Quoting: Birtle34
Devils advocate on a bunch of guys thinking he’s got 3 top end years left, when he’s probably has a year of top end hockey left a mediocre year, and a questionable buyout before year 3, Jets don’t send anything too exciting for him, and if they do what happens when the hawks knock them down to bubble team. All this retain 3 million off is crazy, that’s a solid kid off his entry level deal, that your basically trading for 3 years of retention. Jets can’t afford to miss on him and pay that much for him, your going to have to peddle him to large markets who can buy there way out of any possible mistakes. Like a leafs type scenario of shipping marleaus third year to Carolina for a 1st.
it's nothing like Marleau.
Marleau had to be moved for the leafs to be cap compliant otherwise they suffer a penalty or couldn't ice their roster.
you're comparing apples to Volkswagens.
Toews is 32, Stastny is 34... if Winnipeg went to get Stastny to be a 2C with 1 year left, then they believe certain players can play until 35 years of age (Don't forget 2 years ago they tried to sign him in FA)... which Toews would be at the end of the current contract.
cap retention is only to help make the move go through, as 10.5 is a lot, but Winnipeg or any team trading for him don't care about the 10.5, they care about the cap hit and salary related to the player they are getting.
I disagree with your assessment, Sure, Toews may not be a 30 goal 1C anymore, but he's a 20 goal 70 point 2C who brings experience, locker room leadership on top of his talent and skill, and you're discounting that as though he's some 4th line overpaid scrub.
so what would you give for a 20 goal, 70 point 2C?... if your answer is Stastny... then you're clearly letting your hometown bias affect this.