SalarySwishSalarySwish
Forums/Armchair-GM

Unrealistic One for One Trade Challenge

Created by: yikes
Team: 2020-21 San Jose Sharks
Initial Creation Date: Dec. 3, 2020
Published: Dec. 3, 2020
Salary Cap Mode: Basic
Description
I saw this from @BENJAMINWALDER but I’ve decided to make it a twist/ a challenge. His original post was that you can make one unrealistic (a one for one tho)trade no matter how one sided the trade may be. But that’s just to easy and half the trades on this site. So I’ve added these stipulations:

- you are allowed to make 1 completely one sided trade with whomever you want in a one for one scenario (only two players involved in total).
-YOURE only other trade MUST be trading away your teams 2nd highest point getter from the 2019-2020 season (idk I just chose second for zero reason). For the Sharks it’s Kane, for the oilers it’s McDavid LOOOOOOOOOOOOOL.
**Additionally the return must be one of the worst players from the team who’s ALPHABETICALLY 1 letter away from you. So for the Sharks I MUST choose either: PITTSBURGH OR ST LOUIS to get my bad player. Meaning you cant just chose someone decent or someone useful. If the player you must receive comes from Vancouver that would be Eriksson, for Ottawa you’re taking zaitsev, for San Jose you’re taking vlasic, for Boston you’re taking moore, for Tampa you’re taking Johnson; AND SO ON you get the idea. The team must be alphabetically within 1 difference of the team you are. This player CANNOT be buried or bought out and they must be in the lineup.
-FINALLY the player you do trade in your unrealistic trade that is one sided in your favour, this cannot be a player who’s cap hit is above 3 million. MEANING, you’re one sided favourable trade cannot be a cap dumping of a player over 3 million, the player you trade away in your one for one must be under 3 million dollars AAV Cap hit. (So I cannot dump Vlasic for Hedman, it would be Simek for example for hedman, as Vlasic has a AAV Cap of 7m).

Got bored thought this would be a fun twist on the previous post that would make your team becoming better actually harder.
Trades
1.
SJS
  1. Ceci, Cody
Additional Details:
I’m going to assume it’s Cody ceci although matheson’s contract could be what should be the evaluation here, I just went with the worse player with less potential, Ceci.
2.
SJS
    This is my bad trade for my team
    Kane was the sharks second highest scorer
    PIT
      This is my bad trade for my team
      Kane was the sharks second highest scorer
      3.
      SJS
      1. Hart, Carter
      Additional Details:
      This is my unrealistic, favourable trade for the sharks.
      Suomela is under 3mil cap hit
      PHI
      1. Suomela, Antti
      Additional Details:
      This is my unrealistic, favourable trade for the sharks.
      Suomela is under 3mil cap hit
      Buried
      DraftRound 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7
      2021
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      2022
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the MIN
      2023
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      Logo of the SJS
      ROSTER SIZESALARY CAPCAP HITOVERAGES TooltipBONUSESCAP SPACE
      24$81,500,000$66,703,333$0$757,500$14,796,667
      Left WingCentreRight Wing
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $1,900,000$1,900,000
      LW, C, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $5,625,000$5,625,000
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $3,000,000$3,000,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 3
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $1,500,000$1,500,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $8,000,000$8,000,000
      C
      M-NTC
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $4,725,000$4,725,000
      RW, LW
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $700,000$700,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $792,500$792,500 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $778,333$778,333 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
      C
      RFA - 2
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $700,000$700,000
      LW, C
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $750,000$750,000
      C
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $925,000$925,000
      LW, RW
      UFA - 1
      Left DefenseRight DefenseGoaltender
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $2,250,000$2,250,000
      LD/RD
      UFA - 4
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $10,000,000$10,000,000
      RD
      NMC
      UFA - 7
      Logo of the Philadelphia Flyers
      $730,833$730,833 (Performance Bonus$82,500$82K)
      G
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $925,000$925,000 (Performance Bonus$212,500$212K)
      LD
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $5,280,000$5,280,000
      RD
      M-NTC
      UFA - 5
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $2,166,667$2,166,667
      G
      M-NTC
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $7,000,000$7,000,000
      LD/RD
      NMC
      UFA - 6
      Logo of the Pittsburgh Penguins
      $1,250,000$1,250,000
      RD
      UFA - 1
      ScratchesInjured Reserve (IR)Long Term IR (LTIR)
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $836,667$836,667 (Performance Bonus$132,500$132K)
      LW, RW
      UFA - 2
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $700,000$700,000
      C
      UFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $768,333$768,333 (Performance Bonus$65,000$65K)
      LW, RW
      RFA - 1
      Logo of the San Jose Sharks
      $725,000$725,000
      LD
      UFA - 2

      Embed Code

      • To display this team on another website or blog, add this iFrame to the appropriate page
      • Customize the height attribute in the iFrame code below to fit your website appropriately. Minimum recommended: 400px.

      Text-Embed

      Click to Highlight
      Dec. 3, 2020 at 6:21 p.m.
      #1
      CELEBRINI IS A SHARK
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2019
      Posts: 10,144
      Likes: 12,856
      Is this team better, hard to say because losing Kane makes the top 6 already weak on a already slim offensive depth team. But hart provide immense value and actually gives a team that needed goaltending a goalie.
      Dec. 3, 2020 at 6:21 p.m.
      #2
      Thread Starter
      CELEBRINI IS A SHARK
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2019
      Posts: 10,144
      Likes: 12,856
      Dec. 3, 2020 at 7:00 p.m.
      #3
      Banned
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Jun. 2018
      Posts: 19,215
      Likes: 4,837
      For rules please refer to Section F Part 4 column 12, subsection z3 volume 3 paragraph 938 unicorm xyz.
      Revans292 liked this.
      Dec. 3, 2020 at 7:05 p.m.
      #4
      Thread Starter
      CELEBRINI IS A SHARK
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Sep. 2019
      Posts: 10,144
      Likes: 12,856
      Quoting: pharrow
      For rules please refer to Section F Part 4 column 12, subsection z3 volume 3 paragraph 938 unicorm xyz.


      In correct referencing and organization, volume 3 comes before subsection and it’s actually paragraph 948.
      pharrow and Revans292 liked this.
      Dec. 3, 2020 at 7:16 p.m.
      #5
      TOR V5 GM
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Nov. 2020
      Posts: 4,387
      Likes: 1,907
      I like it!
      yikes liked this.
      Dec. 3, 2020 at 10:27 p.m.
      #6
      Avatar of the user
      Joined: Oct. 2020
      Posts: 355
      Likes: 108
      Quoting: pharrow
      For rules please refer to Section F Part 4 column 12, subsection z3 volume 3 paragraph 938 unicorm xyz.


      You forgot clause 3217-439 in reference to article 546.342 subsection 425.874
       
      Reply
      To create a post please Login or Register
      Question:
      Options:
      Add Option
      Submit Poll