DISPLAY SETTING
Toggle Dark Mode
Automatic Theme
BETTING ODDS
Odds Enabled
LOCALE
FR
LOGIN
REGISTER
FORUMS
ARCHIVE ▾
ARCHIVE
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
CBA ▾
CBA
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
LTIR FAQ
Buyout FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ODDS
14
SCOUTING
CALCULATORS ▾
CALCULATORS
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
FANTASY HOCKEY TOOLS
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
Injury History
TOOLS ▾
TOOLS
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Team Affiliates
Professional Tryouts
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
PLAYERS ▾
PLAYERS
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
TEAMS ▾
WESTERN CONFERENCE
PACIFIC
Anaheim Ducks
Calgary Flames
Edmonton Oilers
Los Angeles Kings
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
CENTRAL
Arizona Coyotes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Dallas Stars
Minnesota Wild
Nashville Predators
St. Louis Blues
Winnipeg Jets
EASTERN CONFERENCE
METROPOLITAN
Carolina Hurricanes
Columbus Blue Jackets
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
Washington Capitals
ATLANTIC
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Detroit Red Wings
Florida Panthers
Montreal Canadiens
Ottawa Senators
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
INTERACTIVE ▾
INTERACTIVE FEATURES
Armchair-GM (Custom Roster Simulator)
Mock Draft (Entry Draft Simulator)
Trade Machine (Trade Proposal Simulator)
SEARCH
ARMCHAIR-GM
MOCK-DRAFT
TRADE MACHINE
TEAMS ▾
Anaheim Ducks
Arizona Coyotes
Boston Bruins
Buffalo Sabres
Calgary Flames
Carolina Hurricanes
Chicago Blackhawks
Colorado Avalanche
Columbus Blue Jackets
Dallas Stars
Detroit Red Wings
Edmonton Oilers
Florida Panthers
Los Angeles Kings
Minnesota Wild
Montreal Canadiens
Nashville Predators
New Jersey Devils
New York Islanders
New York Rangers
Ottawa Senators
Philadelphia Flyers
Pittsburgh Penguins
San Jose Sharks
Seattle Kraken
St. Louis Blues
Tampa Bay Lightning
Toronto Maple Leafs
Vancouver Canucks
Vegas Golden Knights
Washington Capitals
Winnipeg Jets
PLAYERS ▾
Free Agents
Active Players
Inactive Players
35+ Contracts
Entry-Level Contracts
Entry-Level Slides
NTC-NMC
Career Earnings
Scouting Reports
Cost Per Point
Cost Per Save
Trades
Signings
Transactions
Injury History
Waivers History
Retained Salary
Buyout History
Contract Comparables
Professional Tryouts
TOOLS ▾
Entry Draft Board
Contract Comparables
Scouting Reports
Arbitration Filings
Professional Tryouts
Coaches
General Managers
COVID Roster Freeze Players
Reserve List Players
(Premium)
Salary Expense Tracker
(Premium)
Trade Clauses Commencing
(Premium)
Team Affiliates
FANTASY-TOOLS ▾
Summary Page
Depth Charts
Starting Goalies
Player Status Updates
CALCULATORS ▾
Buyout Calculator
Waivers Calculator
Qualifying Offer Calculator
Arbitration Calculator
Offer Sheet Calculator
Income Tax Calculator
SCOUTING REPORTS
ODDS
CBA▾
CBA FAQ
Scouting Reports FAQ
Salary Cap History
Maximum Entry-Level Compensation
Buyout FAQ
LTIR FAQ
Offer Sheet FAQ
Waivers FAQ
Reserve List FAQ
Expansion Draft FAQ
ARCHIVE ▾
Past Cap Payrolls
(Premium)
Articles
2017 Vegas Expansion Draft Simulator
2021 Seattle Expansion Draft Simulator
FORUMS
LOGIN
REGISTER
FR
Toggle Dark Mode
Odds Enabled
Revans292
Member Since
Oct. 19, 2020
Favourite Team
San Jose Sharks
2nd Favourite Team
Tampa Bay Lightning
Forum Posts
355
Posts per Day
0.3
POSTS
THREADS
LIKES
ARMCHAIR-GM TEAMS
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Jan. 6, 2021 at 6:13 p.m.
Thread:
This draft sucked
Not for the sharks is didn't! Hertl is one of if not the THE best forward on our team.
and Chris Tierney in the 2nd round was a solid 3C who could be a 2C on some teams.
Forum:
Mock-Draft
Jan. 6, 2021 at 6:11 p.m.
Thread:
A Way to soon 2020 ReDraft with WJC Considerations
I see the shark's still drafting Ozzy at 31. nothing in Kuznetsov game has changed drastically in the last 3 months for me to rate him any higher.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 5, 2021 at 6:23 a.m.
