    2021
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the PIT
    Logo of the WSH
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    2022
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    Logo of the SJS
    ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
    23$81,500,000$73,849,999$0$597,500$7,650,001

    Roster

    Left WingCentreRight Wing
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $5,625,000$5,625,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $3,500,000$3,500,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    LW, RW
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $8,000,000$8,000,000
    C
    M-NTC
    UFA - 7
    $3,000,000$3,000,000
    RW
    UFA - 3
    $1,500,000$1,500,000
    RW, LW
    UFA - 1
    $2,500,000$2,500,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $700,000$700,000
    C
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $768,333$768,333 (Performance Bonus$65,000$65K)
    LW, RW
    RFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $800,000$800,000
    C, LW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $900,000$900,000
    LW, RW
    UFA - 1
    Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
    LD
    UFA - 2
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $10,000,000$10,000,000
    RD
    NMC
    UFA - 7
    $3,400,000$3,400,000
    G
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $2,250,000$2,250,000
    LD/RD
    UFA - 4
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $5,280,000$5,280,000
    RD
    M-NTC
    UFA - 5
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $7,000,000$7,000,000
    LD/RD
    NMC
    UFA - 6
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$300,000$300K)
    RD
    UFA - 3
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $1,800,000$1,800,000
    G
    UFA - 1
    ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $763,333$763,333 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
    C, RW
    UFA - 1
    Logo of the San Jose Sharks
    $700,000$700,000
    RD
    UFA - 1
    $700,000$700,000
    LW, C
    UFA - 1

    Embed Code

    • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
    • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

    Text-Embed

    Click to Highlight
    Aug. 15, 2020 at 2:15 p.m.
    #1
    Am Yisrael Chai
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2018
    Posts: 18,791
    Likes: 6,833
    Think you did good here. McCann would cost more imo. Probably Gambrell and a 2nd could entice Pittsburgh to move him since they are loaded with bottom 6 depth.

    I recommend keeping Sorenson over Vesey too. He's dead weight.
    Klara liked this.
    Aug. 15, 2020 at 2:18 p.m.
    #2
    Thread Starter
    Bad Take Bot v1.02
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2019
    Posts: 2,703
    Likes: 1,891
    Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
    Think you did good here. McCann would cost more imo. Probably Gambrell and a 2nd could entice Pittsburgh to move him since they are loaded with bottom 6 depth.

    I recommend keeping Sorenson over Vesey too. He's dead weight.


    I would do McCann for the COL 2nd, would need to consider also adding Gambrell.

    Eh, Sorenson is questionable to even make the team, Vesey is a risk, could end up being dead weight, or maybe a good 3rd line scorer.
    Aug. 15, 2020 at 2:20 p.m.
    #3
    Am Yisrael Chai
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Oct. 2018
    Posts: 18,791
    Likes: 6,833
    Quoting: Klara
    I would do McCann for the COL 2nd, would need to consider also adding Gambrell.

    Eh, Sorenson is questionable to even make the team, Vesey is a risk, could end up being dead weight, or maybe a good 3rd line scorer.


    I remember Sorenson being formidable? well at least a year or two ago. But other than that fixing the G is the key which Talbot should do.
    Aug. 15, 2020 at 2:23 p.m.
    #4
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2020
    Posts: 5,302
    Likes: 2,912
    Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
    I remember Sorenson being formidable? well at least a year or two ago. But other than that fixing the G is the key which Talbot should do.


    He’s still good. He sucked for the first 50 games of the season, then began playing a bit better.
    Aug. 15, 2020 at 2:24 p.m.
    #5
    Thread Starter
    Bad Take Bot v1.02
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2019
    Posts: 2,703
    Likes: 1,891
    Quoting: Stanley_Cup_To_Manhattan
    I remember Sorenson being formidable? well at least a year or two ago. But other than that fixing the G is the key which Talbot should do.


    Sorenson had a really good playoffs in 17-18, and followed up with good production in 18-19, but since then has looked horrid.
    Aug. 15, 2020 at 2:27 p.m.
    #6
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2020
    Posts: 5,302
    Likes: 2,912
    Yeah McCann is guess would cost slightly more. I think the COL 2nd replacing that 3rd would do it. I also think he might be getting more $ but I wouldn’t know what he’s worth exactly. And even though he’s a great 3C option and it helps our depth, I can’t help but want to give him 2nd line minutes. Seems like he’d be better utilized at 2C or 2LW, but that’s just me.
    Klara liked this.
    Aug. 15, 2020 at 2:28 p.m.
    #7
    Thread Starter
    Bad Take Bot v1.02
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Aug. 2019
    Posts: 2,703
    Likes: 1,891
    Quoting: RawZuccSauce420
    Yeah McCann is guess would cost slightly more. I think the COL 2nd replacing that 3rd would do it. I also think he might be getting more $ but I wouldn’t know what he’s worth exactly. And even though he’s a great 3C option and it helps our depth, I can’t help but want to give him 2nd line minutes. Seems like he’d be better utilized at 2C or 2LW, but that’s just me.


    I'd rather have a quality 3C and a meh 2W than a bad 3C and a good 2W.
    FunMustBeAlways liked this.
    Aug. 15, 2020 at 2:35 p.m.
    #8
    Avatar of the user
    Joined: Jan. 2020
    Posts: 5,302
    Likes: 2,912
    Quoting: Klara
    I'd rather have a quality 3C and a meh 2W than a bad 3C and a good 2W.


    Fair enough.
     
    Reply
    To create a post please Login or Register
    Question:
    Options:
    Add Option
    Submit Poll