Quoting: ngikas
Would throwing Lauzon in to the deal be enough to let us keep our 1st?
Maybe? He's definitely a interesting return. But I don't think he's something we would want. Nor do I think you can afford to give him up after losing Krug, and Carlo through the trade above. I think getting a second player back
would drop the requirement down to a 2nd. Buuuuuut, it'd have to be at least someone worth it for us. Someone like Kase, maybe? Which, for the record, I know wouldn't work for Boston.
It's hard, because a trade between the two teams is already pretty unlikely and for the most part isn't a good fit either way. Could something be worked out? Sure. But I'm not convinced it wouldn't take something your not willing to give up. Studnicka is probably bad enough, but we wouldn't have any interest in getting a defenseman back in return. On the backend we're already pretty well set. First, we added some great depth pieces in O'Rourke and Hunt during the draft, so our defensive prospect depth pool on the left looks a lot better now. Second, we extended Brodin and re-signed Soucy, whom I like better than Lauzon anyway if we're being honest. I could see us try and pick up a replacement for Suter in the next couple of years, most likely during next years draft, but we don't need much more than that.
Given that knowledge, our biggest need therefore is forwards. What players from your forwards group would you be willing to part with? Trying to keep the 1st is commendable, if not understandable, given how shallow the Bruins prospect pool is. But, if we're being honest you might just be better off giving up the 1st than losing more just to keep it.
It's food for thought, anyway.