Thread:
Aleksander Gravlev
Lineup makes no sense your 43 mil over the cap.
Sharks should do that trade but Wilson is to prideful to admit he screwed up and sharks and Vegas won’t trade with one another due to the rivalry and close proximity.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 5, 2021 at 6:15 a.m.
Thread:
Change of Scene
Roslovik to me is slightly better than Sorenson and he has publicly stated he wants out, crippling his trade value! your overpaying for him IMO.
Meir PLD and Labanc
That would make a very nice young top line for us with
Kane Hertl TBD
making a great (if healthy) second pairing.
Problem is I think your underpaying for PLD. He’s 22 3 seasons in and looks good! couture is 31 paid top line money till 38 that’s 3 years to many and that destroys his value, but you are right he’s the kinda guy Torts loves!!! But how long is Tort going to actually be there?
My feeling is PLD for Hertl and a 1st or 2nd is the value they want in return, and that’s a wash for us talent wise and fans would hate it.
Couture 2 mil retention plus 2021 1st and 1 of the new kids we just got would be a true starting point and though it’s fair value I feel the sharks Balk, just too much to give up!
wait till Chicago gets healthy and Strome is pushed back down to 3C, offer that first and a good prospect for him! Not quite the same player but he would really add something to our roster without taking away too much value!
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 5, 2021 at 2:58 a.m.
Thread:
Here we go again - Cap problem
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Bolts_Fan_Dan</b></div><div>Boston is definitely want a sweetener to take on MacDonagh’s whole salary so getting a 2 would not happen
All the RFA’s except Volkov take pay cuts?
Nashville bails us out with killorn?
This would be awesome but not seeing it.</div></div>
I see Johnson having a bounce back year and not costing nearly as much to trade, Killorn is a solid player, cousins is a significant step down but in a flat cap the value makes sense.
No way Boston take that deal unless macdonagh balls out next season.
Was hoping the sharks swoop Goodrow at 1.4-1.6 so if you guys like him then I think we’re out.
still the ideas here are solid though I think the next player gone is more likely Stamkos and Johnson, that would set you guys up to revamp and and not go into cap hell again.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Jan. 4, 2021 at 10:12 p.m.
Thread:
Ideally 2022
Leonard I feel will be a full time starter this year if not 100% by 2022.
Melnichuyk or Korenar one of them should be backing up by 2022 if not 2021.
I would love Tierney back he was one of my Favorite
Won’t Marleau be back going for game #2000 lol
And sadly I think at least 1 if not 2 or scarily maybe even all 3 will still be here in 2022
Vlassic for sure as buying him out won’t be logical till 2024 and trading him or him retiring before that just won’t happen.
Jones and Burns both might be trade-able if they play well in 2021 again why retire from Guaranteed money? Make them buy you out.
But I do like your post, sorry for being so contradictory.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 14, 2020 at 12:33 a.m.
Thread:
shrinked options
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>yikes</b></div><div>The sharks can’t expose Karlsson......and it makes no sense to keep burns but not Karlsson lmfao. I’d rather lose burns 9.9/10 to Seattle than Karlsson. Karlsson is still very good and better than burns even while injured Karlsson has outperformed him. Burns still provides offensive production but defensively he fell off a cliff this past season while Karlsson has outperformed him offensively and played very solid defensively especially compared to burns.
The leafs also laugh at that offer. Sorensen is lighting up the 2nd tier Swedish league. It’s cool and impressive but nothing to write home about seeing as it is; a second tier league in an already weaker league system compared to others like the AHL and KHL. Maybe Sorensen could return a second if we’re like lucky and he plays well by TDL</div></div>
Karlsson won’t be traded as no one wants that contract, Bit defensively I watched Karlsson stand next to the net a d watch 15-20 goals scored on him with zero effort from him he is a horrible defensive player. Worse than burns by a lot!!!
<a href="https://youtu.be/BRjEIHnQf8w" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://youtu.be/BRjEIHnQf8w</a>
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 14, 2020 at 12:25 a.m.
Thread:
Capital-ism is Bad
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>Yojimbo</b></div><div>31-28 = 5 years younger?
Literally all that you need to know about the validity of that post, because the rest of it is just as accurate.</div></div>
Ok your right 3 years younger not 5.
Still this trade makes little sense for the sharks
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 12, 2020 at 12:25 a.m.
Thread:
Capital-ism is Bad
You guys are crazy, why would sharks accept that trade?
Sorenson is less than half the cost 5 years younger and similar production potential. This just doesn’t make sense either way.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 11, 2020 at 7:36 p.m.
Thread:
Johnson Option 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sensibleguy</b></div><div>Ottawa still doesn't want Byron, and the definition of a dink is stupid and annoying</div></div>
Why do I want the definition of a dink dude? Just go bug someone else.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 10, 2020 at 4:24 p.m.
Thread:
Johnson Option 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sensibleguy</b></div><div>I don’t care what you remember, it isn’t what happened. If you want to propose a trade, don’t lead with a stupidly coy comment that is baseless to begin with.
Btw, Ottawa doesn’t need your locker room cancer, especially at $7MM per for five more seasons, lol, five seasons</div></div>
Kane isn’t a cancer, he is well liked and popular here. He also is 28 so five more years finish his contract to 33 which is about the life expectancy of your prime years as a power forward Maybe that last year sucks but the other four are still going to produce and produce well. The end of the day this is 100% fantasy never gonna happen the only reason I was Tasing Kane was he is the most tradable asset we have with a large contract.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 10, 2020 at 3:45 p.m.
Thread:
Roussel vs Reaves
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>brocklesnar</b></div><div>Just put Kurtis Gabriel in the lineup.</div></div>
That’s a huge step down lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 10, 2020 at 3:42 p.m.
Thread:
Johnson Option 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sensibleguy</b></div><div>Says then guy who starts off his thread description with idiotic take on a good trade, in an attempt to be funny, and it failed.
Again, look at the player Ryan was in his last two seasons in Anaheim, and that's who they knew they were getting, and got. Ignore the first two seasons in Anaheim because they are what he was, not what he was becoming.
As for Kane, get past the insults and idiotic comparisons, and then maybe we can discuss Kane, but until then, this is about you not understanding the trade you compared your trade to in the beginning.</div></div>
What?
Dude you need to get over yourself.
Your legitimately saying Ottawa was happy with the player they got? I remember from the get go Ottawa feeling Bobby was a bust, you don’t give 7 mil a year to a 45-50 point guys producing 15-20 goals. So give me all the attitude you want I still think your wrong.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 10, 2020 at 2:29 p.m.
Thread:
Roussel vs Reaves
I really have high hopes this year for Sorenson. He’s looking solid right now overseas, like the guy who got 17 goals back in 18/19. Plus he’s half the price. Vancouver would get a steal if they got him.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 10, 2020 at 2:25 p.m.
Thread:
Top 10 Sharks Prospects Ranked
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RawZuccSauce420</b></div><div>I personally would drop down Melnichuk, Kniazev and Pasichnuk at least 1 each just because I’m not really sold on their ceilings. But other than that this is pretty solid! Hard to get a grip on this years prospects until later on but they’re looking good so far.
I would probably bump him up personally I agree he didn’t perform as best as he could last year, but he had an early injury which lingered and cost him. Toward the end of the season he was really, really good.</div></div>
And he got player of the month in the KHL which I would grade a small step up from AHL talent wise. He’s looking like the guy we all got excited for 16 months ago.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 10, 2020 at 2:22 p.m.
Thread:
Johnson option 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DiehardRedWingsFan58</b></div><div>:laugh Tampa's in no position to be eating $2 million on Tyler Johnson for the next 4 years or so, And besides he's being heavily linked to Detroit as we speak. The high California taxes would eat him alive and there's noway he's waiving for the Sharks to lose even more money.</div></div>
Ok California taxes are high... but who the hell wants to live in Detroit? lol
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 10, 2020 at 2:20 p.m.
Thread:
Johnson Option 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>sensibleguy</b></div><div>"Kane is everything Ottawa was looking for when they signed Bobby Ryan except Kane is playing at his peek level and Bobby was on his way down.
I hate giving up Kane especially for so little but I see this as a 3 team trade and we get a nice haul of picks and 2 very solid albeit overpaid players to offset Kane’s loss."
ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
Ottawa wanted a right shot scoring winger to replace Alfredsson, that's what they were looking for. Ryan produced the same in Ottawa as Anaheim, except he didn't have Getzlaf feeding him anymore, and although Spezza is a good playmaker, he's no Getzlaf. So Ryan became more of a playmaker than a finisher, but he was already transitioning to that in Anaheim. The points per game didn't decline, until the hand injuries caught up with him.
Bobby Ryan
Ana 11/12 82 games 31G 26A 57pts 0.70 pts per game
Ana 12/13 46 games 11G 19A 30pts 0.65 pts per game (shortened season 48 games)
Ott 13/14 70 games 23G 25A 48pts 0.69 pts per game
Ott 14/15 78 games 18G 36A 54pts 0.69 pts per game
Ott 15/16 81 games 22G 34A 56pts 0.69 pts per game
<a href="https://www.bardown.com/bobby-ryan-has-the-absolute-worst-luck-with-hand-injuries-1.966864#:~:text=Over%20his%20ten%20year%20career,shot%20from%20defenceman%20Ron%20Hainsey" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://www.bardown.com/bobby-ryan-has-the-absolute-worst-luck-with-hand-injuries-1.966864#:~:text=Over%20his%20ten%20year%20career,shot%20from%20defenceman%20Ron%20Hainsey</a>.
Opposing players began to target Ryans hands.
So starting off with the an incorrect assumption, and an insult to Ryan, is just stupid, when you don't know the facts. Without even talking about the player you want to trade, you've managed to make yourself look like an idiot.</div></div>
Wow rude much dude? You don’t have to be an ass to get your point across.
Ottawa was looking for an aggressive playing power forward and finisher who checked hard and scored goals. Like ryan did in the 11/12 season,
Not the 11-23 goals a year they got.
Kane has been averaging 26-30 goals for the last 4 years checks Hard hits and is disruptive.
Yes they wanted an Alfredson replacement but
Didn’t get it. Kane is a LW not a RW I get that, But my statement is still accurate he is what Ottawa was looking for when the got Ryan save for the wing position.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 10, 2020 at 11:20 a.m.
Thread:
Johnson Option 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>DiehardRedWingsFan58</b></div><div>:laugh Why would either Killorn or Johnson waive for San Jose? The high California taxes will eat them alive. And get real Evander Kane has 3 team trade list and there's no freaking way Ottawa is on it.</div></div>
California taxes suck but players like playing here, a lot of our former players stay after they retire, sharks are one year removed from playing in the western conference finals and these two would help us return plus the rest of all our others players could mean for a big year!
And yea I know Kane likes it here and we like him but he’s one of the easier contracts to move besides this is all make believe anyways
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 10, 2020 at 2:28 a.m.
Thread:
Johnson option 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>jfrojelin</b></div><div>I would totally do this. A 20 goal scorer (in a normal schedule) at 3 mil is totally fair. The last two years would not be great, but hopefully the cap increases by that time, and 3 mil is bearable. Buyout eventually wouldn't be bad.
My only issue looking at Tampa's side, they still need to move a contract to sign Cirelli, I think at least?</div></div>
Johnson is t he hardest contract to move and this gives them enough to resign Cenek and maybe 1 other RFA, they will need to move Killorn or someone else to sign Cirelli
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 10, 2020 at 12:37 a.m.
Thread:
Johnson option 2
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>CheechYou</b></div><div>This option would be far more acceptable for me than the other one posted with Killorn and Johnson both without retention. I wouldn't advocate for this deal, but it's one I could live with without flipping over the table (I realize my love for the Sharks may be a taaaad excessive lol...).
Ideally it'd half retained without getting that 4th for future considerations, but I doubt TBL does that, so I don't see a deal to be made.</div></div>
I’ll pay 3mil a year for a guy 1 year removed from 29 goals,
He’s been a solid 2nd line guy even last years wasn’t horrible, he could play a pavalski roll for us on coutures line or help support the 3 rd line and give us depth.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 10, 2020 at 12:34 a.m.
Thread:
Johnson Option 1
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>pharrow</b></div><div>SJS should swap them bad contracts. Take TJ for 50% of Vlasic.
Seems about fair to me.</div></div>
Tampa needs to dump salary not take it on and Johnson is 1 season removed from 29 goals, I see him as a solid middle 6 guy and I see him tipping 25 goals in like a poor mans Pavalski.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 9, 2020 at 11:41 p.m.
Thread:
Backtoback
Johnson plus the 2022 1st and a b level prospect or you retain half his contract
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 9, 2020 at 11:39 p.m.
Thread:
2021-22
<div class="quote"><div class="quote_t">Quoting: <b>RawZuccSauce420</b></div><div>Too much for Granlund for sure unless he pots like a ppg season this year. Other than that no real complains from me. Vlasic buyout is not friendly though I would do it personally.</div></div>
It’s almost the same cap hit in this year to burry him rather than buy him out and every year we hold on to him is 2 less years he eats our cap plus he is still serviceable D man someone would pick him up if we retain 3-3.5 per season.
Forum:
Armchair-GM
Dec. 9, 2020 at 11:06 p.m.
Thread:
Ah screw it
Giving up our future for the present Chicago is trying to ditch?
Smart dude
Forum:
Fauteuil - DG
Dec. 9, 2020 at 5:35 p.m.
Thread:
Pacioretty
Sharks are very high on Bordeleau and we’re not giving him up for a rental of a middle 6 winger. I like Armia but not that much a 3 rd or 4 th would be our best offer.
1
2
Next
Page 1
SalarySwish
| NBA Salary Caps by CapFriendly
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Forum Rules
About
CBA FAQ
Contact Us
Privacy Manager
Follow @CapFriendly
CapFriendly
CapFriendly
© 2024 CapFriendly.com