SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Rangers

Created by: TheCoontniac
Team: 2019-20 Carolina Hurricanes
Initial Creation Date: Aug. 26, 2020
Published: Aug. 26, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
Yeah Rangers fans will probably hate that trade, but we just had a weird trade yesterday so settle.

Enough cap space left to give Fleury and Foegele new contracts
Free Agent Signings
RESERVE LISTYEARSCAP HIT
3$925,000
Trades
1.
NYR
  1. Honka, Anttoni [Reserve List]
  2. 2020 1st round pick (TOR)
2.
OTT
  1. Gardiner, Jake
  2. Mrázek, Petr
  3. 2021 3rd round pick (CAR)
Buyouts
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the NYR
Logo of the BUF
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the TOR
2021
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the STL
2022
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the CAR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
21$81,500,000$76,986,499$0$3,360,000$4,513,501
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$2,650,000$3M)
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$8,454,000$8,454,000
C
UFA - 5
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,400,000$5,400,000
LW, RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$746,667$746,667 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
LW, RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,750,000$4,750,000
C, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$863,333$863,333 (Performance Bonus$537,500$538K)
RW
RFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LW, RW
UFA - 3
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$6,000,000$6,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,100,000$2,100,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,375,000$3,375,000
LW, RW, C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$763,333$763,333 (Performance Bonus$20,000$20K)
C, RW
RFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,300,000$5,300,000
LD
UFA - 6
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,750,000$5,750,000
RD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,400,000$3,400,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$5,250,000$5,250,000
LD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$4,025,000$4,025,000
RD
UFA - 5
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$850,000$850,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
$925,000$925,000
RD
RFA
Logo of the New York Rangers
$792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
G
UFA - 1
ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
Logo of the Ottawa Senators
$800,000$800,000
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$3,100,000$3,100,000
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$700,000$700,000 (Performance Bonus$1,300,000$1M)
RW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,437,500$2,437,500
LD/RD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Carolina Hurricanes
$2,300,000$2,300,000
RD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Aug. 26, 2020 at 8:08 a.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2018
Posts: 2,260
Likes: 672
I don't think the Rangers would be willing to move Lundkvist. Having him come in on a new ELC will be crucial for them in 21-22 onwards when there will be a lot of players in need of new contacts
TheCoontniac and ZM_NYR liked this.
Aug. 26, 2020 at 8:11 a.m.
#2
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 129
Likes: 30
Rangers fans generally agree that Nils is pretty much untouchable right now; that changes if DeAngelo is signed long term, but for now, Nils is basically our successor for that spot in the lineup, and having his ELC will be really helpful for the Rangers. I don't know that much about Honka as a prospect but just based on his age I would assume he's probably 2ish years away from the NHL in a best case scenario, and that doesn't really fit the Rangers' timeline. They're not really doing the whole "full rebuild, sell everything" thing anymore. Yeah we traded you Skjei for a 1st, but that was largely motivated by the fact Skjei had a NTC of some kind kicking in and we wanted to get rid of him before it did, similarly to Stepan back in 2017. I think the Rangers would be a bit more interested in some things that are a little more current, that are maybe a year if that from graduating to the NHL. I don't think they'd want to trade their futures for more futures, I think if they're going to sell futures, they'd rather be turning them into something different, probably current assets.

It's not a horrible idea, I think Georgiev to Carolina makes a lot of sense and I think Nils is a good prospect for you to think about if you're not really a fan of Joey Keane, but I'm not sure the return would be something that intrigues the Rangers.
TheCoontniac and SuprDave45 liked this.
Aug. 26, 2020 at 8:19 a.m.
#3
Thread Starter
Canes Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 1,250
Quoting: doabarrowroll
Rangers fans generally agree that Nils is pretty much untouchable right now; that changes if DeAngelo is signed long term, but for now, Nils is basically our successor for that spot in the lineup, and having his ELC will be really helpful for the Rangers. I don't know that much about Honka as a prospect but just based on his age I would assume he's probably 2ish years away from the NHL in a best case scenario, and that doesn't really fit the Rangers' timeline. They're not really doing the whole "full rebuild, sell everything" thing anymore. Yeah we traded you Skjei for a 1st, but that was largely motivated by the fact Skjei had a NTC of some kind kicking in and we wanted to get rid of him before it did, similarly to Stepan back in 2017. I think the Rangers would be a bit more interested in some things that are a little more current, that are maybe a year if that from graduating to the NHL. I don't think they'd want to trade their futures for more futures, I think if they're going to sell futures, they'd rather be turning them into something different, probably current assets.

