SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Maple Leafs 2020-2021

Created by: LeafsNation2479
Team: 2020-21 Toronto Maple Leafs
Initial Creation Date: Sep. 16, 2020
Published: Sep. 16, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Free Agent Signings
RFAYEARSCAP HIT
2$2,000,000
1$750,000
UFAYEARSCAP HIT
1$750,000
Trades
1.
2.
TOR
  1. Bennett, Sam
  2. Rittich, David
  3. 2020 5th round pick (CGY)
  4. 2021 3rd round pick (CGY)
Retained Salary Transactions
DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
2020
Logo of the PIT
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the VGK
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CAR
Logo of the COL
Logo of the SJS
Logo of the STL
Logo of the WPG
2021
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the CGY
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
2022
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
Logo of the TOR
ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
23$81,500,000$78,871,450$0$0$2,628,550
Left WingCentreRight Wing
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,250,000$2,250,000
RW, LW
M-NTC
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,640,250$11,640,250
C
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$6,962,366$6,962,366
RW
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW, LW
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$11,000,000$11,000,000
C, LW
NMC
UFA - 5
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$10,903,000$10,903,000
RW
UFA - 5
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$2,550,000$2,550,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
LW, RW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$821,667$821,667
LW, RW
RFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$725,000$725,000
C
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
RW
RFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,250,000$1,250,000
RW, LW
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
C, RW
UFA - 1
Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,000,000$5,000,000
LD
M-NTC
UFA - 2
Logo of the Minnesota Wild
$6,000,000$6,000,000
RD
UFA - 3
Logo of the Calgary Flames
$1,375,000$1,375,000
G
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$5,625,000$5,625,000
LD
NMC
UFA - 4
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$2,000,000$2,000,000
RD
M-NTC
UFA - 3
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$1,650,000$1,650,000
G
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$894,167$894,167
LD
UFA - 2
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$925,000$925,000
LD
UFA - 1
Logo of the Toronto Maple Leafs
$750,000$750,000
LD
UFA - 1

Embed Code

  • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
  • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

Text-Embed

Click to Highlight
Sep. 16, 2020 at 10:35 p.m.
#1
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 107
Likes: 18
Flames wouldn't trade Bennett for Kerfoot + Andersen, let alone adding Rittich and picks. Leafs fans - it's not happening. Please... stahp!!!!
Sep. 16, 2020 at 10:44 p.m.
#2
Hidalgo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 481
Likes: 223
Quoting: ElPhantasmo
Flames wouldn't trade Bennett for Kerfoot + Andersen, let alone adding Rittich and picks. Leafs fans - it's not happening. Please... stahp!!!!


I get wanting to hold onto Bennett, but that would be stupid to say no to Kerfoot+Andersen, lol.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 10:49 p.m.
#3
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Bennet had a hot steak in the playoffs he's not worth Andersen, who is a huge upgrade over Rittich. Kerfoot vs Bennet isn't that far off. No thanks.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 11:19 p.m.
#4
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 1,805
Quoting: Hidalgo
I get wanting to hold onto Bennett, but that would be stupid to say no to Kerfoot+Andersen, lol.


I love Bennett more than any other Flames player and would hate to trade him for anything but even I have to agree with this.
Hidalgo liked this.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 11:23 p.m.
#5
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 107
Likes: 18
Quoting: Hidalgo
I get wanting to hold onto Bennett, but that would be stupid to say no to Kerfoot+Andersen, lol.


No, it really wouldn't. From a purely financial perspective, this is a disastrous trade for Calgary. Assuming Kerfoot and Bennett are rough equivalents, why would the Flames be willing to take on an additional million in contract for a milder version of Bennett? Not to mention almost double the dollars over and above Rittich for an older goalie with a year left who posted numbers that, although slightly better, simply don't make sense to trade for. That's why this trade will never happen and that's why the Flames would reject both players for Bennett outright.

Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Bennet had a hot steak in the playoffs he's not worth Andersen, who is a huge upgrade over Rittich. Kerfoot vs Bennet isn't that far off. No thanks.


I'm so glad you think so, now please help me convince TML fans to move along in proposing someone other than Bennett.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 11:33 p.m.
#6
Hidalgo
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 481
Likes: 223
Quoting: ElPhantasmo
No, it really wouldn't. From a purely financial perspective, this is a disastrous trade for Calgary. Assuming Kerfoot and Bennett are rough equivalents, why would the Flames be willing to take on an additional million in contract for a milder version of Bennett? Not to mention almost double the dollars over and above Rittich for an older goalie with a year left who posted numbers that, although slightly better, simply don't make sense to trade for. That's why this trade will never happen and that's why the Flames would reject both players for Bennett outright.



I'm so glad you think so, now please help me convince TML fans to move along in proposing someone other than Bennett.


You consider getting a starting goalie on a reasonable salary and having an extra million on a comparably skilled 3C disastrous financially? Come on.. I’m not even saying this cause I want Bennett that just doesn’t make sense to me.
Sep. 16, 2020 at 11:46 p.m.
#7
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 107
Likes: 18
Edited Sep. 16, 2020 at 11:53 p.m.
Quoting: Hidalgo
You consider getting a starting goalie on a reasonable salary and having an extra million on a comparably skilled 3C disastrous financially? Come on.. I’m not even saying this cause I want Bennett that just doesn’t make sense to me.


Yep. Why would you spend an extra $3.25 million for players that offer no significant upgrade? Not to mention having to throw in picks to complete the deal. Unless the GM is Chiarelli, I guess.

*EDIT - Apologies as well - I meant trading Bennett for Kerfoot and Andersen would be financial disaster and wasn't very clear about that. My main problem with the trade as proposed is that there is no advantage to be gained by the Flames in taking on the additional dollars and overpaying for the privilege of doing so.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 6:55 a.m.
#8
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: ElPhantasmo
No, it really wouldn't. From a purely financial perspective, this is a disastrous trade for Calgary. Assuming Kerfoot and Bennett are rough equivalents, why would the Flames be willing to take on an additional million in contract for a milder version of Bennett? Not to mention almost double the dollars over and above Rittich for an older goalie with a year left who posted numbers that, although slightly better, simply don't make sense to trade for. That's why this trade will never happen and that's why the Flames would reject both players for Bennett outright.



I'm so glad you think so, now please help me convince TML fans to move along in proposing someone other than Bennett.


If only I could. Many of my fellow leaf fans get fixated on certain ideas and won't ever drop them. Fans are like people, for the most part they are stupid.
ElPhantasmo liked this.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 6:26 p.m.
#9
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 159
Likes: 8
Quoting: ElPhantasmo
Flames wouldn't trade Bennett for Kerfoot + Andersen, let alone adding Rittich and picks. Leafs fans - it's not happening. Please... stahp!!!!


talk all the trash you want Riddich will never be Andersen. Andersen as the 3rd most wins in the NHL since joining the Leafs in 2016-2017, and the Leafs defense is trash. One team in the west will get him and they will leave your trash team in the dust.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 6:28 p.m.
#10
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 159
Likes: 8
Quoting: Hidalgo
I get wanting to hold onto Bennett, but that would be stupid to say no to Kerfoot+Andersen, lol.


are you referring to the same SAM BENNETT that cannot score 30pts in an NHL season. get real he is completely devoid of offence.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 6:28 p.m.
#11
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 159
Likes: 8
Quoting: PleaseBanMeForMyOwnGood
Bennet had a hot steak in the playoffs he's not worth Andersen, who is a huge upgrade over Rittich. Kerfoot vs Bennet isn't that far off. No thanks.


are you referring to the same SAM BENNETT that cannot score 30pts in an NHL season. get real he is completely devoid of offence.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 6:29 p.m.
#12
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 159
Likes: 8
Quoting: TheFlamingC
I love Bennett more than any other Flames player and would hate to trade him for anything but even I have to agree with this.


are you referring to the same SAM BENNETT that cannot score 30pts in an NHL season. get real he is completely devoid of offence.

SAM BENNET is trash. I'm just trying to make the salaries work.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 6:30 p.m.
#13
Thread Starter
Avatar of the user
Joined: Jun. 2015
Posts: 159
Likes: 8
Quoting: ElPhantasmo
No, it really wouldn't. From a purely financial perspective, this is a disastrous trade for Calgary. Assuming Kerfoot and Bennett are rough equivalents, why would the Flames be willing to take on an additional million in contract for a milder version of Bennett? Not to mention almost double the dollars over and above Rittich for an older goalie with a year left who posted numbers that, although slightly better, simply don't make sense to trade for. That's why this trade will never happen and that's why the Flames would reject both players for Bennett outright.

are you referring to the same SAM BENNETT that cannot score 30pts in an NHL season. get real he is completely devoid of offence.

SAM BENNET is trash. I'm just trying to make the salaries work.


I'm so glad you think so, now please help me convince TML fans to move along in proposing someone other than Bennett.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 7:58 p.m.
#14
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2019
Posts: 3,446
Likes: 1,805
Quoting: LeafsNation2479
are you referring to the same SAM BENNETT that cannot score 30pts in an NHL season. get real he is completely devoid of offence.

SAM BENNET is trash. I'm just trying to make the salaries work.


Are you r*tarded!?!? I was agreeing with your trade dumb*ss. You obviously don't watch hockey if you truly believe this statement and don't understand his value to Calgary.
LeafsNation2479 liked this.
Sep. 17, 2020 at 9:08 p.m.
#15
Banned
Avatar of the user
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 24,997
Likes: 7,855
Quoting: LeafsNation2479
are you referring to the same SAM BENNETT that cannot score 30pts in an NHL season. get real he is completely devoid of offence.


I am not in favour of Bennet
Sep. 17, 2020 at 11:11 p.m.
#16
Avatar of the user
Joined: Apr. 2017
Posts: 107
Likes: 18
Quoting: LeafsNation2479
talk all the trash you want Riddich will never be Andersen. Andersen as the 3rd most wins in the NHL since joining the Leafs in 2016-2017, and the Leafs defense is trash. One team in the west will get him and they will leave your trash team in the dust.


But... you didn't... read the justification..? No trash talking; just economics!

Quoting: ElPhantasmo
Yep. Why would you spend an extra $3.25 million for players that offer no significant upgrade? Not to mention having to throw in picks to complete the deal. Unless the GM is Chiarelli, I guess.

*EDIT - Apologies as well - I meant trading Bennett for Kerfoot and Andersen would be financial disaster and wasn't very clear about that. My main problem with the trade as proposed is that there is no advantage to be gained by the Flames in taking on the additional dollars and overpaying for the privilege of doing so.


See? ^
 
Reply
To create a post please Login or Register
Question:
Options:
Add Option
Submit Poll