It's not a horrible idea, I think Georgiev to Carolina makes a lot of sense and I think Nils is a good prospect for you to think about if you're not really a fan of Joey Keane, but I'm not sure the return would be something that intrigues the Rangers.


Yeah I feel you are pretty spot on with this.

Hypothetically if this trade actually went through, Rangers would use the 2 of their 3 1sts to move up into the top 10. a 1st overall and a 10th overall would be sick in this draft!

That being said youre probably right with Nils being untouchable.
Aug. 26, 2020 at 8:31 a.m.
#4
Brace for the Storm
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 12,840
Likes: 6,647
OOOF that's a NO

Honka is a very nice prospect to have but I wouldn't move a guy who has put up Dahlin/EK like numbers in SWE along with a proven NHL level goalie for such a package
Aug. 26, 2020 at 10:33 a.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 523
Likes: 99
Quoting: doabarrowroll
Rangers fans generally agree that Nils is pretty much untouchable right now; that changes if DeAngelo is signed long term, but for now, Nils is basically our successor for that spot in the lineup, and having his ELC will be really helpful for the Rangers. I don't know that much about Honka as a prospect but just based on his age I would assume he's probably 2ish years away from the NHL in a best case scenario, and that doesn't really fit the Rangers' timeline. They're not really doing the whole "full rebuild, sell everything" thing anymore. Yeah we traded you Skjei for a 1st, but that was largely motivated by the fact Skjei had a NTC of some kind kicking in and we wanted to get rid of him before it did, similarly to Stepan back in 2017. I think the Rangers would be a bit more interested in some things that are a little more current, that are maybe a year if that from graduating to the NHL. I don't think they'd want to trade their futures for more futures, I think if they're going to sell futures, they'd rather be turning them into something different, probably current assets.

It's not a horrible idea, I think Georgiev to Carolina makes a lot of sense and I think Nils is a good prospect for you to think about if you're not really a fan of Joey Keane, but I'm not sure the return would be something that intrigues the Rangers.


^ This..

Can't really put it any better.

If anything, DeAngelo is a more realistic target, he's gotta move for Nils anyway...that we can discuss. Just not for Honka, don't have any real need for a smallish RD with mediocre upside. How about a better C prospect, got any of those?

DeAngelo
Georgiev

for

Ryan Suzuki
Toronto's 1st

With Aho, Trocheck, Staal and Necas all on the current roster, you have less need at C than say the Rangers...who have no need at RD.
In return, you get a 60+ point 25 year old RD entering his prime and under RFA control for the next 3 seasons, and Georgiev.
Aug. 26, 2020 at 11:30 a.m.
#6
Thread Starter
Canes Baby
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2018
Posts: 4,499
Likes: 1,250
Quoting: SuprDave45
^ This..

Can't really put it any better.

If anything, DeAngelo is a more realistic target, he's gotta move for Nils anyway...that we can discuss. Just not for Honka, don't have any real need for a smallish RD with mediocre upside. How about a better C prospect, got any of those?

DeAngelo
Georgiev

for

Ryan Suzuki
Toronto's 1st

With Aho, Trocheck, Staal and Necas all on the current roster, you have less need at C than say the Rangers...who have no need at RD.
In return, you get a 60+ point 25 year old RD entering his prime and under RFA control for the next 3 seasons, and Georgiev.


Reason why Deangelo wouldnt work is because we cant afford. DeAngelo would be paid 5+ mil to play on the 3rd pairing. Also we would then have to leave him unprotected in the expansion draft.

With Nils in the trade (although not realistic) it allows us to have him in the lineup on a Entry contract!
SuprDave45 liked this.
Aug. 26, 2020 at 12:30 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jul. 2017
Posts: 523
Likes: 99
Quoting: jslongo
Reason why Deangelo wouldnt work is because we cant afford. DeAngelo would be paid 5+ mil to play on the 3rd pairing. Also we would then have to leave him unprotected in the expansion draft.

With Nils in the trade (although not realistic) it allows us to have him in the lineup on a Entry contract!


Gotcha, makes total sense.
TheCoontniac liked this.
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll